The Swiss Government has returned some Bronzes carted away from Benin Kingdom back to Edo state.
Receiving the delegation of Swiss government and top official of Nigeria’s museum, Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, described the return of the Benin Bronzes as a historic milestone for the Benin Kingdom, insisting that the artefacts belong to the Oba of Benin’s Palace and should not be politicised.
Governor Okpebholo stated this on Wednesday when he received the Director-General of the National Commission for Museums and Monuments (NCMM), Olugbile Holloway, alongside the Consul General of Switzerland in Lagos, Conny Camenzind; Director of the Ethnographic Museum of the University of Zurich, Prof Alice Hertzog; Curator at the museum, Dr Alex Malefakis; and other members of the delegation at the Government House in Benin City.
The governor commended the Swiss government and other stakeholders involved in the restitution process, describing the return of the artefacts as a significant moment in the history of the Benin Kingdom.
He said: “First of all, let me thank you for this moment because this is a defining history in our land. To me, there is no point in playing politics with what belongs to the palace.
“We have culture here. I believe in our culture. Those bronzes are not just bronze; they are symbolic and spiritual to our kingdom. Wherever they are, they will all find their way back to Nigeria to Edo State.”
Governor Okpebholo stressed that the Benin Bronzes represent the cultural heritage of the Benin people and should remain under the custody of the traditional institution.
“There is no point playing politics with them. They all belong to the Oba’s Palace. We have only one Oba Palace in Edo State,” he said.
Reflecting on the history behind the removal of the artefacts, the governor explained that the British expedition to Benin was driven by the global recognition of the greatness of the Benin Empire.
“The British that came here came for a reason. They heard something about the Benin Empire. That is why they came here. They found these things very interesting and took them out of this country to theirs.
“So now, I am happy that the Swiss Government has decided to say, ‘Yes, let’s return these back to the owners.’ I want to thank your government for taking this initiative in bringing these bronzes back to our palace.”
He added that the gesture, though significant, would attract greater goodwill and blessings.
“It might look small to you, but the blessings ahead are huge,” the governor said.
Earlier, the NCMM Director-General, Olugbile Holloway, said the visit was to strengthen collaboration with the Edo State Government and mark another step in the international restitution of Benin artefacts.
“As you are aware, with the topic of restitution and the return of the Benin Bronzes, Benin is ground zero when it comes to that aspect, and the National Commission for Museums and Monuments is at the forefront of the battle for restitution.”
He added that the commission was working with the Palace and His Royal Majesty, the Oba of Benin, to ensure that more artefacts taken abroad are returned.
“We are working with the palace and His Royal Majesty to ensure that as many of these bronzes that found their way into foreign museums begin to come home,” he said.
Holloway disclosed that the delegation would proceed to the Oba’s Palace to symbolically present some of the returned artefacts to the Oba of Benin for ceremonial blessings.
He said all the artefacts returned by Switzerland had arrived in Nigeria and were currently in Lagos
Speaking on behalf of the Swiss Government, Consul General, Conny Camenzind described the restitution as a major milestone in the relationship between Switzerland and Nigeria.
She expressed pride in Switzerland’s role in the process, noting that the collaboration with the NCMM and the museums involved had been successful.
Camenzind said the restitution represented the beginning of a long-term partnership, adding that she expected the relationship between both countries to continue to grow.
For the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), processes for submission of candidates for national Assembly contest, next year is foreclosed, despite reactions from candidates whose names were dropped from the list.
The party confirmed that the comprehensive list containing names of contestants for national Assembly election has been submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
However, protest from those dropped from the list and their supporters continued in state like Ondo.
In the submitted list, the APC National Working Committee (NWC) dropped former Benue Governor, Gabriel Suswam and five other senatorial candidates from the party’s final lists of candidates forwarded to the INEC.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that former Ondo State House of Representatives member, Gbenga Elegbeleye was also dropped from the list among others.
Also contained in the final lists of dropped and replaced candidates forwarded to INEC, are 19 House of Representatives candidates that emerged victorious in the party’s primary elections held in May 2026.
According to the document forwarded to INEC, the states affected were Abia, Kogi, Taraba, Benue,Ebonyi, Ondo, Kaduna, Niger and Kwara.
In the letter sent to INEC and signed by APC National Chairman, Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda, and its National Secretary, Ajibola Basiru, the party attributed the changes to the report of its Primary Election Appeal Committee.
The letter was titled: “Forwarding of approved list of senatorial and House of Representatives candidates :
The letter reads:“We write to formally forward the attached list of the party’s candidates for the affected senatorial and House of Representatives constituencies arising from the report of the Primary Election Appeal Committee.
“Following the determination of appeals from the recently concluded primary elections, the reports of the Appeal Committee were reviewed and subsequently considered and approved by the party’s NWC as its final position on the affected constituencies.
“In accordance with the amended Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations and guidelines, we hereby transmit the enclosed list of the approved candidates for seven senatorial districts and 19 House of Representatives constituencies for your records and necessary action.
“Please accept the assurances of our highest regards.”
Sen. Godswill Akpabio, President of the Senate, his deputy, Sen. Jibrin Barau, Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele, Senate Chief Whip Mohammed Monguno and Sen. Adams Oshiomhole received their Candidate Affidavit Forms (EC9).
Four state governors are among the candidates whose names were uploaded by the APC to the INEC portal.
The four governors are AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq of Kwara, Hope Uzodimma of Imo, Ahmadu Fintiri of Adamawa and Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe who had all been cleared by the party to contest Senate seats.
Also cleared are former Kaduna State Governor Mukhtar Yero, Sen. Shehu Sani and Sen. Sunday Katung to contest Senate seats in Kaduna State.
Former Kogi Governor, Yahaya Bello secured the party’s ticket for the Kogi Central Senatorial District, he is among the 109 senatorial candidates running on the APC platform.
The uploading of candidates’ particulars, a continuous process, followed the ratification of the results of the April shadow polls and a review of the list in line with the outcome of the Primary Appeal Reports and INEC’S guidelines.
Report added that for the House of Representatives, Speaker Abbas Tajudeen, Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, Mudashiru Obasa and James Faleke are among candidates to fly APC’s flag.
According to Mr Felix Morka, the APC National Publicity Secretary, the party received over 700 petitions from aggrieved members on the ongoing process.
He, however said that the party’s priority now, was for all its candidates to complete their INEC nomination forms and have them uploaded to the commission’s portal.
He said those who emerged as the party’s candidates, were being provided with the relevant forms for documentation.
“They are to complete and return the forms to the party for upload to the INEC portal, so, making the list public is not our priority now.
“Although we will eventually release the list, our immediate priority is to ensure that our candidates complete their forms and meet INEC’S deadline.
“This is more important to us than the public release of the candidates’ list. Those who are our candidates have, by now, received their forms.They already know themselves, there is no tension about that,” Morka said.
Political parties are expected to upload names and particulars of their presidential and National Assembly candidates on INEC’S nomination portal between 9 a.m from June 27, to 6p.m July 10, when the portal would be closed.
The documents to be uploaded include Form EC9, containing candidates’ personal particulars, and Forms EC9A, EC9B, EC9C, EC9D and EC9E, containing the names and lists of nominated candidates.
In the meantime, INEC had earlier conducted a two-day training for political party officials on the use of its Candidate Nomination Portal (ICNP) ahead of the exercise, after which parties were issued access codes.
The training was conducted by officials of the commission’s ICT Department in line with its established practice of ensuring that stakeholders were properly prepared for electoral processes.
Prof. Ibrahim Sani, the acting Director-General of the Electoral Institute, had earlier said that candidate nomination was a fundamental stage of the electoral process.
He said the success of any election began with the proper nomination of candidates, adding that political parties must fully understand and comply with the legal and procedural requirements guiding the process.
In response to the Minister of Petroleum, Oil, Heineken Lokpobiri on marketers to reduce the pump price of Petro, fuel traders under the aegis of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, IPMAN has rebuffed him.
Reacting to the remark made by the minister, IPMAN National Secretary, Chinedu Ukadike, said the Minister cannot tell marketers what price to sell their products, under a deregulated market system.
“Marketers will shut down if they try somehow to enforce price control,” Ukadike threatened.
According to him, the marketers will sell based on what they buy, adding that the federal government should look elsewhere on who to blame for the high cost of Petroleum products in the country.
The Minister had on Sunday, during a stakeholders meeting in Abuja, the nation’s capital rebuked the marketers for not reducing the pump price of petrol despite the falling crude oil prices in the international marketers.
Not a few Nigerians have also criticized the marketers for not reflecting the reduced cost of crude oil at the pump, saying the marketers were quick to raise the price when crude oil price went up in February due to the War between US/ Isreal and Iran, but failed to reduce the price now that crude oil price has fallen to as low as $75 per barrel, from over $120 per barrel at the peak of the hostilities.
He directed agency of government responsible for consumer protection, to swing into action to ensure that Nigerians are not ripped up by the marketers.
But in a swift reaction, the marketers said they will sell what they buy, saying they have been incurring loses due to the instability caused by the war in the Middle East.
IPMAN scribe said the government should focus on how to revamp the nation’s dilapidated refineries, saying that will bring about competition and force down the price of petrol in the country.
“Marketers will shut down if they try somehow to enforce price control. We are going to shut down our stations nationwide. You can’t be regulating a deregulated market. You can’t tell me how much to sell my product without trying to know how much I bought it,” he said.
“We, the independent marketers, are losing money. We bought petrol at a particular rate a few days ago; on our way to our filling stations, there was a reduction. We have been struggling with the price. We have been struggling against financial losses. We are also struggling against stagnation due to low patronage of our products. Because those marketers who are purchasing now are purchasing at a lower price, and they are selling cheaper.”
He explained that petrol price is determined by market forces, noting that the marketers have also incurred loses due to recent fluctuations in the sector, as a result of the war, adding that many marketers are trading with loans from banks.
“If you don’t bring down your price, you cannot see buyers. This is the beauty of deregulation. If you cannot compete, you will not survive in the market. And because most of us are trading on bank loans, the bank does not know when the price goes up or goes down. Their interest rate is fixed; their return on investment is fixed. So, you must pay them. This is the situation we find ourselves in,” he said.
Adding, “By the time more products come in, you will see that the prices will go down. What we, independent marketers, are asking for is not about regulation or trying to bring price control or trying to force marketers to sell below or trying to force Dangote to sell below its production cost. What we are asking is to open up the various channels, boost importation, and let local refineries start refining. This will push the competition to the peak. With this, prices will drastically go down.
“The primary cause of this is that there is no competition. If there should be competition, the refineries will be working. That is where the minister should put his energy to ensure that our local refineries or whatever partnership we have with the Chinese will work. It is not about going to filling stations to check who is selling at higher prices. Do you know how much I bought the fuel for? Can you have a regulated market in a deregulated economy? You can’t be blowing hot and cold at the same time. The PIA must be followed to the letter. If they try to enforce price control, we will shut down”.
Similarly, President Donald Trump of the United States had threatened that his administration will come down hard on fuel markerketers in the country.
The US Leader warned that his government will take action against them if they failed to reduce the price now that crude oil prices have fallen.
Despite mounting criticisms and fears over the astronomical rise in its debt profile, the apex global financial institution, the World Bank on Wednesday, July 1, 2026 announced the approval of a new loan package of $1.25 billion for Nigeria.
The approval coincided with the launch of the bank’s new Country Partnership Framework CPF , which is expected to drive its development support to Nigeria beginning from 2026 to 2032.
The Source reports that President Bola Tinubu’s administration has, of late, come under intense scrutiny, and criticisms over its seemingly unbridled appetite for loans, a development which not a few contend may have long-term negative consequences on the country.
Recent figures from the Debt Management Office DMO estimates Nigeria’s indebtedness to the global financial institution to be hovering around $ 19.89 billion as at the end of the 2025 fiscal year.
Cumulatively, the total debt profile of the country within the same period stood at about $ 51.86 billion.
Many have questioned the high level borrowing culture, even with the removal of the petroleum subsidy regime, a policy which has unarguably shore up internally generated revenue among all the tiers of Government.
According to a statement released on Wednesday, the World said the new loan package will drive economic reforms targeted at modernising Nigeria’s digital economic sector , improving electricity sector governance , reducing trade barriers in line with regional agreements, as well as strengthening the country’s domestic capital markets.
The World Bank emphasized that the new partnership framework will consolidate on macroeconomic reforms already implemented by the Nigerian Government, which it believes have strengthened economic stability ,increased foreign reserves, and improved investor confidence.
The Bank expressed the confidence that through the new partnership framework, over 32 million Nigerians will gain access to electricity, with about 58 million people having broadband connectivity.
According to the bank, the partnership will guarantee access to improved healthcare services for approximately 40 million people, as well as support no fewer than 9.5 million farmers in boosting agricultural productivity, and food security.
Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Navy, Hon. Yusuf Gagdi, has questioned the opposition’s criticism of the proposed creation of state police, saying their concern over its timing rather than its potential to address insecurity was difficult to understand.
Speaking Tuesday on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Gagdi specifically faulted former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and former Labour Party presidential candidate Peter Obi for allegedly linking the initiative to the 2027 elections.
He argued that with insecurity worsening across the country, political leaders should prioritise measures capable of protecting lives instead of questioning when such reforms were introduced.
“Who is talking about the creation of state policing? Who in his right sense will only analyse the creation of State Police to 2027 election only?” he asked.
“If those people that you called their names are patriotic Nigerians, is it time that is their problem, or the killings?”
Gagdi said the current constitutional framework before the National Assembly was significantly different from earlier proposals he had opposed.
“I saw the policy framework of the state policing that was intended to be created then as an anarchy. But I am privileged to work on the present legal framework that seeks to establish the new State policing under the new Section 214 of the Constitution.”
According to him, the proposed arrangement introduces safeguards against political abuse by governors.
“If prior to this time you wanted me to support state policing where governors would simply sit in their offices and appoint commissioners of police, I would not support it.
“But today, the legal framework says governors will nominate candidates to the Federal Police Council, which will determine who is fit.”
He added that governors would no longer possess arbitrary powers to remove state police commissioners.
“The clauses protect the proposed commissioners of police. No governor will sit within the comfort of his office and fire the commissioner of police.”
“It means you have protected the person you are appointing.”
Gagdi said the transparent appointment process would reduce politicisation while strengthening accountability.
“You have equally made the appointment so transparent that it will not be politicised.”
He explained that the establishment of state police would complement rather than replace the Nigeria Police Force.
“We didn’t scrap the federal police. It still exists. The establishment of state policing doesn’t mean the federal police is going to be scrapped.”
According to him, state police would significantly expand Nigeria’s security architecture.
“Now you have regional police. It increases the number of security agencies. It also instigates commitment from the regional governments to make serious investment in the security architecture of this country.”
He described criticism of the initiative’s timing as misplaced.
“With the level of escalation of insecurity in Nigeria, everybody admits there is a problem.
“Now, with the effort to create State Police with a proper legal framework, why are the opposition complaining?
“Why is Atiku and Peter Obi concerned about the timing of creating a security outfit that will help in protecting the lives and property of Nigerians?”
A former Minister of Science and Technology, Uche Nnaji, has been, finally, arrested after several months of uncertainty that trailed his alleged Certificate Forgery Scandal.
He was arrested Wednesday morning at the Akanu Ibiam International Airport in Enugu while preparing to board a chartered flight to Abuja.
Nnaji was intercepted by security operatives at the airport and taken into custody.
He is expected to be handed over to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, ICPC, for further questioning.
Recall that Nnaji’s alleged Certificate forgery scandal has been a long-running controversy. He was alleged to have submitted forged academic credentials during his appointment process.
He has been under investigation following allegations that he falsified his educational records, including his University degree and National Youth Service Corps, NYSC, certificate.
This led to his forced resignation as Minister, as the matter gained wider public attention after investigations raised questions over the authenticity of documents submitted by the former minister to key government institutions during his screening and confirmation process.
Civil Society Groups, anti corruption Groups and opposition Parties had petitioned President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over the certificate forgery Scandal rocking his administration, with
findings from earlier investigations disclosing that documents were reportedly submitted to the Nigerian Senate, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, and other security agencies as part of official verification procedures.
The anti-corruption agency had intensified efforts to bring Nnaji in for questioning after accusing him of repeatedly ignoring several invitations sent to him regarding the case.
His alleged refusal to honour those invitations reportedly pushed the commission to seek legal backing for stronger action.
Earlier in June 2026, a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja granted the ICPC permission to arrest the former minister as part of ongoing investigations into the alleged certificate forgery.
The Court also approved an application allowing the commission to declare him wanted through newspapers, social media platforms, and other media channels if necessary.
The Commission argued before the court that Nnaji had failed to cooperate with investigators despite repeated invitations for what it described as investigative activities.
The forgery allegations stem from reports suggesting that the former minister presented documents claiming he graduated from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka (UNN) and completed the mandatory NYSC programme.
However, investigations later cast doubt on the authenticity of both certificates.
The scandal deepened following news that Nnaji had reportedly admitted that UNN did not issue him a degree certificate, a revelation that further strengthened public scrutiny around the case.
Despite the allegations, the former minister had maintained his innocence and previously dismissed reports surrounding the matter as a coordinated media attack.
He also challenged the court’s arrest order by filing an appeal at the Court of Appeal in Abuja in an attempt to halt enforcement.
His arrest now signals a significant turning point in the case as investigators move to intensify questioning.
Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna state has stared that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has done enough for the north to attract it’s votes in 2027.
The Kaduna helmsman said the president has done more for the region than all his predecessor, including the immediate past president, late Muhammadu Buhari, a northerner who died last year.
Governor Sani made the remark while speaking during an interview on ARISE Television on Tuesday, saying President Tinubu will even garner more votes from the north, more than what he got in the 2023 presidential election.
Most of the votes secured by the president to emerged victor in that election were mostly from the region.
Recently, however, there’s a serious debate in the region on whether the incumbent, who’s seeking a return to office should be supported.
Some of the president’s critics in the region have vehemently opposed his return to office next, accusing him of abandoning the region despite receiving massive support from it three years ago.
Sani, a staunch ally of the president however insisted that President Tinubu has done well for the region, saying it’s people will back his reelection.
He dismissed suggestions that northerners are disappointed with President Tinubu, saying he meant well for the region, citing some signature infrastructure of the incumbent in the region, including roads, which he said were abandoned by his predecessors.
“Let me be very frank with you. And when I talk, I talk on the basis of data and statistics. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu today, I can tell you, he has done more than any leader for Northern Nigeria,” the governor said.
According to Sani, “I can tell you categorically, no president has done to the North in terms of development as President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has done in the last three years. And I’m speaking on the basis of data and statistics.
“A lot of people have come here and told you the North will not vote for Asiwaju. That is a figment of their imagination.”
“I can tell you categorically, I’m the Governor of Kaduna State and I can tell you, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu will get more votes in 2027 than what he got.”
Continuing, Sani said, “As we are speaking, and you should jot it down, this project will be commissioned, by God’s grace, November this year, because over N600 billion has already been paid to the contractor.
“I’m following the project personally… President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has already paid the contractors over N600 billion from about N750 billion of the project to complete the road by November.
“Only last three weeks, the President has paid part of the N178 billion to construct the road from Kaduna to Birnin Gwari, which was abandoned for over 25 years. And you tell me the people will not be happy?” the governor said.
“Full Speech Delivered By Chief Olabode George At The 80th Rememberance Anniversary Of Herbert Macaulay In Lagos.”
*Protocols*
I consider it a great honour and privilege to have been invited to deliver this epoch memorial lecture in honour of one of the most remarkable figures in the history of our nation, Herbert Samuel Heelas Macaulay.
Whenever the name Herbert Macaulay is mentioned, one description immediately comes to mind: “The Father of Nigerian Nationalism.”
That title was not inherited.
It was earned.
It was earned through courage in the face of intimidation, through conviction in the face of opposition, through sacrifice in the service of a cause greater than self and finally through an unwavering belief that Nigerians deserved dignity, representation, justice, and a meaningful voice in determining their own future.
Your Excellency, Mr. President, I acknowledge your presence with respect and appreciation. Your attendance at a lecture honouring Herbert Macaulay reflects the importance of preserving the memory of those whose sacrifices helped to lay the foundations of our nation.
The issues we discuss today are therefore not merely historical, they concern the continuing journey of Nigeria and the responsibility that rests upon every generation entrusted with her leadership.
Today, we gather not merely to remember a historical figure, we gather to reflect upon the life, character, vision and enduring relevance of a man whose influence continues to shape the Nigerian story.To understand Papa Herbert Macaulay is, in many respects, to understand an important chapter in the making of modern Nigeria. His life reminds us that nations are not built by accident. They are built by men and women who possess the courage to challenge injustice, the vision to imagine a better future, and the determination to pursue that future regardless of personal cost.
Papa Herbert Samuel Heelas Macaulay was born on the 14th of November, 1864, in Lagos. He was born into a family distinguished by scholarship, leadership, faith, and public service.
Chief Bode George
He was the grandson of Bishop Samuel Ajayi Crowther, the first African Anglican Bishop and one of the most extraordinary Africans of the nineteenth century. The influence of Bishop Crowther upon the young Herbert Macaulay cannot be overstated.
The story of Bishop Crowther is itself one of the most inspiring stories in African history.
Captured into slavery as a child, liberated by the British Navy, educated in Sierra Leone, and eventually elevated to the episcopate, he became a symbol of African excellence, resilience, faith, and intellectual achievement.From him, Herbert Macaulay inherited more than a distinguished family name. He inherited a commitment to learning, he inherited discipline, he inherited faith, he inherited a sense of duty.
And perhaps most importantly, he inherited the conviction that privilege carries responsibility.
The values that shaped Herbert Macaulay were therefore not accidental. They were deeply rooted in a family tradition that emphasised education, service, leadership, and responsibility to society.
From an early age, he demonstrated exceptional intelligence and intellectual curiosity. He received his education at CMS Grammar School, Lagos, one of the foremost educational institutions of its time.
At a period when educational opportunities for Africans were severely limited, Herbert Macaulay distinguished himself academically. His talents eventually earned him the opportunity to pursue further studies in England.There he studied engineering, surveying, and related technical disciplines, acquiring professional qualifications that placed him among the most accomplished Africans of his generation. At a time when very few Africans possessed such credentials, Herbert Macaulay stood out as a highly educated professional whose expertise commanded respect.
His education equipped him not only with technical competence but also with a broader understanding of governance, administration, and the structures through which societies function. Upon his return to Lagos, he joined the colonial civil service as a surveyor in the Public Works Department.
His competence quickly became evident.Yet it was during this period that he also encountered firsthand the inequalities embedded within the colonial system. Working within government exposed him to realities that would profoundly shape the course of his life. He observed a society in which decisions affecting Nigerians were frequently made without meaningful Nigerian participation.
He witnessed policies that disadvantaged indigenous communities. He saw traditional rights weakened.He saw land disputes resolved in ways that often favoured colonial interests over local interests.And he came to understand a truth that remains relevant in every age: – that is, Governance without representation inevitably produces injustice. For many people, such observations might have remained private frustrations.
For Herbert Macaulay, they became a call to action.He recognised that education carries responsibility.He understood that privilege imposes duty.He believed that knowledge must be used in the service of justice.
What began as concern gradually evolved into activism.What began as activism eventually matured into leadership.The colonial authorities soon discovered that Herbert Macaulay was not a man who could easily be intimidated.
He questioned decisions he believed were unjust.He challenged policies that disadvantaged Nigerians.He confronted authority when he believed authority was wrong.He spoke boldly when silence would have been safer.And he did so at considerable personal cost.
His growing criticism of colonial policies brought him into repeated conflict with those who exercised power.
He faced harassment.
He faced prosecution.
He faced imprisonment.
He faced sustained efforts to diminish his influence and silence his voice. Yet throughout these struggles he remained remarkably consistent. His commitment was never rooted in personal gain. It was rooted in his conviction that Nigerians deserved dignity, representation, and a meaningful voice in determining their own future.
The more he witnessed injustice, the more convinced he became that meaningful change required organisation, leadership, and collective action.That conviction would ultimately lead him from activism into politics and establish his place in history as the Father of Nigerian Nationalism.
And it is at this point that Herbert Macaulay ceases to be merely an educated professional and emerges as something far greater:
The recognised voice of an awakening people.
The champion of political representation.
*The defender of indigenous rights*
And d. the pioneer of organised democratic politics in Nigeria.
In Part II this lecture stops being a biography and becomes a national story. This section shows how Herbert Macaulay moved from activism to nation-building and why his legacy still matters today.
PART II
THE NATIONALIST, THE POLITICAL PIONEER, AND THE UNFINISHED WORK OF NATION-BUILDINGAs Herbert Macaulay’s influence expanded beyond Lagos, so too did his understanding of the challenges confronting the Nigerian people.He came to realise that meaningful change could not be achieved through criticism alone.Passion was not enough.Public advocacy was not enough.There had to be an organised platform through which the aspirations, concerns, and interests of Nigerians could be articulated, defended, and advanced.
This understanding marked a turning point in his public life.What distinguished Herbert Macaulay from many of his contemporaries was his refusal to accept injustice as inevitable.
He possessed the rare combination of education, courage, vision, and conviction.He was prepared to challenge authority when he believed authority was wrong.He was prepared to speak when silence would have been safer.
And he was prepared to endure personal consequences in defence of principles he believed were essential to justice and national progress. His experiences under colonial administration strengthened rather than weakened his resolve.The more he witnessed exclusion from governance, the more convinced he became that Nigerians deserved a greater role in determining their own future. By the early decades of the twentieth century, Herbert Macaulay had emerged as one of the most influential public figures in Lagos.
Through journalism, public advocacy, civic engagement, and political mobilisation, he became a powerful voice for reform and representation.His influence did not derive from wealth.It did not derive from official position.It derived from the confidence ordinary people placed in his willingness to speak on their behalf.
He became, in many respects, the voice of those whose concerns were often ignored.What began as advocacy on behalf of Lagosians gradually evolved into something much larger.Herbert Macaulay came to understand that the struggle before him extended beyond Lagos.It extended beyond any single ethnic group.It extended beyond any individual ambition.His nationalism was inclusive.
He envisioned a Nigeria in which every citizen would have a stake in the nation’s future.He believed that governance should be accountable to the people.He believed that public institutions should exist to serve the public interest.He believed that nation-building required both rights and responsibilities.Most importantly, he believed that Nigerians possessed the capacity to govern their own affairs.
At a time when many doubted the political capabilities of Africans, Herbert Macaulay demonstrated unwavering confidence in the ability of Nigerians to shape their own destiny.This conviction led to one of the most significant milestones in Nigerian political history.
In 1923, Herbert Macaulay founded the Nigerian National Democratic Party, the NNDP—the first political party in Nigeria.The establishment of the NNDP represented a watershed moment in the political development of our country.For the first time, Nigerians had an organised political platform dedicated to advancing their interests and promoting political participation.
The formation of the NNDP marked the transition from isolated resistance to structured political engagement.It transformed political advocacy into organised political action.The NNDP was more than a political party.It was a declaration of confidence in the political future of Nigerians.It was an affirmation that Nigerians deserved representation.It was an assertion that Nigerians should participate meaningfully in decisions affecting their lives.It was, in many respects, the beginning of organised democratic politics in Nigeria.
Through the NNDP, Herbert Macaulay demonstrated that effective leadership requires more than criticism.It requires organisation.It requires institution-building.It requires the ability to convert ideas into action and aspirations into achievement.This remains one of the enduring lessons of his life.
Great nations are not built merely by identifying problems.They are built by creating institutions capable of solving them.
As the years progressed, Herbert Macaulay’s reputation continued to grow.He became increasingly recognised not merely as a political activist but as the foremost symbol of emerging Nigerian nationalism.
His leadership inspired a generation of Nigerians to believe that change was possible.
He encouraged citizens to see themselves not simply as subjects of colonial administration but as stakeholders in the future of their country.Long before independence became a realistic political objective, Herbert Macaulay was laying the intellectual and political foundations upon which future generations would build.
He planted seeds whose harvest he knew he might never personally enjoy.Yet he continued the work because he understood that true leadership is measured not by immediate reward but by lasting impact.One of the most significant chapters of Herbert Macaulay’s later years was his collaboration with Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe. Together, they helped transform nationalist aspirations into a truly national movement.
The partnership between Herbert Macaulay and Nnamdi Azikiwe represented a powerful convergence of experience and youthful energy.Macaulay brought wisdom, credibility, and decades of political struggle. Azikiwe brought dynamism, intellectual influence, and a growing national following.
Together, they demonstrated the power of unity of purpose in pursuit of a greater cause.Their collaboration helped strengthen nationalist politics and prepared the ground for the developments that would eventually lead to self-government and independence.
Although Herbert Macaulay did not live to witness the attainment of independence in 1960, his contribution to that achievement remains immeasurable.He passed away in 1946, fourteen years before the realisation of the dream for which he had laboured.
Yet history remembers him because he belonged to that rare category of leaders who devote themselves to causes greater than themselves.He invested in a future that he knew he might never see.He planted seeds whose harvest would belong to future generations.
That, perhaps, is one of the greatest lessons of his life.The generation of Herbert Macaulay understood sacrifice.They understood duty.They understood stewardship.And they understood that nation-building is a responsibility that extends beyond one’s own lifetime.
Ladies and gentlemen,As we reflect upon Herbert Macaulay’s life and legacy, we must now ask ourselves a profoundly important question:
What would the Father of Nigerian Nationalism make of the Nigeria we have become?
Would he recognise the democratic ideals for which he struggled?
Would he be satisfied with the strength of our institutions?
Would he be content with the quality of our leadership?
Would he believe that public office is always exercised in the service of the people?
Would he conclude that the sacrifices of his generation have been fully honoured?
Or would he conclude that some of the battles fought by his generation are still being fought today under different names and in different forms?These are not comfortable questions.But history rarely asks comfortable questions.History asks honest questions.And honest questions demand honest answers.
For while Nigeria has made undeniable progress since independence, there remain challenges that continue to test our national resolve.Indeed, there are moments when one imagines that Herbert Macaulay would view some of our present realities with profound concern.
The Father of Nigerian Nationalism fought for representation, accountability, justice, and the supremacy of the public interest over personal ambition.He fought against exclusion.He fought against arbitrary power.He fought against systems that denied ordinary people a meaningful voice in determining their future.
Were he to observe some of the challenges confronting Nigeria today—the persistence of insecurity, the erosion of public trust, concerns about the strength and independence of institutions, and the frustrations of many citizens—he would undoubtedly remind us that nation-building requires more than political rhetoric.
It requires courage.It requires integrity.It requires institutions strong enough to withstand pressure.And it requires leaders willing to place country above self.Not because Nigeria has failed.But because Nigeria has not yet fully become all that it has the capacity to be.And that unfinished task now belongs to us.
PART III
DEMOCRACY, INSTITUTIONS, NATIONAL SECURITY, AND THE UNFINISHED TASK OF NATION-BUILDING
Ladies and gentlemen,
The unfinished task before our generation is not the struggle against colonial rule. That battle was fought by Herbert Macaulay and those who followed him.The unfinished task before us is the struggle to build a nation worthy of their sacrifices.The challenge before us is to strengthen democratic institutions.To deepen public accountability.To promote justice and fairness.To ensure that leadership remains a sacred trust rather than a personal privilege.To build a society in which every citizen believes that they have a stake in the success of the nation.
For Herbert Macaulay understood something that every generation must remember: The strength of a democracy is not measured by the power of those who govern.It is measured by the strength of the institutions that restrain power.
Across our nation today, many citizens are asking difficult questions.
Questions about accountability.
Questions about transparency.
Questions about the administration of justice.
Questions about whether constitutional principles are always protected with the vigilance they deserve.
Questions about whether institutions established to serve the people remain sufficiently insulated from partisan pressures.
These concerns cannot simply be ignored.For democracy survives on confidence.Confidence in the rule of law.Confidence in the impartiality of institutions.Confidence that justice will neither be delayed nor denied.Confidence that public authority will always remain subject to constitutional restraint.Once citizens begin to lose confidence in institutions, the foundations of democratic governance begin to weaken.
History offers a warning that no serious democracy should ignore the following:
When political competition weakens, democracy weakens.
When institutions cease to be visibly impartial, democracy weakens.
When opposition voices are treated as enemies rather than participants in the democratic process, democracy weakens.
And when citizens begin to believe that political outcomes are predetermined, public confidence suffers.
No patriot should desire a Nigeria in which democratic choice becomes an illusion.No patriot should desire a Nigeria in which institutions are viewed through partisan lenses.No patriot should desire a Nigeria where the concentration of power becomes a substitute for democratic legitimacy.
The lesson of history is clear.Governments come and go.Political parties rise and fall.Presidents come and go.But institutions must endure.For when institutions are weakened, nations suffer.When justice is perceived to be selective, public confidence suffers.When power ceases to recognise restraint, democracy itself comes under pressure.These are not partisan concerns.They are national concerns.And they are concerns that every patriot should take seriously.Your Excellency, Mr. President,History occasionally grants leaders the opportunity not merely to govern but to shape the future direction of a nation.Such moments are rare.They demand courage.They demand vision.And they demand a commitment to strengthening institutions beyond one’s own tenure.
The generation of Herbert Macaulay struggled to secure representation.Subsequent generations struggled to secure independence.Our generation must secure the integrity of democracy, the strength of our institutions, and the confidence of our citizens in the fairness of the Nigerian state.
History will ultimately judge all of us not by the offices we held, but by the institutions we strengthened, the justice we protected, and the legacy we leave behind.
Ladies and gentlemen,As we reflect upon Herbert Macaulay’s vision for Nigeria, we must also reflect honestly upon one of the greatest challenges confronting our nation today: insecurity.
Across various parts of our country, communities have experienced violence, displacement, fear, and uncertainty.Families have mourned loved ones.Businesses have suffered disruption.Farmers have been unable to access their lands.Children have been deprived of the peace and stability necessary for learning and development.
Behind every statistic is a human story.Behind every casualty is a family.Behind every attack is a community whose peace has been disrupted.No nation can achieve its full potential while citizens live in fear.No economy can flourish where communities remain insecure.No democracy can deepen where insecurity undermines public confidence.Security is not merely a military objective.
It is the foundation upon which national development, economic growth, social stability, and democratic progress must rest.
As we discuss patriotism and nation-building, we must never forget those who stand between order and chaos.The men and women of our Armed Forces.The Nigeria Police Force.The intelligence services.The Civil Defence Corps.And all who daily place themselves in harm’s way in service to our nation.Many serve under difficult and dangerous conditions.Many spend long periods away from their families.And some have made the ultimate sacrifice.
A grateful nation must never take such sacrifices for granted.We honour their courage.We honour their service.And we pray that God will continue to protect all who serve this nation with honour.As I conclude this memorial lecture, I return once more to the life of Herbert Samuel Heelas Macaulay.He did not live to see the Nigeria for which he struggled.He did not live to witness independence.He did not live to enjoy the harvest of the seeds he planted.Yet he planted them anyway.That is patriotism.That is sacrifice.That is statesmanship.
The generation of Herbert Macaulay did its duty.The question before us is whether we shall do ours.For every generation is tested.Some generations are tested by war.Some by oppression.
Some by economic hardship.Our generation is being tested by whether we shall defend the institutions of democracy, preserve the rule of law, uphold justice, and place country above self.History teaches us that nations rarely lose their way suddenly.They lose their way when corruption becomes normal.When injustice becomes acceptable.When power becomes more important than principle.When citizens become indifferent to the gradual erosion of the values upon which great nations are built.The real danger facing a nation is not merely corruption.It is the normalisation of corruption.The real danger is not merely injustice.It is the acceptance of injustice.The real danger is not merely the abuse of power.It is the silence of good people in the face of abuse.
My fellow Nigerians,The future of our country will not be determined by those who came before us.Their work is done.The future of Nigeria will be determined by what we choose to defend, what we choose to tolerate, and what we choose to build.
When future generations look back upon our own time, may they say that we strengthened our institutions.May they say that we defended democracy.May they say that we upheld justice.May they say that when truth came under pressure, we stood for truth.May they say that when democracy was tested, we stood for democracy.May they say that when our nation called, we did not fail her.
For the greatest monument to Herbert Macaulay is not one built with stone.The greatest monument to Herbert Macaulay is a Nigeria governed by justice.A Nigeria where institutions are stronger than individuals.A Nigeria where leadership remains accountable.A Nigeria where democracy is protected.A Nigeria where every citizen can once again believe in the promise of our nation.
If we build such a Nigeria, then we will not merely be remembering Herbert Macaulay.We will be continuing his work.We will be honouring his sacrifice.And we will be fulfilling the vision for which he devoted his life.
May God bless all who labour for justice.
May God bless all who defend democracy.
May God bless all who serve this nation with honour.
May God bless our Armed Forces and all our security agencies.
May God bless every patriotic Nigerian.
And may God continue to bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
The Delta State House of Assembly has directed the House Clerk to officially notify the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to conduct a bye- election for a vacant seat in the parliament.
The vacancy followed the defection of a member representing Udu State Constituency, Hon. Collins Egbetamah, from the All Progressives Congress (APC) to Nigeria Democratic Congress, (NDC).
The Assembly had declared vacant the seat of the member representing Udu State Constituency, Hon. Collins Egbetamah, following his resignation from the APC, and defection to the NDC.
The House declared the seat vacant in line with Section 109(1)(g) and (2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
The declaration followed the adoption of a motion by the Leader of the House, Hon. Emeka Nwaobi, seconded by the Deputy Speaker, Hon. Arthur Akpowowo, and unanimously approved at plenary presided over by the Speaker, Hon. Emomotimi Guwor.
The Speaker directed the Clerk of the House to communicate the resolution to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“Accordingly, this Honourable House is satisfied that the constitutional requirements under Section 109 of the Constitution have been fulfilled.
“Therefore, pursuant to Section 109(1) and (2), I hereby declare the seat of the Honourable Member representing Udu State Constituency vacant with immediate effect,” Guwor stated.
He directed the Clerk to transmit the resolution to INEC and other relevant authorities and requested the commission to take the necessary constitutional steps to conduct a by-election to fill the vacancy in accordance with Section 116(2) of the Constitution.
Presenting the motion titled, “Consideration of the Letter from the Honourable Member Representing Udu State Constituency Pursuant to Section 109 of the Constitution,” Hon. Nwaobi noted that documentary evidence before the House confirmed Egbetamah’s defection from the APC to the NDC while still serving as a member.
He cited Section 109(1)(g), which provides that a member shall vacate his seat if, having been elected on the platform of one political party, he becomes a member of another party before the expiration of his tenure, except as expressly provided by the Constitution.
The Speaker had earlier read Egbetamah’s resignation letter dated June 19, 2026, in which he informed the House that he resigned from the APC on April 30, 2026, to further his political aspirations.
He commended the APC and its stakeholders for their support.
Chairmen of the 18 local government areas in Ondo state have demanded intervention of President Bola Tinubu in the rejection of the list containing names of winners of primary election to the national Assembly by National Working Committee’s (NWC) of the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Speaking under the umbrella of the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria (ALGON), Ondo State chapter, the council chairmen insisted that the names eventually announced by the party’s national leadership did not reflect the outcomes of the primary elections conducted across the state.
Addressing journalists in Akure, the ALGON Chairman and Chairman of Akure South Local Government, Gbenga Fasua, said the appeal was not an act of rebellion against the party leadership, but a plea to preserve the credibility of the APC’s internal democratic process.
According to him, the primary elections held between May 16 and 23, 2026, were conducted by duly constituted electoral committees, monitored by party stakeholders and local government chairmen, and produced winners through what he described as a transparent process.
Fasua stated that the council chairmen were alarmed when candidates different from those declared at the primaries eventually emerged on the list released by the APC National Working Committee.
He stressed that, as chairmen and chief security officers of their respective local government areas, they witnessed the conduct of the primaries and the announcement of the results.
“We are not here to protest. We are making an appeal to the National Working Committee and to Mr. President because we were physically present during the elections. We monitored the process and we know those who emerged from the exercise.”
He added that the chairmen remained loyal members of the APC and would ultimately abide by whatever decision the party reached.
“If the National Working Committee does not agree with our position, we are not making a protest. Whatever decision the party takes is supreme, and we shall abide by it because we are party loyalists.”
The ALGON chairman maintained that their intervention was driven by the need to defend the sanctity of the votes cast by party members and to sustain confidence in the APC’s internal electoral process.
He said the appeal represented the collective position of the 18 local government chairmen and reflected the wishes of party members at the grassroots.
In a letter addressed to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the chairmen urged the President to intervene by ensuring that the authentic results submitted by the electoral committees were upheld, insisting that doing so would strengthen internal democracy, restore confidence among party faithful and promote unity within the Ondo APC.
The latest intervention comes days after the APC National Working Committee approved sweeping substitutions of National Assembly candidates in Ondo State following the review of petitions arising from the primaries.
Under the reviewed list, Senator Adeniyi Adegbonmire (SAN) replaced Dr. Taiwo Fasoranti as the APC candidate for Ondo Central Senatorial District, while Senator Olajide Ipinsagba displaced Hon. Gbenga Elegbeleye in Ondo North. The Ondo South Senatorial District ticket remained unchanged with Hon. Isaacs Kekemeke retaining the nomination.
For the House of Representatives, Hon. Donald Ojogo replaced Akingboye Leke in Ilaje/Ese Odo Federal Constituency, while Hon. Festus Akingbaso emerged in place of Hon. Rasaq Obe for Idanre/Ifedore.
The NWC also substituted Hon. Kayode Adejana with Hon. Dr. Oluwatimehin Adelegbe for Owo/Ose Federal Constituency, replaced Hon. Olumuyiwa Daramola with Hon. Okunjimi John Odimayo for Okitipupa/Irele, removed Dr. Abiola Makinde for Hon. Dr. Michael Olajide Akintomide in Ondo East/Ondo West, and replaced Oyerinmade Matthew with Hon. Festus Ayodele Adefiranye for Ile-Oluji/Okeigbo/Odigbo Federal Constituency.