Home Blog Page 2462

OPINION: First Jollof, Now Twitter. What Next? |The Source

0
Azu Ishiekwene

By Azu Ishiekwene

Something Nigeria’s Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, said reminded me of British political journalist, Andrew Marr.

Journalism, Marr wrote in his book, My Trade, is a chaotic form of earning, ragged at the edges and full of snakes and con artists.

Last week, Mohammed, furious at Twitter’s decision to start its first Africa office in Ghana, decided it was time to level the ragged edges and crush the journalistic snakes and con artists in Nigeria by heaping on them the blame for Twitter’s decision. It was hard for him to swallow.

He called out journalists for portraying the country poorly and reminded them that if they had not been such bad boys, making a mountain of the #ENSARS molehill, among other professional crimes, Twitter’s Africa office might be sitting in Lagos or Abuja today.

In his former life as spokesperson of the opposition and member of the Action Congress of Nigeria, one of the legacy parties of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Mohammed had journalists on his speed dial. In press statement after press statement, he pointed out the shortcomings of the Government of the day, and his views got generous play.

He knew, for example, where all the dead bodies of President Goodluck Jonathan’s Government were buried and was pleased to enlist journalists in exhuming them. Even President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua before Jonathan did not escape Mohammed’s fierce criticisms and constant mockery.

That was until his party got into Government and the Government appointed him to office and public office brought its own misery, as it unfailingly does.

The current storm over Twitter’s siting is not Mohammed’s first run-in with controversy since his appointment. And somehow, Ghana never manages to escape the crosshairs.

Four years ago, when the Minister was answering questions on CNN on who makes tastier jollof rice, he answered Senegal, under the mistaken impression that he was being asked the origin of the African staple.

Before he could get a grip on things the debate had assumed a sub-regional dimension, with sparks flying from Banjul to Accra and drawing in Nigeria’s Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo, and even Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.

Last year, also, Mohammed took the battle to Ghana during a flare-up over bilateral and consular issues.

The bugle has sounded again. Of all the transgressions that Mohammed may justifiably accuse journalists of, responsibility for Jack Dorsey’s decision to locate Twitter’s first Africa office in Ghana instead of Nigeria is the unkindest cut: it treats the symptom rather than the disease.

To be sure, journalists have caused quite a few miseries for the country. They were largely responsible for painting Jonathan as an incompetent leader who allowed a few influential members of his cabinet, especially the women, to twist him around their little fingers. They were responsible for giving the APC, then in opposition, a soft pass, equating effective, competent government with a change of party guards.

Journalists helped, in no small way, to bring President Muhammadu Buhari to power and a number of them have publicly regretted it. What the Minister is obviously saying is that journalists having played a role in helping to install Buhari, are failing to govern for him. It’s the equivalent of the conjugal parable that the one who brings the mat and the partner must finish the job by supplying the libido.

That’s the only logic that justifies blaming journalists’ portrayal of the country for the long list of businesses that have either passed us by or the scores that have simply packed up and relocated.And it’s a very long list, believe me.

Before Twitter happened, Google, which has a regular office in Lagos, Nigeria, chose Accra for its very first Artificial Intelligence research lab in Africa. The reasons, according to a CNBC report, were “Ghana’s political stability and high educational standards.”

Before that, Facebook set up its first African hub in Johannesburg, South Africa, in July 2015, when Buhari was still looking for Mohammed’s address and those of other persons to make his ministerial list.

Other companies such as Berec Batteries, Exide Batteries, Tate and Lyle, Michelin, Fan Milk, and Shoprite, to mention a few, have either relocated wholly or substantially at the different times and for reasons other than those given by Mohammed.

According to the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, 38 major textile companies closed down businesses in Nigeria between 1999 and 2009. In one of the more recent astonishing shut-downs, Procter & Gamble shut down its $300m plant in South west, Ogun State, one year after the plant was opened in 2017, “due to high cost of importing raw materials and unfriendly government regulations.”

Also, between 2009 and 2019, the oil majors – Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, ENI and Total, have sold about 45 percent of their onshore assets valued at about $10billion mostly to local interest groups in deals that have left a number of commercial banks dangerously exposed.

Meanwhile, investors who still have appetite for oil and gas are looking at new, promising destinations on the continent, such as Angola, Namibia, Senegal, Mauritania, Mozambique, Algeria and Egypt. South Africa, on its part, is aggressively developing its shale gas.

No serious investor needs Mohammed’s grouse book because a good number of them have been operating in the country long enough. They know beyond anyone’s portrayal or window-dressing what the problems are, firsthand: insecurity, poor infrastructure and poorly trained labour pool, policy flip-flops and an obese, corrupt bureaucracy.

Mohammed insists, however, that but for the negative portrayal of the press and their #ENSARS cousins, we might be in a much better place today, even though Dorsey was clear that Twitter chose Ghana because of that country’s firm support for free speech, online freedom and open Internet.

The Minister can continue to hug his fantasy, but the facts show that the country needs to do a whole lot better to compete. Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, is not among the continent’s top 20 preferred destinations in World Bank’s 2020 report on the Ease of Doing Business.

Kenya, which is Number 4 on the list, has one of the most chaotic and unforgiving journalism practices on the continent. Much the same can be said for South Africa, which is ranked sixth, and Ghana, our nemesis, which is ranked 17th.

It may be hard for Mohammed to swallow, but to aid digestion, I would like to remind him of one of the great press statements he wrote in his collection, Witness to history, entitled, “Obama’s planned visit to Ghana wake-up call for Nigeria”.

In one of the most controversial US presidential visits to West Africa, former President Barack Obama, had snubbed Nigeria and, instead, decided to visit Ghana. In a press statement issued on May 24, 2009, Mohammed, then the National Publicity Secretary of the opposition Action Congress, admonished President Yar’Adua’s Government to regard Obama’s snub as a “wake-up call”.

“The message should be clear to our leaders,” Mohammed said, “that it is not your population, the size of your territory, your endowment in mineral resources or your claim to being a giant that the world is interested in. It is good governance, purposeful leadership arising from free and fair elections, zero-tolerance for corruption and the continuous strengthening of democracy.”

The point couldn’t be more eloquently made. In deciding to set up in Ghana and not in Nigeria. Twitter culled Mohammed’s own speech from his former life. If he would only patiently read it again, he might just see that the snakes and con artists he so desperately wants to destroy are also occasional martyrs of journalism.

And in case Mohammed was not looking, only on Tuesday, April 20, Amazon announced plans to set up a R4billlion ($279.8m) headquarters in Cape Town, South Africa, an investment which, according to Businesstech, will create 5,239 direct and 19,000 indirect jobs.

This is more than Buhari’s Government’s microphone chewing has created in years.

The real problem, Mr. Minister, is the man in the mirror.


Ishiekwene is the Editor-In-Chief of THE INTERVIEW

Again, Fear Over Buhari’s Health, Presidency Debunks Rumour

0
President Muhammadu Buhari

By Tosin Olatokunbo

The Nigerian Presidency has refuted suggestions that President Muhammdu Buhari is still sick, more than a week after he returned from a medical trip to London. Buhari traveled out of the country on March 30, spent two weeks on a routine medical checkup in the Bori Johnson-led nation and has since returned to Aso Rock Villa, Nigeria’s seat of power.

But Femi Adesina, Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, said since President Buhari returned to the country many people have been calling him to know whether the nation’s number one citizen is alright. The presidency has refused to disclose the exact ailment Buhari is suffering from, even when his medical trip abroad has affected much of his presidency.

The presidential spokesman however said on his Facebook page there is no cause for alarm on Buhari’s health, noting that those wishing the president dead will not succeed. He debunked suggestion that the president is sick, adding “so from where did the pernicious rumour start on Sunday? From evil hearted people, who never love to see or hear any form of good. They are people who spend their days expecting the storm, and so they never enjoy the rainfall.

“From day one in office, they have hounded and hectored the President, but God simply laughs them to scorn. Who is man that says anything that it comes to pass, when God has not said so?” Adesina said.

Femi Adesina
Adesina Debunks Buhari’s Sick Rumour

The Nigerian leader has traveled, six times to London on medical trips since assuming power six years ago after he succeeded President Goodluck Jonathan

On June 6, 2016, Buhari left Nigeria for his first medical vacation. The president was away on a 10-day medical trip to London to treat an ear infection. He extended his trip by 3 days to rest. He returned from that journey on June 19, 2016.

On January 19, 2017, the president traveled to the United Kingdom on medical leave and returned on March 10 after spending 51 days out of the country. Also on May 8, 2017, Buhari travelled to the United Kingdom for medical attention and remained there till August 19, 2017, spending 104 days.

On September 21, 2017, he traveled from the US to the UK for medical purposes and returned to Abuja on September 25, 2017.

Four days after returning to Nigeria from the United States where he met with Former President Donald Trump, Buhari returned to the UK for medical reasons on May 8, 2018. He returned to Nigeria on May 11.

Meanwhile, analysts insist that Buhari was prevented from traveling out of the country, last year, due to the global corona virus pandemic.

IPOB :Kanu Rejects Buhari’s Bribe To Abandon Struggle

0

By Tosin Olatokunbo

The Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB has rejected financial inducement from the federal government to abandon the struggle for the secession of the south east from Nigeria, the Nnamdi Kanu-led group has said. IPOB spoke on the crest of allegation by Garba Shehu, Senior Special Assistant to President Muhammadu Buhari on Media and Publicity, that some prominent Nigerians are demanding bribes from the government to prevail on secessionist groups across the country to stop their struggle.

Apart from IPOB, other secessionist groups have emerged since Buhari came to power in 2015, including the south west where Sunday Igboho, a Yoruba activist and other people from the zone are demanding secession from Nigeria.

Garba had said “You can’t intimidate Buhari; you can’t bully him. A lot of these people who are calling for secession are the problem of this country. I am happy that reasonable voices are now rising. Is it not only yesterday we read about Afenifere — the most credible faction of Afenifere — saying ‘we’re not for secession’? Ohanaeze Ndigbo said this over and over again.

“So, this thing about secession is they had used it in the past. You create secession and break up Nigeria and then you intimidate the sitting leader and then he opens the vault and he brings money to settle people.

“President Buhari will pay no one. He is not going to pay, and now it is clear that having ignored all of that, reasonable opinions are coming from those states and from those regions.”

IPOB spokesman, Emma Powerful, however said in a statement on Thursday, that President has been doing everything to bribe Kanu, with a huge sum to drop the Biafra struggle.

Media and Publicity Secretary of the secessionist group, Emma Powerful, disclosed this in a statement sent to our correspondent in Awka, Anambra State.

Powerful said it is preposterous for the government to claim that the resurgence of secessionist groups in the country was because the Buhari administration refused to dole out cash to sponsors and leaders of those calling for self determination.

The Knau-led group said “Federal Government has on several occasions but without success, attempted to buy over our leader Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, making him some irresistible offers.We wish to remind the Fulani Presidency that only a certified and unconscionable moron will ever equate money to the motive behind the growing agitation for self-determination across Nigeria.

“If money is what we want, we know what to do to get more money. How many times in the past did our leader reject your financial inducements? As a people, Biafrans are enterprising and we don’t think we are behind any region in terms of affluence and economic security despite the oppressive policies of this 97 per cent versus five per cent government targeted against our hardworking illustrious sons and daughters and the monopolistic tendencies of the Fulani Janjaweed.

“We are tired of being ruled by government officials who dine and wine with terrorists but brutalise and kill law abiding freedom fighters. We are tired of being ruled by a government that pays ransom to bandits, frees terrorists but jails unarmed protesters. IPOB is not, has never been, and will never be interested in the crumbs from Federal Government of Nigeria,” IPOB said.

Meanwhile, the Buhari administration has thrown its weight behind embattled Minister of Communictions and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami against public demand that the minister resign from his position, over his past comments supporting Taliban and Alqaeda. The federal government said the minister has apologized for his extremist views, he should therefore, go and sin no more.

Lancelot Imaseun Premieres ‘Wede’, Highlights Golden Jubilee Celebration |The Source

0
Lancelot Imaseun

By Akinwale Kasali

As part of the activities lined up for the 50th birthday celebration of Africa’s most consistent filmmaker, Amb Lancelot Oduwa Imaseun’s Multiple award winning movie, Wede, an adaptation of Prof Julie Okoh’s Edewede will be  premiered in Uromi, Esan South East Local Government Area of Edo state.

Speaking on the choice of location for the premiere,  Imasuen said; “It’s part of his drive to spread quality entertainment to all nooks and crannies of Edo state. No place must be left behind.”

The celebrated culture ambassador also stated that, “The writer of the book is an Esan, from Ubiza and the movie’s setting is Esan’s background, So as such, they must see it first.

“Another important thing is that the issue the movie is treating touches on the obnoxious issue of female genital mutilation which is still being practiced in most remote villages. So, it’s timely and very important that the great leaders and people of Esanland should first see this blockbuster movie and give their blessings.”

Starring great and talented Nollywood’s bests in Oge Okoye, Rita Edochie, Nosa Obaseki, Francis Onwonchi, Isio Joseph, and many more Wede is a feature length film that tells the story about female genital mutilation. The story was set in the 80’s

It would be recalled that Wede won for Lancelot  Imasuen the Best Director Award at the just concluded Coal City Film Festival held in Enugu, Nigeria.

Buhari:: I Stand By Patanmi; Blames Opposition; Investigates Alleged Media Inducement |The Source

0
Muhammadu Buhari

By Charles Igbo

Those Nigerians asking President Muhammadu Buhari to sack the Minister  for Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami, are wasting  their time. They have another thinking to do. Nor would  Minister Pantami honorably resign on his own.

President Buhari has told them that his Minister is going nowhere. And that he stands by him,  and is watching his back.

The President had come under immense pressure to fire this Minister whose past record, recently unearthed and published, show he had sympathy for terrorists, especially, Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Evidences, also, abound of his abhorrence of Christians. He had strong radical views, and and delivered inciting preaching in Mosques aimed against Christians.

In his defence, Pantami  said he no longer believes in his earlier beliefs, and had become a changed man. But outraged Nigerians had said leaving Pantami as a Cabinet member, especially, in charge of  a sensitive Ministry spelt doom. They are not only asking for his sack, they are asking that he be investigated by Security agents.

But none of those would happen. Pantami is standing strong like the Rock of Gibraltar. The Presidency is blaming the opposition, saying Pantami’s ordeal stems from his good works in the past two years. He is working for the masses, the Presidency said, and that the opposition was not happy with it.

In a statement signed by the Senior Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Garba Shehu, on Monday, April 22, the Presidency said the Minister was being persecuted for nothing. While the statement said the Presidency was not in support of Pantami earlier stand, it agreed with him that he was young and immature at the time he held such extreme views.

It said the pressure to sack the Minister is coming from those who want to distract Minister Pantami  from the good job he is doing, and submitted that the Federal Government would investigate the allegation that some  Editors turned down the money offered to them to publish materials to rubbish the Minister.

Isa Pantami
Isa Pantami

The statement reads: “Today, there is an unfortunate fashion in public  discourse that makes leaders in politics, religion and civil society liable for every statement they have ever made in the past – no matter how long ago, and even after they have later rejected them.

“This insidious phenomenon seeks to cancel the careers of others on the basis of a thing they have said, regardless of when they said it.

“The Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Dr Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami, is currently, subject to a “cancel campaign” instigated by those who seek his removal. They do not really care what he may, or may not have said 20 years ago: that is merely the instrument they are using to attempt to “cancel” him. But they will profit should he be stopped from making decisions that improves  the lives of everyday Nigerians.

“The Minister has rightly apologised for what he said in the early 2000s. The views were absolutely unacceptable then, and would be equally unacceptable today, were he to repeat them. But he will not repeat them – for he has publicly and permanently condemned his earlier utterances as wrong.

“In the 2000s, the Minister was a man in his twenties, next year, he will be 50. Time has passed, and people and their opinions –  often rightly- change.

“But all discerning Nigerians  know this manufactured dispute is nothing to do with the Minister’s prior words,  but solely concern his actions in the present.

“This administration is committed to improving the lives of Nigerians – and that includes ensuring that they are not over-charged or over-protected for those services on which modern life depends.

“The Minister has been leading the charge against illegal data deductions and pricing; he has revolutionized the Government’s virtual public engagement to respond to COVID-19 snd save tax-payers money; he has established ICT Start-up Centres to boost youth entrepreneurship and create jobs; he has changed policy to ensure locally ICT content  is used by Ministries starting with his own; and he has deregistered some 9.2million SIMS – ending the ability of criminals and terrorists to flagrantly use mobile networks undetected. In two short years, Minister Pantami has driven the contribution of the ICT sector to the GDP to more than 18 per cent, making it one of the top two playing a critical role in the emergence of the economy from the COVID-19- induced recession.

“In putting people first, the Minister and this administration have made enemies. There are those in the opposition who see success and want it halted by all means. And there is now well-reported information that Alleges newspaper editors rebuffed an attempt to financially induce them to run a smear campaign against the Minister by some ICT companies, many of which do indeed stand to lose financially through lower prices and greater consumer protections. The Government is now investigating the veracity behind these claims of attempted indictment and – should they be found to hold credence – police and judicial action must be expected.

“The Administration stands behind Minister Pantami and all Nigerian citizens to ensure they receive fair treatment, fair prices, and fair protection in ICT services.”

Many Nigerians, including Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, had foreseen that the Federal Government would protect the Minister instead of giving him a shove over his extreme religious views, and earlier connections with terrorist groups.

Babangida: Wike Slams Weak PDP National Leadership |The Source

0
Nyesom Wike

By Gideon Njoku

Governor Nyesom Wike of Rivers State has chided the Leadership of his Party, People’s Democratic Party, PDP, for not taking a disciplinary action, against the ex-Governor of Niger State, Mu’azu Babangida Aliyu, for publicly saying that he worked against the PDP in 2015.

Aliyu, PDP, a few days ago, said he, and other PDP Northern Governors, worked against the success of the Party’s Presidential candidate, Dr Goodluck Jonathan, in favour of the Presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress, APC, Major General Muhammadu Buhari.

At the time, Jonathan was the incumbent President, while the now President Buhari was the candidate of the APC.

Buhari defeated Jonathan during that election, and is doing his second term in office as President.

In an unnecessary revelation a few days ago, Aliyu disclosed that the Northern PDP Governors at the time, worked against Jonathan’s victory, because the former President breached an alleged agreement he had with them not to be a contestant in the 2015 Presidential Election, having completed late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s tenure on Yar’Adua’s death. He contested and won in 2011.

Aliyu said  a Jonathan victory in 2015 would have been detrimental to the North. Meaning that the PDP Northern Governors collected money for the Presidential campaign, and either pocketed the money, or used it to work for Buhari.

For long, speculations had been rife over the role played by Northern PDP Governors as well as the Leadership of the PDP at the  National Level, as represented by the former Governor of Bauchi State, Adamu Muazu. Jonathan lost in all the Northern states considered PDP stronghold.

Babangida Aliyu
Babangida Aliyu

 

So, Ex- Governor Aliyu has just confirmed that speculation.

But Senator Jonah Jang, Governor of Plateau State at the time, has denied Aliyu’s claims, insisting that he never worked against Jonathan. He vehemently denied that. Remarkably, though, the PDP, also, lost Plateau  State for the first time in 2015.

In his reaction, Jonathan dismissed Aliyu as a blatant liar who had since lost every political relevance, and was looking for relevance. He challenged Aliyu to bring evidence of any such agreement, and say where and when such an agreement was reached.

On Tuesday, April 21, an angry Wike joined the fray in an interview with the AIT, slamming the PDP Leadership for condoning such sabotage against the Party as exhibited and revealed by Aliyu, without invoking a disciplinary action against him.

He said what Aliyu did was not only unconscionable, but going public with his treachery was the limit.

He said that if he was in the shoes of the National Working Committee of the Party, NWC, he would since have disciplined former Governor Aliyu.

Wike: “If I was the leadership of the party,  I would have suspended Aliyu for that comment he made. But, you see nothing will happen. The National Working Committee will not do anything. Why? They need Aliyu to support them.

“I cannot understand why you are a leader, so to speak, you come out and tell the world why you fought your party.

“I have never seen a thing like this in my life. Assuming you did it, you now want to rub it on them that nothing will happen.

“If I was the leadership of the party, I would have suspended Aliyu and heavens will not fall. What does he want to achieve?

“This was 2015. We have done 2019 election. Jonathan had lost in 2015, why do you come out now to say how you fought him?

“Look at where we are today. So, you are telling us you made us to be in this position where we are.

“You are telling Nigerians that you are one of those who have kept Nigeria in this state that we are. And then the National Working Committee will not do anything because Aliyu Babangida is one of the untouchables.”

In same manner, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, Jonathan’s Media and Publicity Campaign Director, in a tweet, asked all the other Nothern PDP members who sabotaged Jonathan to come clean just as ex-Governor Aliyu did.

Fani-Kayode, specifically, mentioned former National Chairman, Adamu Muazu, former National Security Adviser to Jonathan, Rtd Col   Sambo Dasuki, and former Principal Secretary to President Jonathan, Hassan Tukur, and challenged him to come clean.

Unconfirmed reports reportedly, say Tukur was the one who recommended the immediate past INEC Chairman, Professor Attahiru Jega,  to Jonathan. The then President appointed Jega without knowing him.

Popular Nollywood Actor, Arrested For Allegedly Raping Minor |The Source

0

By Akinwale Kasali

The news came as a rude shock to fans of 48-year old man, Olarenwaju James, popularly known as Baba Ijesha. He is under arrest  for, allegedly, raping a minor –  14-year old girl.

Baba Ijesha was arrested and detained by Men of the Lagos State Police Command over the allegation.

Confirming his arrest, the Lagos Police spokesman, CSP Olumuyiwa Adejobi, said the case of defilement was reported on 19th April, 2021, by a lady, Princess Adekola Adekanya, at Sabo Police Station and transferred to the Gender Unit of the State CID, Panti, Yaba Lagos for proper investigation.

Based on preliminary findings, it was alleged that the suspect (Baba Ijesha) started sexually assaulting the victim, who is now 14 years, since she was 7 years old.

The suspect was said to have confessed to the crime and was also captured by a CCTV camera in the house of the complainant.

The Lagos State Commissioner of Police, CP Hakeem Odumosu, has ordered for proper investigation as he promised to do justice to the matter.

Why Buhari Will Not Sack Patami – Wike; Says Power- play Sacked Magu |The Source

0
Nyesom Wike

By Gideon Njoku

Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, says President Muhammadu Buhari is not likely to sack the embattled Minister for Communications and Digital  Economy, Isa Pantami from his Cabinet.

The Minister has been under attack over the damning expose of him as a jihadist and a sympathiser and supporter of terrorism. He had unbelievable sympathy for both the Al Qaeda Leadership as represented by the late Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban Leadership. He praised them each time they successfully carried out terrorist activities, and  commended Bin Laden for being a better Muslim than him, Pantami, for successfully killing thousands of people in the World Trade Centre horror, in the US.

Back in Nigeria, his preaching in Mosques were fiery and inciting and had encouraged religious clashes.

He did not deny, but put under pressure, the Minister says he is matured now, and that his understanding  of religions has changed since then.

But many Nigerians are of the opinion that Pantami is not remorseful and he remains the same. A leopard does not change its spots, they argue. They have, therefore, put him under pressure to resign, failing which they are asking the President to sack him.

Since the Pantami scandal,  President Buhari has said nothing, nor has the Federal Government addressed it.

At the end of the  Federal Executive Council meeting on Wednesday, April 21, Minister for Information, Lai Mohammed,  told State House Correspondents that the Pantami issue was not discussed.

But weighing in, Governor Wike is wondering what Pantami is still doing in Buhari’s cabinet. He calls it an aberration, emphasising that in saner climes, the Minister would have since resigned, or sacked.

Isa Pantami
Minister for Communications and Digital  Economy, Isa Pantami

Speaking in an interview with the African Independent Television, AIT, Wike said he knew that Buhari would not sack him because he does not listen adhere security reports.

Exonerating, indirectly, the Security organs that screened Patami, Wike was quoted by his Media Adviser, Kelvin Ebri, as reminding the AIT about the case of the now-sacked Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, Ibrahim Magu.

Two times, the then leadership of the Directorate of State Services, DSS, wrote damning reports against Magu’s confirmation by the Senate. The Senate did not. But that did not stop Buhari from keeping Magu in office for five years, in an Acting capacity.

The Governor said that Magu was eventually sacked because of power-play, nothing more.

He accused the APC-led Government, of shielding people with questionable character in its fold, saying that is why Pantami is safe.

Wike: “I don’t understand why a reasonable Government will allow such a person (Pantami) to be in the cabinet,

“But you were here when DSS wrote a report against (Ibrahim) Magu. What happened? Look, I have never seen a country that your secret service wrote a report about the nominee of Mr President, questioning his character and the rest, and that he is not appointable. What happened? So, what are you talking about. What removed Magu is a power play.”

In the midst of the damning revelations against Pantami, no Northern Governor, or Leader, has condemned him, asked for his resignation from office, or his sack by President Buhari.

OPINION: Pantami as a metaphor |The Source

0
Ikechukwu Amaechi
Ikechukwu Amaechi 

By Ikechukwu Amaechi

Nigerians are aghast, or so it seems, that Ali Isa Pantami, the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, is, indeed, the jihadist in situ.

There is no gain in sugar-coating it. He is the Islamic militant within, well positioned in the corridors of power to deliver for his constituents – radical Islamists. And he has used his being “in place” to deliver handsomely.

Every well-meaning citizen of this country – Muslim, Christian, Northerner and Southerner – should be alarmed that a man who harboured such extremist views, even if it was in the past, made his way to such a high office.

Many questions remain unanswered. How did we get here? Who knew what?

In May 2020, a bitter conflict erupted between the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NIDCOM), Abike Dabiri-Erewa, and Pantami. As the feud got messier on Twitter, Dabiri-Erewa – who had accused Pantami of ordering gunmen to throw NIDCOM staff out of the office given to them by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) – made a quirky revelation.

Pantami denied her allegation and called her a liar. “This is a fat lie from her,” he tweeted all caps on May 24, 2020. In the evening of same day, Dabiri-Erewa punched back also calling him a liar.

Isa Pantami
Ali Isa Pantami

But what raised eyebrows was not the fact of her fighting back but the telling insinuation. “An Islamic scholar should not lie Hon. Minister (PhD). You did that to me cos I am a woman. Your disrespect for women is legendary,” she wrote.

Why would a minister deny an agency of government an office space because the agency is headed by a woman? And why would Dabiri-Erewa consider such allegation an effective punch back in the circumstance?

In the last couple of weeks since Pantami became the issue in Nigeria’s never-ending debacle, one question has concentrated my mind. Was Dabiri-Erewa giving Nigerians a hint? Maybe! But Nigerians, not being prescient enough, failed to take the hint.

Things have since changed dramatically.

If Pantami has been a closet jihadist all along, the lid has been blown wide open with reports alleging that he was enamoured of terrorists and is now on the radar of America’s intelligence community.

His initial reaction was to bluster. But the more he blustered, the more his past was unearthed and brought to the public space. And they are damning.

In the mid-2000s, Pantami was the ideologue of extremist Islamic groups like Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. His preachments were fiery and most times resulted in violence. His fellow feeling for domestic and international terrorists, wholesale endorsement of terrorism and intolerance of non-Muslims, would make Osama bin Laden green with envy.

Pantami was heard on video saying, “We are all happy whenever unbelievers are being killed, but the Sharia does not allow us to kill them without a reason.”

He said bin Laden’s penchant for killing unbelievers makes him a better Muslim than himself.

When President Goodluck Jonathan moved forcefully against Boko Haram terrorists, Pantami said it was genocide against Muslims.

“See what our fellow Muslim brothers’ blood has turned to? Even pig blood has more value than that of a fellow Muslim brother …. You caught someone sleeping and you killed him. If it is not Muslims that undergo such treatments who else?” Pantami lamented.

In the wake of the religious crisis that engulfed Yelwa Shendam, Plateau State in 2004, Pantami volunteered to lead a jihad against Christians and admonished Muslims to shun politicians and religious clerics who preached peace and restraint. “This jihad is an obligation for every single believer, especially in Nigeria,” he exhorted his followers.

When Abū Muṣ‘ab al-Zarqāwī, the leader of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, was killed in 2006, Pantami offered his public condolences.

His words: “May God have mercy on Aḥmad alFāḍil al-Khalayleh, raḥmatullāh’ alayhi. May God forgive his mistakes. He is a human being. He has certainly some mistakes in front of God, so may God forgive his mistakes. Who am I talking about? He is Abū Muṣ‘ab al-Zarqāwī.”

Commenting on the religious crisis in Bauchi in 2009, U.S. diplomats in Nigeria recorded in an April 15, 2009 diplomatic cable (exposed by WikiLeaks in 2011) that “Imam Pantami Isa, who preached at the Mosque, had been previously thrown out of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University and of a Gombe Mosque for preaching inflammatory rhetoric.”

This is the man President Muhammadu Buhari appointed Minister of Communications and Digital Economy at the inception of his second term after he had served as Director-General and Chief Executive Officer of the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) from 2016 to 2019.

In both capacities, Pantami presided, and still presides over Nigeria’s telecom databases and sensitive national identity and critical biometric data infrastructure. He is in-charge of the mandatory National Identification Number (NIN) programme. A man that harbours affectionate sentiment for terrorist causes is the custodian of the biometric data of every single Nigerian. If this is not scary, then nothing else is.

In this era of social media, the evidence against Pantami is so overwhelming that he has climbed down from his blustering high horse. But without apologising, he has rationalised his extremism by claiming that some of those comments were based on his understanding of religious issues at the time they were made.

“Some of the comments I made some years ago that are generating controversies now were based on my understanding of religious issues at the time, and I have changed several positions taken in the past based on new evidence and maturity,” he reportedly said while responding to questions during his daily Ramadan lecture at Anoor Mosque in Abuja on Saturday.

“I was young when I made some of the comments; I was in university, some of the comments were made when I was a teenager. I started preaching when I was 13, many scholars and individuals did not understand some of international events and therefore took some positions based on their understanding, some have come to change their positions later.”

Of course, his reasons for extremist escapades are preposterous. He was not the only Islamic cleric of the era he was talking about. So, why didn’t others become radicalised or become agents of global jihadist groups?It is also a “fat lie” for Pantami to claim age as an alibi for his religious zealotry.

He was not a teenager when, as the Chief Imam of the Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University (ATBU) Bauchi Mosque, his incendiary preachments resulted in the brutal murder of Sunday Nache Achi, a 400-level student, who was leader of the ECWA Student Ministries (ESM) on the campus on December 9, 2004.

Achi’s crime? Distributing a Christian tract which Pantami said blasphemed Islam and Prophet Mohammed.

In an exclusive interview with TheNiche this week, Nache’s father, Prof. Samuel Achi – CEO of the Federal College of Chemical and Leather Technology at the time his son was strangled in the Mosque where Pantami held sway as an Islamic avatar – said there was absolutely nothing in the tract that should attract a fatwa.

 

Pantami’s claim of having disclaimed Boko Haram is hollow. Of course the Boko Haram of 10 years ago is still the Boko Haram of today. Why would he support the group yesterday and repudiate it today? The only logical explanation is that he is now in government.

So, what happens when Buhari leaves office? Will Pantami once again remember that “pig blood has more value than that of a fellow Muslim brother?”

Some Nigerians have called on him to resign or for Buhari to fire him. That is what happens in a sane country. But Nigeria under Buhari’s watch has gone too gaga and I dare say none of the two will happen.

Pantami will neither resign nor be sacked by Buhari.

Why would Buhari sack him for the very tendencies that earned him a place of honour on the presidential dinner table? Will Buhari claim that he didn’t know about his extremist escapades before appointing him minister?

What should worry Nigerians most is the fact that Pantami went through both security and legislative screening and was given a pass to become a minister.

Didn’t the Department of State Services (DSS) unearth his entanglements with extreme religious ideologies? Or they found out but thought he was indeed a changed man and, therefore, it didn’t matter again? What did the Senate know?

Pantami is a metaphor for what Nigeria has become under Buhari’s watch. The Pantami metaphor explains why terrorists hold sway in all the nooks and crannies of the country today – kindred spirits are not only in government but also in power.


Amaechi is the Publisher/Editor-in-Chief of TheNiche

Buhari Is Enemy To Nigeria’s Unity – Adebanjo; How To Silence Kanu, Igboho |The Source

0

By Akinwale Kasali

Leader of the Pan Yoruba Group, Afenifere, Chief Ayo Adebanjo has labelled President Muhammadu Buhari the number one enemy of Nigeria’s Unity.

Adebanjo stated this on ‘The Morning Show,’ a breakfast programme on Channels Television.

He said President Buhari has given wings to the sail of separatist agitators in the country by ignoring the calls of patriotic Nigerians for a new constitution.

Adebanjo stressed that the 1999 Constitution (as amended) was imposed on Nigerians by the military and must be changed.

He blamed the Constitution for creating the conditions for marginalisation and injustice against some parts of the country.

He said only a new Constitution before the 2023 General Election can silence agitators like Nnamdi Kanu and Sunday Igboho.

Adebanjo: “Since President Buhari has refused to listen to the masses concerning the call for a change in our Constitution, which has led to the continued agitations from different parts of the county, thus creating disunity among Nigerians who are calling for secession, then it becomes obvious that President Buhari is the number one enemy to the unity of Nigeria.”

Adebanjo accused Buhari of having a hidden agenda by refusing to restructure Nigeria.

He said the youths were too impatient, and could not bear the sufferings inflicted on them by the present constitution.

“If Buhari is patriotic enough, a new constitution and restructuring will silence Nnamdi Kanu of IPOB and Yoruba activist, Sunday Igboho, and all others with their secessionist agenda.

“If you don’t, you will continue to give impetus to them. You are encouraging secession. You want to suppress them. We are the people who want restructuring. Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

“This constitution was imposed on Nigerians in 1966 by the military, and it is the reason for the crisis we have today.

“We must restructure Nigeria and bring it back to true federalism which our founding fathers fought for.

“The refusal of President Buhari and the members of APC to change the constitution is a clear indication that President Buhari and the APC government are the number one enemy of Nigeria’s unity if they continue to refuse the call for the restructuring of Nigeria back to true federalism,” Adebanjo added.