Home Blog Page 2624

Ayade Tells New Head of Service To Flush Out Ghost Workers |The Source

0
Ben Ayade and New Head of Service

By Chidi Levi

Cross River State governor, Sir Ben Ayade, Tuesday swore in a new Head of Service, Mrs. Geraldine Akpet-Ekanem, with a charge to flush out ghost workers from the system.

Reflecting on the significance of the event, Ayade, while performing the swearing in, noted that “Today is a special day because the Head of Administration of the Government and Bureaucracy of Cross River State is being made substantive, and she is no other person but a very disciplined, highly professional lady, who from her citation has distinguished herself and has been an outstanding example of what a decent woman should be.”

Governor Ayade charged Akpet-Ekanem to hit the ground running, reminding her that “As Head of Service, one of the greatest challenges before you is to fish out ghost workers.”

Disclosing the staggering figure he inherited as pension,  amounting to about N340 million per month, the governor said “today that figure stands at about N740 million per month. I do not understand that increment of over N400 million especially when you juxtapose it with the fact that I met a civil service wage bill of about N1.2 billion rising to N1.6 billion and now standing at about N2.1 billion.

According to Ayade, “It is expected that when pension is increasing, salary is supposed to be reducing. But to have an increase in the wage bill in terms of salaries, increase in pension, while the employment regime just accounts for less than N 200 million is difficult to understand. It really calls for a thorough investigation.

“So I implore you to use your professional and educational background as a trained lawyer, your-self discipline from the heritage of a decent family and check the level of manipulation of our payroll system.”

Continuing, Ayade told Akpet-Ekanem that “as head of service, you have a very big challenge. Imprests are not being retired by ministries, simple imprests and it’s a hell of a task for them to retire it and qualify for the next month.

“Personnel audit which is supposed to be a quarterly thing is not being done. What they rather do is every month, payment structure of November is transferred into December.”

The Governor promised the new HoS of his support, adding that “you have my support to discipline, you have my support to transfer and promotions. Whatever power is vested in me, I pass that power to you so that nobody will come back and say either the Governor or the Head of Service is witch hunting him or her. I have set your terms of reference very clear.”

On discipline, “as Head of Service, the punctuality of staff has become a big challenge including commissioners. I know your responsibility as Head of Service is to civil servants but your permanent secretaries and your directors come under you. If they come to work punctually and at the right time, the commissioners will sit up. I want to encourage you to remain very disciplined .”

On the choice of Akpet-Ekanem, Ayade said: “The discretion to choose a head of service lies solely with the governor and your emergence had many reasons, one of which was that a memo was originated to the former head of service to give me the list based on seniority and your name came first. I then asked for your personal profile, whether you have had queries, whether you have had disciplinary issues, whether you have had any issues with questions on your character, integrity and it was all absolutely perfect. You came clean and I had no option than to make a choice of you based on character, your capabilities and your experience. So your choice was not emotional. It was based on your capacity to deliver on the charge  I am giving you today.”

Speaking shortly after her swearing in, the new Head of Service thanked the Governor for the appointment, adding that “His Excellency is a gender- friendly Governor for believing in me. He is indeed a leader of conscience and a man with a good heart. Your Excellency, I have heard your charge, I pledge to do all within my capacity to leave a positive mark in the civil service of Cross River State.”

Calls On Fayemi To Contest For Presidency As He Turns 56 |The Source

0

By Ayodele Oni

Encomiums poured in for Ekiti state Governor, Dr Kayode Fayemi, Tuesday, as he marked his 56th birthday.

Some of the messages challenged Fayemi to get prepared for the greater task ahead, a clever way by his admirers to drag him into the presidential race come 2023.

Fayemi, Chairman of  Nigeria’s Governors Forum,(NGF), has been rumoured to be nursing presidential ambition. But political watchers say this has set him against Asiwaju Bola Tinubu who is also eyeing the number one seat.

In a congratulatory message, his deputy, Otunba Bisi Egbeyemi, described Governor Fayemi as “a worthy leader with an uncommon passion for the development of Ekiti State.”

In a congratulatory message signed by his Special Assistant (Media)  Deputy Governor Ogunmola, described Governor Fayemi as “a visionary leader who has made Ekiti a model of good governance for other states to emulate in Nigeria.”

The Deputy Governor said Dr. Fayemi’s 56th birthday offers another opportunity to rededicate himself to the service of the people of the state who gave him a popular mandate in the 2018 governorship election on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

“He has used his goodwill and connections to attract quality investment to Ekiti State in an unprecedented manner. The entire landscape is witnessing development in terms of investment and projects to the benefit of our people.”

In a tribute, Chief Press Secretary to the governor, Mr Oyebode  wrote: “As JKF turns 56 today, the question is no longer about what he is capable of doing as a leader and peace maker. For he has been able to demonstrate his capability as an imaginative, innovative and diplomatic leader.

“Rather, the question will be about what he would not do as a leader as many believe that his past has adequately prepared him for the present and the future.”

Speaker of Ekiti state House of Assembly, Mr Funminiyi Afuye, in his message reminded the public: “Recall to my likening Fayemi to an American President, Bill Clinton, who was rejected as governor after his first term only to return later as governor and subsequently as the President of the United States. So shall it be for Fayemi whose record of service is already speaking for him even while still in government.”

The All Progressives Congress, (APC)  wrote “His foray into the political landscape of Nigeria at a time when politics is seen as a dirty game is no doubt a divine assignment.

“As a pro democracy/human rigths Activist, Fayemi has put smile in faces of several millions of Nigerians in his struggle to better their life.

“There is no doubt that the people of Ekiti and Nigerians as a whole have reaped and will continue to enjoy the caring and passion of this man of destiny.

“The party also expresses joy that God has given Fayemi a compassionate woman whose support at the home front and even in governance has in no doubt driven the man of destiny into several achievements.”

“As you continue with the destined journey, it is our prayer that God will see you through to the promised land. Once again Happy Birthday to our amiable Governor.”

Petrol: FG Warns Nigerians To Prepare For Imminent Price Hike

0

By Tosin Olatokunbo

The current price of petrol of N165 per litre is no longer sustainable amidst the rising global crude oil prices, the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Silva has said. The minister stated this on the heels of disagreement with Labour on the continuous increase in the price of petrol in the country.

Crude oil price has moved from $43 per barrel in the last quarter of last year to at least $60 per barrel in the last few days.

The minister who spoke at the official launch of Nigerian Upstream Cost Optimisation Program on Tuesday, said Nigerians should be prepared to pay more because the government has ended the fuel subsidy regime. Silva’s position, however, contradicts suggestions of experts in the sector that subsidy has not be totally removed.

Silva said: “Since we are optimizing everything, NNPC needs to also think about the optimization of product cost because as we all know oil prices are where they are today, $60. “As desirable as this is, this has serious consequences as well on product prices. So we want to take the pleasure and we should as a country be ready to take the pain.

“Today the NNPC is taking a big hit from this. We all know that there is no provision in the budget for subsidy. “So, somewhere down the line, I believe that the NNPC cannot continue to take this blow. There is no way because there is no provision for it. “As a country, let us take the benefits of the higher crude oil prices and I hope we will also be ready to take a little pain on the side of higher product prices.”

The minister said the government will not fritter the gains from higher crude prices on petroleum subsidy rather the margin would be maximized to provide essential services for Nigerians.

According to sources in the sector, the price of the essential commodity could go as high as N190 and N200 or more, from the current price of N160 –N165 being charged by petroleum marketers in the country. The marketers have complained that the current prices cannot be sustained as crude price continued to rise, pushing up the landing cost of imported petrol closer to the current pump prices of the product in country.

Since November 13, 2020 when the pump prices of PMS were last increased in the country, the price of the international oil benchmark, Brent crude, has increased by 43 per cent, rising from $41.51 per barrel to $59.34 per barrel on Friday.

Petrol marketers had in December expected another upward adjustment of PMS prices to reflect the further rise in crude oil prices, which closed at $51.22 per barrel on December 31. But the government only compounded their woes after the price was slashed by N5 effective December 5, 2020. With the current $60 per barrel, the pump price of petrol should be between N185 and N200 per litre or more, the markers insist.

Crude oil price accounts for a large chunk of the final cost of petrol, and the country has continued to spend so much on petrol imports for many years amid low domestic refining capacity.

The Executive Secretary/Chief Executive Officer, Major Oil Marketers Association of Nigeria, Clement Isong, said, the current price regime is not sustainable if the wants to fully optimize crude oil resources. Therefore, “the pump price should be between N185 and N200 per litre’, he said adding that “for as long as we continue to sell the product at what we are currently selling it, then somebody is bearing the cost of subsidy, and the country really cannot afford subsidy at this time.”

He said total deregulation of the sector is necessary to guarantee supply and stabilise prices.

“So, we need to completely restructure our entire supply chain. We need to reach a place where, if deregulation takes effect, refining will resume in Nigeria. We need to find a way of making sure that Nigerians benefit from deregulation. That, I believe, is what the discussion must be,” he said.

Meanwhile, the government has started discussion with the Nigerian Labour Congress, NLC and TUC on how to raise the freight rate from N7.51 per litre to N9.11 per litre, which experts say will eventually result in further increase of pump price of petrol. Freight is one of the elements that make up the landing cost of the petrol imported into the country.

The National Operation Controller, Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Mike Osatuyi gives an insight on what Nigerians should expect, in the next few months as crude oil prices continue to rise in the international market.

Osatuyi said, “Already, we are back to subsidy, and from the information I have which is confirmed, the Federal Government is subsidising about N1.8bn per day because 70 million litres are being pumped out every day now because the borders have been opened; I don’t know where the fuel is going.

“Government cannot afford subsidy, and there is no subsidy in the budget. So, the market fundamentals have to come to force now.

“Based on $56 per barrel of crude oil, our pump price should be about N186 to N190. But now that oil price has even gone to $59, then pump price should not be less than N200 per litre. There is no way Nigerians can avoid petrol price increase.”

OPINION: Fresh Trouble at Lekki Toll Gate |The Source

0
Reuben Abati

By Reuben Abati, Ph.D

The rancor that occurred, Saturday, February 6, at the sitting of the Lagos State Judicial Panel of Inquiry investigating the shootings and alleged killings at the Lekki Toll gate in Lagos in October 2020, in addition to reported cases of police brutality is most unfortunate and disturbing.

It will be recalled that the clampdown on protesters at the Lekki Toll Gate, the widespread mayhem that followed, in the shape of attacks on police men and police stations, the assault on warehouses where COVID-19 palliatives had been detained by unconscionable politicians, the attack on homes and businesses of both politicians and innocent persons, in general,  the needless loss of lives – attracted mass outrage.

A meeting comprising the 36 state Governors, the FCT Minister, the Inspector General of Police and the Human Rights Commission  in October 2020, chaired by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo resolved at the time that all state governments should set up panels of inquiry and organize public hearings to establish the truth and ensure that justice was done, and victims duly compensated.

Most states promised to set up the panels of inquiry, 29 did eventually, but some did not. As at January 30, 2021, the following states: Borno, Jigawa, Kano, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and Zamfara had refused to set up any panel of  inquiry. Kogi state announced that it had also constituted a panel of inquiry, but that panel has not met for even five minutes to date.

In some of the states where the panels exist and have been sitting: Plateau, Nasarawa, Kaduna, Ekiti, Ogun, Edo, Ondo, Rivers, Delta, Cross River, Abia, Bayelsa, Anambra and the Federal Capital Territory, the pace of work has been rather slow and inconsistent.

In Oyo State, the panel commenced sitting in January 2021, two months after its inauguration! The panels in Niger State, Katsina, and Rivers have since concluded sitting.  But of all the states, Lagos State has been the most responsive, the most active, and one of the very first states to commit to doing a thorough job of ensuring justice and establishing the truth.

The nine-member Lagos Panel of Inquiry and Restitution, as announced, was set up on October 16, 2020. Justice Doris Okuwobi (rtd) was named Chair of the Panel. It began sitting on Tuesday, October 27, 2020. The Okuwobi panel has received more coverage than any other panel in the country, perhaps because of its consistency, its proximity to the Lagos-Ibadan media, the international media as well, and the fact of the Lekki Toll Gate being the epicentre of the #ENDSARS protests.

In October 2020, the Lekki Toll gate and its satellite, the Ikoyi Bridge Toll gate managed by the same company, the Lekki Concession Company (LCC) were the primary  locations of the protest against police brutality in Nigeria, with specific focus on the notorious Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS). The protests soon spread to other parts of the country, even if the Northern parts of the country adopted another label and were significantly different in orientation from the protests in the South.

Nigeria’s Southern protesters talked about an end to police brutality. Northern youths who would later be joined by Governors of the North and traditional rulers called for an end to insecurity. Both groups were linked by a common thread – the crisis of insecurity in Nigeria, the failure of the security agencies and the urgent need for government to deliver on its mandate under Section 14(2) (b ) of the 1999 Constitution, to wit: the responsibility to protect the people and ensure their welfare. Nigeria thus found itself in the grips of a movement: an organized, but decentralized rebellion against the Nigerian state and its ineffectuality, more desperate than the youth protests of 1962 against the Anglo-Nigerian Defence Pact and far more incendiary than the Ali-Must-Go-Protests of 1978.

It was youth revolt in ebullition against mis-governance, bad politics, poor leadership and elite greed. The youths had five specific demands. The battle was fought on the streets and social media. The youths called for reform. They demanded change. They even asked for better welfare for policemen.

But then everything went out of hand.

The Nigerian Government’s expressed commitment to accede to the five demands and to investigate the reported killings and acts of inhumanity and ensure justice gave intimations of hope. In the course of its proceedings, the Lagos Panel of Inquiry offered useful details that kept that hope alive: all those stories about the number of persons that died or were shot, whether or not live bullets or blank bullets were used, how and why anyone asked for the deployment of soldiers  to confront harmless, unarmed and defenceless protesters, and shoot in whatever direction, the role of the police, the state government, state officials…

Every week, testimonies and revelations at the Lagos Panel of Inquiry provided useful insights.

But all of a sudden, that panel is now in disarray, and that is what is disturbing.

Last Saturday, it must have been common sense that restrained members of the panel from engaging in fisticuffs.  How sad

But the signs of impending chaos were foreseeable.

Earlier in the year,  the Nigerian Army stopped appearing before the panel. Army counsel disclosed that their mandate with their clients, that is the Nigerian Army, expired in November 2020 and the panel had been so informed. Justice Okuwobi however, affirmed the rights of the panel, appropriately under the Tribunals of Inquiry Act, and adjourned the date for the response of the Army to already issued summons to February 27.

I am not too sure any soldier will show up to respond to those summons. After the embarrassment that the Nigerian Army has received with its testimonies over whether or not its officers used live bullets and killed persons at the Lekki Toll Gate, the military hierarchy may have opted for the option of decided contempt in the face of and away from the face of the panel, knowing of course, that the likely penalty may be inconsequential.

To worsen matters, the Lagos Panel of Inquiry degenerated into near-chaos on Saturday, February 6, 2021.

The source of confusion was the decision of the panel,announced by five panel members, including Justice Okuwobi, to approve the re-opening of the Lekki and Ikoyi Bridge Toll Gates by their managers, the afore-mentioned LCC. Four members of the panel objected to this resolution and immediately made public their position in a now widely-circulated Dissenting Opinion signed by Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa SAN.

By the weekend, the same panel hitherto praised for being an exemplar, had become a divided house. The video of the proceedings that is in circulation is embarrassing to say the least. We saw  members of the panel having a shouting match. I do not want to re-hash the arguments: about whether or not a quorum was formed, the right of the civil society representatives to be in attendance and whether or not they were, the fact that a civil society member – Segun Awosanya (aka Segalink) is on the Chairperson’s side in the matter, and the reasonableness or not, of the dissenting quartet apparently led by Ebun Olu Adegboruwa SAN who has been accused of adopting tactics that would be considered strange in a Court of Appeal procedure even if the Okuwobi panel is quasi-judicial.

The legal correctness of the proceedings of the panel, and the dissensions within would require a closer scrutiny of the facts to which we are not full seised but it is sufficient to express alarm about how a process that was meant to calm nerves and promote truth and reconciliation has now become a catalyst for conflict.

By Monday morning, the matter before the Lagos Judicial Panel of Inquiry had spilled back onto the streets, with implications for public safety.

For, by the morning of Monday, February 8, a coordinated protest against the decision of the Lagos Panel of Inquiry to grant the Lekki Concession Company the permission to re-open its toll gates had gone viral on social media with such hashtags and banners as #RevolutionNow, #OccupyLekkiTollGate and a protest is purportedly planned for Saturday, February 13 at 7 am.

The LCC had approached the Lagos Panel to ask for permission to resume operations. The two toll gates under its management have been shut down since October 2020.  The position of the dissenters  is that a reopening of the toll gates will compromise evidence and forensic analysis and hence, the status quo should be maintained until the work of the panel is concluded.

The Okuwobi Five argued that the forensic investigation had been concluded and there was no justification to continue to shut LCC out of business indefinitely. Outside the panel,  those who want to #OccupyLekkiTollGate on February 13 are convinced that re-opening the toll gate will derail the course of justice.

Whichever way you look at it, another Lekki Gate protest is not an encouraging prospect. The way the arguments are packaged on both sides, every proposition sounds and looks plausible and ominous. But I guess this is the time to advert our minds to a number of fundamental issues.

One –in principle, the investigations and judicial inquiry emplaced by the state governments of Nigeria over the 2020 #EndSARS protests were meant to reassure the people and demonstrate government’s readiness to respond to popular yearnings. The Lagos Panel in particular had proved promising. Now, that it is divided, it is difficult to see how its objectives have not been compromised, and how this has not provided a bad example for other states where the panels have been slow and non-committal. Will the panel still be able to work as a team?

Two – those who argue that the Lekki Toll Gate is a crime scene that should be left intact till the conclusion of the work of the panel may be missing the point. That toll gate is no longer a crime scene.  It was never treated as such. Elsewhere, crime scenes are preserved, cordoned off, to protect the integrity of evidence and investigations. This so-called crime scene was never protected. It was in fact subjected to a thorough clean up, and whatever was hidden was picked up by visiting inspectors and trespassers, including a certain camera, the content of which has not been disclosed.  Vehicles and motorists have been passing through, glad that they have not had to pay any tolls for more than three months.

Whatever has not been established before now, may be difficult to prove again.

The dissenters in the panel may have the legal right to hold a different opinion, but they risk being accused of sabotage and fuelling another round of protests.

Three- the Lekki Toll Gate is a public-private partnership scheme. The investors have to pay back loans, maintain the staff who have been kept at home for months, process insurance claims and fix the offices and infrastructure destroyed during the #EndSARS protests. But majorly, they are  paying a price for identity politics.

Most of the protesters are angry in part, because of deep-seated suspicions about the ownership of the toll gate. Even in the absence of verifiable evidence, the Lekki Toll gate has become a symbol of power, oppression and graft in the eyes of many. Does it belong to the Lagos State Government or some oppressors?

Whatever the truth is, the managers of the Lekki and Ikoyi Toll Gates have had to pay so much. They have lost money and time. They have been vilified. Their brand has been dragged in the mud. What if on top it all, they are truly innocent? How about their staff who have been jobless for months? Even in the worst of circumstances, the toll gates would still be re-opened, anyway, at some point.

Four – But will the re-opening sabotage the investigations? May be not. The US Congress was attacked by a domestic terrorist mob on January 6, 2021. Five persons died on that occasion. Congress has since re-opened and continued its work, but that has not stopped the investigations. What we are actually dealing with in our case, is a terrible lack of trust in the Nigerian process.

Nobody trusts the government. The people would rather trust anybody who is willing and ready to attack the government or raise doubts about its methods. This alienation is self-inflicted by government itself. Here is an example:

During the October 2020 #EndSARS protests, the Nigerian government promised to accept and address the five demands by Nigerian youths. But shortly after, the same government clamped down on the protesters. Bank accounts belonging to known leaders of the protests were frozen. The airports of Nigeria became a no-go-area for such persons.  Even now, the Central Bank of Nigeria’s decision to ban financial institutions from cryptocurrencies has been linked to an attempt to cut off financial oxygen for protests.

Here is another example: the Governor of Lagos State was accused of lying to the public!

The combination of these factors has ignited the anger of the average Nigerian youth again. The flame of that anger could result in an inferno that we do not need. The fire this time could be worse than the explosion last time.

Five – will the Lagos panel of inquiry reverse itself because of the threat of a resumption of protest on February 13?  I doubt. But I worry more about the damage that may have been done to the Okuwobi panel.

Nothing must be done to derail the work of this Panel of Inquiry. Its original mandate should be preserved: to investigate, to unmask the truth, to make recommendations that will ensure justice, and to ensure the compensation of victims.

Nigeria lost so much last year. To shut down Lagos again and initiate another round of chaos is difficult to imagine. The security agencies, whatever the provocation, must not behave like goats this time around. The Lagos State Government must act and think wisely, must not tell lies, and take steps to prevent further trouble at the Lekki Toll Gate.

Reopening Of Lekki Toll Gate: Activist Condemn Action |The Source

0

By Akinwale Kasali

Reactions have trailed the reopening of the Lekki Toll Gate after the unfortunate incident that happened at the scene during the #EndSars Protest by youths and Nigerians.

Political Activist, Timi Frank, on Tuesday, condemned in strong terms the ordered re-opening of the Lekki Tollgate Plaza by the Lagos State Judicial Panel.

The Panel of Inquiry, led by Justice Doris Okuwobi (rtd), was set up to thoroughly investigate all verifiable claims of abuses and fatalities arising from defunct SARS brutal activities, bring erring officers to justice and ensure adequate compensation for the victims.

Youths protesting against SARS brutality and irresponsible governance in the country were shot at, and some allegedly killed by men of the Nigerian Army during the Lekki Tollgate shootings aimed at quelling the #EndSARS uprising.

The soldiers, allegedly acted on orders from above.

To the former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, the action of  the Panel is patently insensitive to the plight of innocent Nigerians who lost their lives or were maimed for life during the attack by security forces.

He accused the panel of bias and acting the script of the Lagos State and the Federal Governments who consider the revelations emanating from the panel as a source of continuous embarrassment.

He insisted that the Lagos State Government that constituted the panel is simply out to protect the interest of “big business” not minding the huge scars inflicted on Nigerians and Nigeria by the unprovoked Lekki Tollgate massacre.

He urged Nigerians to ignore the re-opening order which was  rejected by four out of the nine-member panel.

He vowed that Nigerian youths will not rest until the masterminds are brought to justice.

“This is simply a display of crass insensitivity. The panel has shown by this action that they are not out to serve the cause of justice but to protect the interest of big business, Lagos State and Federal Government.

“Nigerians youths who died will not die in vain. I call on Nigerians resident in Lagos to ignore this reprehensible order that emanated from a kangaroo panel out to pervert the cause of justice rather than ensure it.

“The Governor of Lagos State, Babajide Sanwo-Olu and the ex-Service Chiefs who masterminded the killing of innocent Nigerians at the #LekkiMassacre must pay for their crimes against humanity either on earth or in the hereafter,” Frank declared.

The Bayelsa-born political activist called on Nigerians to stand up for the victims of the murderous action of the Nigerian Government by staging solidarity protests wherever they live in memory of the exterminated youths.

He expressed support for the #OccupyLekkiTollGate and called on Nigerian youths not to be intimidated by the action of security forces who may be out to frustrate the plan.

However, the Lagos State Government has warned against the planned protest by youths on February 13, against the order to reopen the Lekki Toll Gate.

Burutai: Why Buhari Made Me Army Chief

0

By Tosin Olatokunbo

Ambassador designate General Tukur Burutai (rtd) has been talking since he was retired by President Muhammadu Buhari, two weeks ago, as Nigeria’s Chief of Army Staff, COAS. The military uniform somehow prevented him from saying his mind for more than 35 years that he was in the army. But no more, the garb is off, and the former army chief have been talking, a situation described by many as normal for somebody trying to adapt to civilian life.

The erstwhile soldier has revealed how President Muhammadu Buhari picked him as COAS despite the high wire jostle by other military commanders for the top position.

Burutai who has been dragged before the International Criminal Court, ICC by the civil society groups in the country, for alleged human rights violation while serving as COAS, said President Buhari appointed him as a reward for his father’s loyalty to the president.

That may have also accounted for why the president failed to sack him despite clamour by many Nigerians, considering the insecurity that pervaded most part of the country, particularly the north where Boko Haram and bandits held sway, many say.The immediate past Army chief is one of the longest serving COAS. He held that position for more than five years.

Burutai said the president chose him because of the relationship between his father and Buhari.

Buratai who spoke during a gala night organized by the 29th Regular Course Association in Abuja, said his late father, a non-commissioned officer in the Royal West African Frontier Force and a World War II veteran who fought in Burma, loved Buhari and that the president appointed him as a prize for the loyalty of his father.

Buratai said, “My father was an ardent lover of the President and my appointment as COAS, therefore, was a price or reward for that gesture by the President.

“Of course, and as you have been told severally, we (the President and I) met in Njemena and he saw me and felt I was the right person to be COAS at that very crucial and critical moment of our history.

“And I am happy that we have discharged our responsibilities diligently, professionally and loyally, and I will continue to discharge my responsibilities to him and of course to our country and our people.

The former army chief was appointed by the president in 2015 alongside other service chiefs, who were penultimate week retired and later appointed as non-career ambassadors by Buhari. They are now awaiting confirmation by the Nigerian Senate.

Lagos Cult Clash: Fatalities Rise; Police Arrest 26 |The Source

0
Lagos Cult Clash

By Akinwale Kasali

For days, residents of Alakuko, Dalemo and Kola area of Oke-Odo Local Council Development Area in Alimosho Local Government Area of Lagos State have witnessed unrest, as wanton destruction of lives and properties reigned.

Cult members, including the One Million Boys gang that terrorised Lagos and Ogun State during the Covid-19 Pandemic Lockdown last year, were on rampage, killing, maiming, raping and destroying properties.

Casualties recorded in the area was on the rise as residents scampered for safety, with the Cult groups engaging themselves in a fierce war, shooting sporadically.

Hospitals in the area had different casualties, ranging from matchete cuts and all kinds of injuries.

The crisis forced the Police attached to Kola and Alakuko Police Station to run for safety as the Cultists had a filled day.

It however took the intervention of the Lagos State Commissioner of Police, Hakeem Odumosu, who went to the scene of the Crisis with his Men to bring back normalcy to the area.

26 Cult members were arrested, some with gun wounds and matchete cuts, while dead bodies also littered the Street.

The Source gathered that it was reprieval attack that led to the Crisis.

According to a resident who pleaded anonymity, “The whole issue started last Friday when one of the rival cult member had a clash with another, this however escalated leading to the high casualties and destruction”.

Janet Eluame, a resident of Alakuko, who has a shop within the area was counting her losses. She said that her shop was destroyed with the Cultists using that avenue to loot.

Eluame is just one out of many persons who own shops and small businesses in the area, who are lamenting that the Cultists have used the avenue to loot their shops and cart away their wares.

As at today, business is gradually getting back on track, as residents can now move out of their houses and hideout to go about their respective businesses.

Unity Bank: NYSC Member Wins Big In Corpreneurship Challenge

0

By Fola James

Unity Bank Plc has announced Akomolede Blessing as the latest winner in the Bank’s Corpreneurship Challenge in the Edo state pitch challenge with a N500 000 cheque presented to him by Oliseneku Emmanuel Ezemezu, the bank’s Regional Manager, Edo/Delta states.

The lender introduced the challenge, last year, to assist members of the National Youth Service Corps, NYSC become business owners. Many NYSC members have benefitted from the programme.

The Oluwatomi Somefun-led Unity Bank’s flagship business plan competition for NYSC members has produced many winners, including Ejidike Vitalis, Aromire Yusuf, and Sanni Adeola who all emerged during the final pitch for NYSC 2020 Batch B, Stream 1B corps members, held at the Lagos NYSC Orientation camp last year.

Unity Bnak MD Tomi Somefun
Unity Bank MD Tomi Somefun

One of the high points of last year’s event occurred when a Zobo beverage processing plant business plan by Ejidike Vitalis, a Pharmacy graduate from Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka emerged the best plan, winning the N500,000 grant.

Other winners include a fish farm business plan by Aromire Yusuf which earned him N300,000 business grant, while Sanusi Adeola’s Garri Processing plant business plan received N200,000 business grant.

To ensure best practices, the Bank has always ensured that contestants’ business plans were assessed on originality, marketability, future employability potential of the product and knowledge of the business.

Speaking on the initiative recently, Divisional Head, Retail, SME & E-Business, Olufunwa Akinmade said “Our value proposition is to therefore reach out and equip more corps members by improving the quality of the mentoring programme in the corpreneurship challenge and in the process, build increased capacity amongst the Youths who will become a catalyst to Nigeria’s economic development.”

Two years ago, Unity Bank Plc introduced the Entrepreneurial Development Initiative, to specifically targets corps members, as part of efforts to contribute to job creation in Nigeria and empower jobless youths to become entrepreneurs.

Governor Makinde Debunks Rumour Of Leaving PDP To ADC, Says It Is False |The Source

0
Governor Seyi Makinde

By Akinwale Kasali

Governor Seyi Makinde has debunked the Speculation making the round that he was planning to defect to the African Democratic Congress, ADC, from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, after the Local Government Council Election.

The Governor in a statement  signed by his Chief Press Secretary, Taiwo Adisa,  described the news story that insinuated that the governor is set to dump the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as “a concocted falsehood from purveyors of fake news, who are bent on maligning the governor at all cost”.

Adisa maintained that contrary to the fake news report, which went viral, said that Governor Makinde has no plan to join any other party.

According to him, the governor has remained a strong pillar of the party for many years and is already leading the mission for its resurgence in the South-West.

Adisa stated that the report in question raised all the red flags of fake news, as it was based on unverifiable claims from an unnamed source, adding that if the journalist and the editors of the medium had done due diligence, such falsehood would not have found its way into the public sphere.

The media aide added that attempt to launch the concocted story shortly after some media outfits had tried to exaggerate the governor’s exit from a WhatsApp platform that purportedly belongs to the PDP, is negatively ingenious.

He added that the publication is a clear signal that the war being waged against the Makinde Administration through fake news and false alarms is showing no sign of abating.

Adisa said: “There is a concocted lie doing the rounds about Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State planning to dump the PDP.

“This is the latest in the rounds of false reports and fake news, weapons which some individuals have employed to wage needless war against the governor.

“It becomes imperative to attack the hydra-headed monster of fake news and false reports and this particular report raised all the red flags of fake news, as it was based on alleged hints from an individual who claimed not to want his name in print.

“The noble profession of journalism dictates that if a party makes insinuations about another party, the second party’s response should be sought. The reporter in question had access to the media unit of the governor but he chose to fly with the falsehood.

“This is the kind of story that would have had its place in the dust bins if the reporter and editors of the medium did due diligence on it.

“However, knowing that there is an agenda by some people to derail the Makinde Administration with fake news, it is clear that any news no matter how false or unverified, will be allowed to scale through the gate-keepers in the media, some of who are their allies.”

The statement maintained that apart from the governor not contemplating joining ADC or any other party for that matter, he would also not be distracted by the ridiculous lies being circulated by the enemies within and without.

“But we need to make something clear: no matter the amount of falsehood through fake news and false alarms, Governor Makinde will continue to remain focused on the mandate of developing Oyo State.

“If the purveyors of fake news and unscrupulous elements seeking to derail the administration think that their actions will slow down the governor in his determined pace to develop Oyo State, then they should have a rethink,” the statement concluded.

Lagos Land Tussle: Union Alleges Oshodi Tapa Does Not Own Epetedo, Claims It Belongs to 21 Compounds |The Source

0
Abdulrahman Ayinde Mogaji

By Akinwale Kasali

For years, there have been a raging controversy over who really owns the popular Epetedo area of Lagos Island, Lagos State, leading to brickbats and cold war among the families involved.

In recent times, hoodlums allegedly sponsored and ordered by popular members of the Oshodi Tapa family in Lagos Island including Chief Kabiru Oshodi popularly known as Olori Eyo and Baba Surakatu Oshodi have been involved in violent land and property grabbing, assault, brandishing of dangerous weapon, disturbance of public peace and other violent activities in the area.

This behaviour from the Oshodi Tapa family, according to many sources, is premised on the claim that they own the Epetedo area.

However, investigation carried out and interviews made to notable personalities from Epetedo insist that Oshodi family does not own the area.

They revealed that the progenitor of the Oshodi Tapa family was originally a Six year old slave boy from Nupeland who was bought by the kind hearted Oba Eshinlokun of Lagos at Badagry during the thriving days of slave trade, and as such are shocked by the attempted historical revisionism going on.

This disclosure from the said quarters did not augur well with some family members from the other side, prompting this magazine  to take further steps in getting to the root of the matter by  interviewing families involved.

In a quest to unravel the truth, an exclusive Interview was held with Alhaji Imam Rahman Mogaji, the Executive Secretary-General of Epetedo Union, a foremost association of descendants of Epetedo founded in 1927.

Mogaji is a foremost activist, Islamic cleric, historian of repute and prominent son of Epetedo area from the Balogun Momoh Mogaji Oloko Compound.

According to him, he witnessed the issues first hand and has been involved in the moves for peace in the area.

Below is the interview:

Can you Introduce yourself?

I am Alhaji Abdulrahman Ayinde Mogaji, the Chief Imam of Mogaji Central Mosque, Freeman Street, Epetedo area of Lagos Island and also the Executive Secretary-General of the Epetedo Union, established in 1927.

What is the problem in Epetedo area of Lagos Island?

It’s a long story but I will get into it quickly. Oshodi Tapa family in Lagos Island led by Chief Kabiru Oshodi aka Olori Eyo and Baba Surakatu Oshodi have been involved in violent property grabbing, assault, and disturbance of public peace. They are making false claims that they own the Epetedo lands. That is an absolute falsehood and a terrible attempt at historical reversion and revisionism. It is on record that in the presence of Lagos government officials from physical planning, our Epetedo Union lawyer was assaulted by Chief Kabiru Oshodi just this January 13/14. It is getting out of hand.

What is really the truth of the matter?

The Oshodi Tapa families are one of the prominent leaders of the area but do not own the lands. The returnee chiefs and warriors of King Kosoko were all given lands independently and subsequently were given independent Crown Grants per compound by Governor Glover in 1869 after the death of Oshodi Tapa.

The documents are still available. There are 21 Compounds that make up the Epetedo area and Oshodi only owns two as a leader, there are 19 independent other compounds.

The Aromire families who originally gave the lands to King Kosoko for all his chiefs who returned with him after about 10 years exile in Epe have disagreed with the position of the Oshodi family on this matter. The King Kosoko families also disagree with Oshodi family on the matter. Even the Oba of Lagos does not agree with Oshodi family on this matter. I will give you a blow-by-blow historical accounts and background on this issue. Everything I am saying is as referenced in the following historical books.

So I am not telling you my personal views. Please check The Lagos Consulate 1851 – 1861 by Robert Smith written in 1978; Letter written by Chief Momodu Oteniya Kosoko to the Commissioner of the Colony’s Office in Marina Lagos dated March 9th, in 1943; History of Lagos by J.B Losi in 1921; History of Eko Dynasty by Chief Bolakale Kotun Published 26th April, 1973 and Table of Principal Events in Yoruba History by John Augustus Otonba Payne in January, 1893. These books all counter the false claims of Oshodi family.

Epetedo

Who are the masterminds of the alleged property hrabbing and usurpations?

Baba Surakatu Oshodi is the ring leader. There is also Morufu Babatunde Oshodi aka Awishe who is the Chairman Oshodi family; Nasiru Adegboyega Oshodi and Chief kabiru Oshodi aka Olori Eyo. They are all key actors.

What steps has the Epetedo Union made for aresolution?

We have been creating awareness for our members and giving support to those affected. As a mark of respect, we took the matter first to the Oba of Lagos before thinking of involving state government. Kabiyesi is the father for all and a representative of the government. We had written petitions and made oral documentary and documentations to the Oba of Lagos and the Traditional Councils first in August 2017 with other follow-ups. Our President, Dr. Babs Hussein and I are leading the efforts.

What is the history of Epetedo in Lagos Island?

The area known as Epetedo in Lagos Island today could be traced directly to the kingship tussle between King Kosoko and King Akintoye way back in Lagos.

Trouble started between both princes around 1845 and 1851. Kosoko seized power from King Akintoye and reigned for six years between 1845 and 1851 before the British chased him out in 1851 over slave trade issues. The British wanted slave trade abolished. Kosoko disagreed but Akintoye supported the abolishment. That led to King Kosoko ouster in 1851 when he fled to Epe with his warriors, loyal chiefs and supporters, including Oshodi, Ajeniya, Mogaji, Dada Anthonio, Ajagun etc. and settled there. All those who settled permanently in Epe and never returned to Lagos with King Kosoko are today called Eko Epe. Sadly, Akintoye had a short reign after Kosoko fled to Epe. After Akintoye’s death, King Dosunmu ascended the throne and invited Kosoko to return to Lagos, no longer as King but as Oloja of Ereko and that’s why he settled at Ereko. Oshodi, Ajeniya, Mogaji, Dada Anthonio, Ajagun, Imam Onirakunmi (now in Salu Lafiaji) and others were among his chiefs and loyalists who returned with him to Lagos but they had all lost their previous dwellings at Olowogbowo Balogun area and so needed a new place to settle. Their dwellings had already been taken over by freed slaves from Sierra Leone. To avoid trouble, King Dosunmu approached the then Aromire who owns the Lagos land to help provide Kosoko followers with virgin lands for dwelling. It was Aromire who gave the area known today as Epetedo area of Lagos Island to the returnees and Kosoko followers in 1862. They had landed on September 12 to the area known as Epe Street today. That’s why it was named Epe Street. Everyone picked their preferred location and formed the 21 Compounds/Courts known today as Epetedo, meaning Epe returnees settled here. Epetedo land is big though the area has witnessed some changes. It starts from Simpson Street, down to Adeniji, to swamp, to Alukotamo, to Olusi; but now since Eti has settled in Oke Popo Onipopo that slashed the land.

If all the returnees from Epe had arrived together, there would have been no Oke Popo but they had returned in batches. There were about 12 ships that transported the returnees but it was the first, second and third batches who formed Epetedo area. The ships were landing in batches. Others who came were the Eti, Oni Popo, Adamo Arole, Dada Anthonio. They formed another group and settled in Oke Popo. That’s why Epetedo cuts in through Simpson Street, down to Sura, Adeniji, Glover, Tokunbo, Igbosere. The Oke Popo group including Eti, Adeshina and others also was part of the returnee families. They all returned together with Kosoko. It was their arrival time that affected their settlements and current locations today. They settled upon arrival based on the available lands then as given by Aromire. The returnees were different professionals from different locations including warriors, clerics, blacksmith, herbalists etc. who had all came together to serve Kosoko and they all had their dwellings before fleeing and returning with Kosoko. The origin of Lafiaji is Tapa, for instance. The current land on which the LSDPC building stands today in Balogun area of Lagos Island was originally the Ajagun family house before they fled with Kosoko to Epe. The place was already occupied by the time they returned from Epe. All returnees had their dwelling places before fleeing and the area known as Epetedo today was a really thick bush behind the town uninhabited and desolate. Even Obalende was a thick jungle with wild animals. Nobody was living there. That’s why the land was given to the returnees who had lost their lands and were homeless. But they are still the same with all other descendants of Lagos.

So how does the Oshodi Tapa land ownership claim surface?

Oshodi Tapa is not the owner of Epetedo. He may be a leader for Kosoko followers. Maybe because of his relationship with King Eshinlokun. It was Oba Eshinlokun who bought Oshodi Tapa and Dada Anthonio in Badagry during the slave trade. Eshinlokun was the father to Kosoko and co. Many available records show that King Eshinlokun bought Oshodi Tapa as a 6 year boy slave (The Consulate 1851 – 1861). There are many other records confirming this. He had lost his parents in a war in the North and was captured as a Nupe slave boy and taken to Badagry where he cried out ‘landuji’ from the slave ships to King Eshinlokun. The King then ordered that he be bought and he paid the fees for the slave boy and took him to his palace to live with him as a slave. Subsequently, Landuji has been verified and interpreted to mean ‘buy me and make me your child.’ in Nupe language. There is no place in Tapa land or name or any other word like that anywhere else. Eshinlokun also bought Dada Anthonio and put both slaves to live with him and the royal family. Oshodi Tapa was then raised with the princes and princesses as a slave.

Later on in the booming days of slave trade, the European slave merchants advised King Eshinlokun to allow some of his children travel with them to Europe to learn foreign languages and trading skills. This, they said, would ease language barrier and boost slave trade. Worried that it may be a dangerous journey of no return, the king’s wives disallowed any of the princes to travel to Europe. Oshodi Tapa and Dada Anthonio being slaves were then sent to Europe. Oshodi later returned as a learned man and became influential because of his important role as interpreter to the foreign merchants and the love that Eshinlokun showed him as one of his warriors. That was how he became very relevant. This is well confirmed by many books including The Consulate, Lawson, and history of Lagos by Folami.

Following the death of Eshinlokun, Kosoko inherited his father’s chiefs and warriors including Oshodi. But in the Kosoko Army, there were many captains and warriors including Eti, Mogaji, and Ope. It was not just Oshodi. All of them had different powers. For example, Eti has special powers especially in darkness; Aina Oluwo Jakande had been an Ifa priest to King Eshinlokun long before Kosoko became a king so how can he be a slave to Oshodi? They all loved and supported Kosoko. Slave trade has been abolished before Kosoko returned with Oshodi and others, how could they still be Oshodi slaves? There are terrible misconceptions about who is a slave. A chief can grant a space for a sojourner to live and become his overlord. Does that make him a slave bought from the market? A spiritually afflicted person, prison escapee or one who escaped from a sacked community also do seek help from wealthy personalities and chiefs and thus become submissive to him and run errands. The chief’s children may mistake such for a slave. Does that make him a slave? A slave is only one bought with money in an exchange or captured. So, how did all Epetedo people become Oshodi’s slaves? Where and when did he buy them? There are some Eshinlokun slaves inherited by Kosoko who followed him to Epe. Some of these slaves are traced to the Ogun Oloko family today but they are not even slaves to Oshodi. How can all be Oshodi slaves? For example, Oshodi has land in Eti Osa, Mogaji has land in Ogudu, and many others have their family lands on the mainland where they farm which was given to them to compensate for the lands lost at Olowogbowo apart from their Epetedo compounds, how can that be for slaves? Oshodi is also not an Idejo. There is no Idejo in Epetedo so nobody can claim any superiority over others. Even the Oba of Lagos is not an Idejo. Whoever is not an Idejo cannot claim anybody’s land except what is given. Eletu Odibo is not an idejo but the Abule Oja and a part of Abule Ijesha land was given as a gift to Eletu Odibo as a chief; Asogbon also has lands in Makoko. Chiefs have lands given to them where they lay claim to across Lagos but they are not Idejos. So Epetedo is 21 Compounds and only two is for Oshodi. Oshodi is only representing government and the community as head but does not own the lands. That was why Oshodi’s first heir and successor, Feyisetan during whose time trouble started in 1894 with the Ajagun family, who lost to Obayomi Ajagun at Supreme Court on 24 March 1894 over the same spurious claim of land ownership through Grant in Trust. The judgment records are available. Same with Ogun Oloko family at the Supreme Court where Christopher Olasehinde Oshodi lost on July 3, 1946 over same land possession claim. The fathers failed then now the children are at it again.

The children are not warriors and were not present during the time with their fathers. Some of these children don’t even own any property in Epetedo. They just stand as guarantee for some Compounds by the virtue of their lineage and the father’s popular name to represent others way back. So, the claims are absurd and ridiculous. Clearly, the Crown Grant was for each Occupiers of the land in 1969. In fact, in some of the 21 Compounds, the name used for the independent Crown Grant represents the group in the compound and not necessarily the owner family alone. Though some name represents the single family owner e.g. the Mogajis. But some Crown Grants were granted for joint ownerships within each Compound.

Despite these facts, why are Oshodi Tapa Families still bent on grabbing lands in  Epetedo?

When the Oshodis started encroaching on other Compounds in Epetedo, it led to court litigations. The Oshodis lost some and won some. This led to the setting-up of a tribunal or a panel on lands. This was first was in 1937, and later 1947. For the Customary Law that the Oshodis insist empower them as Chiefs, there is no document or serious backing. As they are chiefs, so are many others. Jakande, Ajagun and Mogaji are chiefs too! And according to the Crown Grants, the occupiers are independent owners! But the Oshodis claim they put people in the compound as their overlords without any evidence.

So at a time the problem stopped with land enfranchisement issued. But there were some lands outside the compounds, so government said in the land Ordinance that Oshodi should represent government and collect simple fee like land use and if not collected, it should be paid to government. But Oshodis have no rights to eject anyone or forcefully occupy the property. But after a while the problem started again after those who understood the arrangement died. Some who don’t know the history well started the problems again.

That’s why we had to revive the Epetedo Unions to solve the problems. There is a section in the land Ordinance that states clearly that Oshodi owns only two compounds – Akinyemi and Oshodi; in fact, Oshodi is not the name on the Crown Grant but Amore (one of Oshodi’s children) was used for Akinyemi and Feyisetan for Oshodi Court. Feyisetan was the ruling leader of the Oshodi family when the Crown Grant was issued. It was after the death of the first Oshodi.

If Oshodi Tapa was the owner of Epetedo, his name would have been used to issue all the Crown Grants. But everyone has a space. He was only a leader. Presently, there are many court cases on the land issue and the King of Lagos is also aware. Presentations and submissions have been made to the Oba and his traditional council. Some have been checkmated while some still lingering. Even the Oba of Lagos does not agree with the violent land and property grabbing misconducts of the Oshodis. Police have also tried to maintain peace and encouraged aggrieved parties to seek redress in courts.

Looking at the constitution over lands matter, former Head of State, Olusegun Obasanjo in 1978 nullified land Ordinance. In fact, government owns all lands according to Obasanjo 1978 decree. The provision is that anybody who has not paid simple fee or land use to anyone apart from government for 12 years cannot just be chased away overnight.

This supersedes all previous laws as applicable and so anyone who has been paying tax to government for years cannot just be suddenly displaced by an invader. Backed with this decree, government acquired many lands in 1962 including the land currently hosting UNILAG, UI, OAU etc. and then compensated the owners.

If government can do that and compensate, how could you then suddenly come after over 100 years to claim a land and chase away the occupiers? The case will still get to court for proper review to avoid crisis similar to Ife/Modakeke. Presently, some people are still being harassed because some of the houses don’t have other documents than the Crown Grants. This superiority agenda is setting back Epetedo. In fact, it’s just getting better now. They once imposed outsiders on Epetedo as Council Chairman, House or Representatives etc.

It’s that bad. For example; Bashua falls into Islale Eko, not Epetedo. Because someone is insisting that others are slaves. And that’s the real slave. It’s illegal to call anyone a slave. King Docemo has since ceded Lagos to the Queen, so nobody should call anyone a slave. That was what led to the ouster of Kosoko in 1851 in the first instance.

What moves has Epetedo Union made to enlighten and reconcile the parties for progress?

It’s not all of Oshodi families that have the erroneous superiority mindset or indulge in land grabbing acts. Some of them neither like nor support it. They are divided too. Some Oshodi children belong to Epetedo Union and are solidly against the illegalities. During the 150 year anniversary of the Mogaji Central Mosque in 2015, we published a magazine that chronicles the true story, accounts and authentic history of Epetedo as never told recently but in consonance with the true accounts of old key actors and witnesses who wrote about the issue decades and over a century ago. We delved deeply into how Epetedo started and the treaty that was signed and all the key actors and not just Oshodi.

The goal was to create deeper awareness and enlightenment, and clarify grey areas for those who are willing to embrace the truth. Epetedo Union is also making moves for more publications and awareness creation opportunities to further educate everyone on the issue, foster better understanding, unity and progress. It is inappropriate for some Epetedo people to call themselves indigenes in view of our history? Indigene is a wrong word. Descendant is the correct word. Are we different from Lafiaji, Isale Eko, Olowogbowo or Oke Popo? We are same with all others in Lagos. We left during war and returned so we are one with all other Lagosians.

Is Lagos Government aware and how has Government intervened?

We have deliberately held on until now to allow us start by firstly involving the Oba of Lagos. Oba has been on the case and that was why we didn’t involve state government yet. As it is, we will be taking more drastic steps including involving state government and Attorney-General in 2021 by writing them with the list of the properties wrongly grabbed. We wanted to start by lodging all complaints to the King first since government will also ask for the King’s position. He is also an Authority. So, it’s right to have started by involving the King and the Council first.

What are the positions of Aromire and Kosoko families on this issue?

The Aromire and Kosoko Families are unhappy with Oshodi family over this issue. During our Epetedo Union 90 year’s anniversary, we invited and honoured the Aromire and Kosoko Family chiefs. They attended and both frowned at the activities of the Oshodi family. In fact, a direct son of Kosoko who was his last born wrote a letter to the British in 1943 clarifying that Epetedo does not belong to Oshodi but all the 21 compounds.

That was through a letter written by Chief Momodu Oteniya Kosoko to the Commissioner of the Colony’s Office in Marina Lagos dated March 9th, in 1943. Even the Aromire insisted that they gave the lands to King Docemo who gave it to us. So, when we write the state government on the issue, we will write Kosoko and Aromire families and invite them to be involved if the government will be setting up a Panel or Tribunal to investigate the issue and find lasting solutions.