Home Blog Page 2441

Access Bank’s Quest As World’s Most Respected African Bank

0

The Group Managing Director/ chief executive officer of Access Bank Plc Herbert Wigwe has disclosed that expanding out of its comfort zone in Nigeria, as the biggest bank by assets has become necessary as the Deposit Money Bank, DMB inches toward becoming World’s Most Respected African Bank.

Wigwe, according to a statement by the bank was reacting to the completion of the paperwork with the former owners of Mozambique’s African Banking Corporation, a Southern African Bank, which effectively brought the bank under Access Bank Plc full control.

“We are pleased with the completion of this acquisition which significantly strengthens our banking franchise in Mozambique and represents a transformational step in our growth plans in the country and the broader Southern Africa region, we are building the scale necessary to compete effectively and efficiently in key African markets outside Nigeria and ensure we sustainably deliver a strong return on invested capital in our Africa expansion.

Herbert Wigwe - Access Bank MD arrested by EFCC
Wigwe: Targets Key African Markets 

“Scale is an important contributor to returns, and this transaction is consistent with our rigorous efforts to create a strong presence with scale across Africa, and in line with our vision to be World’s Most Respected African Bank.”

The chief executive of the deposit money bank, DMB cannot be more right, sector analysts say, considering that the bank has moved out from its comfort zone as the largest bank in Nigeria by asset, to acquiring more banks across the continent, particularly in Southern Africa where the lender has effectively taken over three banks within eight months.

The strategic plan, the bank said is “to create the seventh largest bank in the Mozambican banking market.”

Apart from the Mozambique bank, Grobank Limited, a South African   and Zambia-based Cavmont Bank are already under the full control of the ‘biggest Nigerian Bank by Assets’.

A source had earlier informed the magazine that the Wigwe-led bank is targeting acquisitions/ take-over in eight other markets in Egypt, Ivory Coast, Senegal, Morocco Angola, Namibia, Algeria and Ethiopia, with the strategic plan “to bring Access Bank to 20 countries within a few  years.”

How Okorocha Rebuffed Me Uzodinma; Says Former Governor Suffering Post Power Syndrome |The Source

0
Hope Uzodimma with APC Panel

imo State Governor, Senator Hope Uzodinma says former Governor Rochas Okorocha is suffering from a post-power syndrome.

The Governor also confirmed that neither Okorocha nor former Senator Ifeanyi Ararume registered nor revalidated their membership of the All Progressives Congress, APC, during the Party’s recent exercise to update its membership register.

Uzodinma revealed that contrary to the allegations by both men that he, the Governor, instructed that they be not registered,  Okorocha rebuffed his offer to accompany him to his (Okorocha’s) Ward so as to get registered.

Uzodimma said his desires remains to have every genuine All Progressive Congress member in the state registered. But he  identified post-power-syndrome as the problem of most political leaders in Nigeria today.

Governor Uzodimma who spoke at the Sam Mbakwe Exco Chambers Government House Owerri, Thursday, while receiving APC Registration and Revalidation Appeal Committee noted that “the management of self aggrandizement, self esteem, and inability to reason that yesterday is gone and today is a new vista is the major problem of most past leaders who still think they can carry over the powers they held yesterday.”

Addressing the Committee whose members hinted that former Governor of Imo State, Rochas Okorocha and Senator Ifeanyi Araraume complained that they and their supporters were bared from the recent registration and revalidation exercise, Governor Uzodimma informed that those who are complaining about the APC registration in the State are those who never drew near to get registered.

The governor pointed out that he never as a person delegated anybody to intervene or obstruct anyone from registration.

The Governor did not mince words to say that the monitoring Committee assigned to the National Registration Team was mandated to make sure that all members and even non-members of APC were registered in the exercise.

He restated his resolve to “uphold the APC manifesto to change things for the better for Imo people in particular and Nigeria in general,” saying in doing so he is “returning the power of APC to the people following the democratic process.”

Governor Uzodimma told the team led by Hon. Farouk Adamu Aliyu that his interest is the growth of the party in Imo State and beyond and not necessarily the interest of an individual or groups.

Governor Uzodimma said he personally offered to accompany Senator Okorocha to his ward for the former governor to get registered or revalidate his APC membership but he threw away the offer and preferred to talk about structure.

He regretted that some people find it difficult to manage life after power, noting that nothing will deter him from registering as many Imo people as would want to identify with the APC.

Governor Uzodimma pointed out that soon the Party Congresses will be held in the State for people to choose who they want to preside over their affairs and that “if nothing different is done it will be a Direct Congress because as the Governor of Imo State I was a beneficiary of the process.

Briefing the Governor on why they came to see him, the leader of the APC Registration and Revalidation Appeal Committee, Hon. Farouk Adamu Aliyu explained that they have come to critically look at the complaints and petitions of members who claimed that they were not captured, and or were prevented from registering during the Party’s National Registration exercise.

Looters List: Secondus floors FG, Lai Mohammed; As Court Directs Them To Apologize, Pay N20m |The Source

0
Uche Secondus

For publishing his name among the list of alleged Looters in Newspapers, National Chairman of the People’s Democratic Party, Prince Uche Secondus has been awarded the sum of N20m.

The award is against the Federal Government and the Minister for Information and National Orientation, Lai Mohammed.

Secondus, in addition, got awarded a public apology to be tendered by the two.

A Rivers State High Court on Thursday found the FG and Mohammad guilty of defamation against Secondus.

The Court, presided over by the State Chief Judge, Hon. Justice A. I. Iyayi-Lamikanra, said that the Claimant’s case succeeds and the Defendants are jointly and severally liable for the libelous publication made against the Claimant.

The Court further directed the Federal Government and Alhaji Mohammad to publish a written apology in favour of Prince Secondus in the newspaper of the 3rd Defendant.

An Order of injunction restraining the Defendants whether by themselves, agents or privies from further publishing defamatory statements against the Claimant.

That the Defendants shall pay the sum of 20 Million Naira to the Claimant as damages.

Recall that the Minister of Information had in March, 2018, published a list of some Nigerians he claimed looted the country and included Prince Secondus as one of them.

In reaction Prince Secondus filed a case in court PHC/1013/2018 claiming that Mr Mohammad’s publication was defamatory and he asked the court to direct him to retract the said publication and apologize in writing.

Prince Secondus had earlier, through his lawyer, Emeka Etiaba, SAN, written to the Minister seeking immediate retraction of his name and payment of N1.5b damages within 72 hours, failure of which the Claimant, by a writ of summons filed a suit on the 6th of April 2018 for the following claims:

A declaration that the publication made by the Defendant’s against the Claimant (the subject matter of this suit is defamatory)

An order of this Honourable Court directing the Defendant’s to retract the said publication and apologize in writting to the Claimant for the Defamatory publication.

.An order of this Honourable Court directing the Defendant’s to publish the retraction and the written apology in all the News and Social Media  including but not limited to The Nations Newspaper ,This Day Newspaper ,Sun Newspaper, Guardian Newspaper ,Punch Newspaper, Nigerian Television Authority ,Channels Television amongst others where the defamatory materials were published.

An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant’s their Agents and privies from further publishing the Defamatory publication against the Claimant.

Damages for the sum of N1,500,000,000.00( one Billion ,Five Hundred Million Naira ) only by the Defendant’s to the Claimant being general damages for humiliation , castigation , verification,attack of his person and integrity by the defamatory publication.

Cost of the suit.

7.And for such further or order or other orders as this Honourable Court may seem fit to make in the circumstances of this case.

Messers Echezona C. Etiaba, SAN, N. J. Asoh, Esq., E. S. Aluzu, Esq., R. C. Keneboh, Esq. and F. E. Obiosio, Esq. appeared for Prince Secondus while D.L. Inko-Tariah, Esq. appeared the Federal Government and Mohammad from the office of the Attorney General of the Federation and Chinedu Udemba, Esq.

Holding the brief of Victor C. Nwaugo, Esq. appeared for the 3rd defendant.

How AGF Malami Evokes Ethnicity And Divisiveness – Abaribe |The Source

0

By Adesina Soyooye

The Senate Minority Leader, Enyinnaya Abaribe, has accused the Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN, of  questioning the oneness of Nigeria.

Abaribe, also, accused Malami of fanning the embers of ethnicity and divisiveness.

In  a statement signed on his behalf by his Media Adviser, Uchenna Awom, Abaribe said Malami’s disposition towards the banning of open grazing by Southern Governors was frightening.

The Senator was responding  to Malami’s assertion that the ban placed on open grazing by Southern Governors when they met in Asaba, Delta State, last week, was illegal.

Malami went on to compare open grazing to the selling of spare parts.

Apparently referring to the Igbo who have a reputation for dealing in Spare parts, Malami said banning open grazing in the South was like banning the sale of Spare parts in the North.

The Attorney General’s position has attracted strong condemnations from different quarters. Tackling him, Ondo State Governor, Rotimi Akeredolu, SAN, said that the ban on open grazing in the South would be vigorously implemented in the South, to the letter

In a strongly worded response, Abaribe interrogated Malami’s statement, asking: What’s the correlation between spare parts dealers in a rented shop or designated area and marauding herders  destroying farms, killing and raping…?”

 

Part of Senator Abaribe’s statement reads:

“While the local Bureau de Change” business mostly done by the Fulanis are operating in all parts of Nigeria, why have they not elicited any resentment of other Nigerians?

“It is simply because they live and do their business peacefully without any problem. It is the murderous activities of Fulani herders that have given rise to the current demand for laws that will bring about peaceful coexistence of all Nigerians.

“What’s the correlation between spare parts sellers in a rented shop or government properly designated area and marauding Fulani herders destroying farms, killing and raping thus trampling on people’s private properties and means of livelihood? Such a divisive statement from a top federal government official, infact the Chief legal adviser to the federal government at that, exposes a very dangerous mindset . This disposition has no doubt raised the tension in Nigeria to a frightening level.

“Why should an Attorney general of the federation be so fixated in evoking ethnic/regional fault lines when duty calls for him to be a statesman. It is disheartening that Mr Abubakar Malami has chosen to debase our country. He has indeed questioned Nigeria’s unity. Very unfortunate.”

Abaribe, from Abia State, was the Deputy Governor of Abia State during the Administration of Orji Uzor Kalu, now a Senator.

OPINION: The Attorney-General Is Wrong On Open Grazing |The Source

0

By Aloy Ejimakor

“Open grazing intimidates, insults and annoys. And in this era, it terrorizes, kills and destroys properties.What more do you need before understanding that it’s a crime in all its ramifications”

Days ago, Abubakar Malami (SAN), the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) granted an interview to Channels Television in which he faulted Southern Governors’ ban on open grazing. The AGF is wrong; Southern Governors are right, and here’s why:

Before one can graze, he must be a cattle rearer or a herdsman. The herdsman would have to enter another person’s land. If the herdsman is grazing on his own land, it does not implicate any legal, safety or economic issues because the land belongs to him. But when he goes upon another man’s land to graze without permission or some leave and license, he commits trespass, civil and criminal trespass to boot.

Conversely, there is no written law in Nigeria that permits herders to enter into another man’s land without the owner’s permission. Not even the Nigerian Constitution cited Malami. The part of the Constitution he relied on allows freedom of movement of persons, not animals, whether goats, pigs or cattle. And such freedom must be exercised in a peaceable and legal manner, not by force, not by trespass, not by terror.

Most people think that trespass is only a civil wrong in which you go to a civil court to claim monetary damages and have the trespasser expelled from your property through a civil court order. It is much more than that.

In Northern Nigeria where the Attorney-General and these herdsmen hail from, Section 342 of the Penal Code (applicable to Northern Nigeria) provides that ‘Whoever enters into or upon property in the possession of another with intent to commit an offence or to intimidate, insult or annoy a person in possession of that property, or, having lawfully entered into or upon that property, unlawfully remains there with intent thereby to intimidate, insult or annoy such person or with intent to commit an offence, is said to commit criminal trespass’.

Open grazing intimidates, insults and annoys. And in this era, it terrorizes, kills and destroys properties. What more do you need before understanding that it’s a crime in all its ramifications.

Criminal trespass is punishable by arrest, arraignment, prosecution and imprisonment. Again, this is northern Nigeria where these herders hail from. There are other laws of Nigeria that border on assault, manslaughter, murder, malicious destruction of property, disorderly conduct, breach of the peace and laws on land use that are violated whenever herdsmen graze without permission and oftentimes with violence.

So, without any new law banning open grazing, Southern Governors can assert their authority under these extant laws, including particularly under Section 1 of the Land Use Act, which provides that “Subject to the provisions of this Act, all land comprised in the territory of each State in the Federation are hereby vested in the Governor of that State … ”.

Additionally, AGF Malami appears to be unaware of the highly celebrated 1969 ruling by Justice Adewale Thompson. That the ruling was never set aside or varied makes it part of the laws of Nigeria when it comes to open grazing. It’s pertinent to state that the ruling was made in the context of the ‘farmer-herder conflict’ of that era. That is what we used to have then. What we have now is ‘herder-terrorism’ that requires new measures that should more drastic than the purports of that ruling.

In the ruling, Adewale’s court heard that it is the custom of the Fulani to move cattle from place to place and graze openly. The judge ruled that if that is the custom, it is a bad one because it is against public policy; that the custom has the tendency to lead to breach of law and order and unconscionable destruction of another’s property. You might add that, in this day and age, it has gone from mere destruction of property to destruction of lives.

That judgment is sound because it is consistent with the common law of Nigeria that says that any custom that is against public policy shall be set aside. A custom is not cast in stone. Nigerian laws only allow good customs. Bad customs like killing of twins are no longer allowed. In the same vein, bad customs like open grazing that destroys properties and human lives should be banned.

That something is a custom does not automatically make it legal. Therefore, that open grazing is customary to the Fulani does not make it legal or permissible, especially if it comes with the prospects of criminal trespass or terror. And in comparison to the spare parts dealers Malami mentioned, he forgot that they rent their shops and they conduct their business sans trespass, violence, rape and terror.

Further, as a Northerner and a high-ranking government official with access to intelligence, AGF Malami should not pretend that he doesn’t know that a significant number of these herdsmen are foreigners. Some notable Northern leaders (including the Presidency) have publicly confirmed as such. On this score, did AGF Malami consider what happens to Nigeria’s sovereignty when he argued that banning open grazing is unconstitutional? Is he suggesting that foreigners now have more constitutional rights than Nigerians, especially Southern Nigerians?

Not just that, these foreign herdsmen come into Nigeria with a swag to graze on Nigerian lands without permission and they are ever prepared to kill their host if he dares resist such brazen criminal trespass. And the federal government does nothing to check it. But once the herders get in trouble, such as now with Southern Governors, the same federal government jumps to their defense, as AGF Malami just did.

That’s unfair because you are stoking a situation where States (especially Southern States) will be propelled to resort to self-help, which is exactly what Southern Governors have done by banning open grazing.


Ejimakor, an American trained Lawyer, wrote in from Alaigbo

Nigeria Governors Forum Endorses Autonomy For Judiciary, Legislature |The Source

0
Nigeria Govenors forum

By Ayodele Oni

There are indications that the ongoing strike by Judicial workers Union may soon be called off going by feelers that emerged from the meeting of the 36 Governors under the eagis of the Nigerian Governors Forum, (NGF), held virually on Wednesday.

It was learnt that the Governors have agreed to grant autonomy to the Legislature and the Judiciary in line with Executive Order10 signed by President Muhammadu Buhari.

There are, however, conditions under which the implementation can be achieved.

These are immediate termination of the ongoing strike by Judicial workers and  the disbandment of the Presidential Implementation Committee on the Autonomy of State Legislature and Judiciary.

According to the Governors, ending the strike would enable States to fine tune the legal framework to back the decisions.

The Governors accused the Autonomy Committee of “acting as a permanent committee, basically misguiding and overheating the relationship between State Governments and the other arms of Government.”

The Governors were united on the need to achieve debt limit and sustainability, as well as the full deregulation of the downstream oil sector/withdrawal of subsidy.

The meeting, presided over by the Chairman of NGF, Dr Kayode Fayemi, Ekiti state Governor, was called mainly to discuss the details of Executive Order 10, signed by President Buhari and the new wave of Covid 19 upsurge.

Attorney General, Abubakar Malami, Is An Agent Of Myetti Allah – Afenifere |The Source

0

By Ayodele Oni

Secretary General of Afenifere, Chief Sola Ebiseni, has said the Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, is behaving like an Agent and Spokesman of Myetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association.

Ebiseni, a lawyer and former Commissioner in Ondo State, observed in a Statement in Akure on Thursday that the Chief Law Officer of the Federation has turned his office to an extension of Fulani Herdsmen.

According to him, “The sectarian and emotional vituperations of  Abubakar Malami,  the Attorney General of the Federal Government on the ban of open grazing of Cattle by the Governors of Southern Nigeria did not come to discerning Nigerians as a surprise.

“It only pitiably exposed him as being most unfit for the office of an Attorney General, having always allowed his sectarian disposition becloud his eminent qualifications.

“Malami does not want serious minded people to accord him and his high office each time he accepts to play the roles of errand boy and spokesperson of the Miyetti Allah and their herders members.

“Each time Malami perceives a threat to the interests of Fulani herdsmen, he is quick to latch on to constitutional provisions which are not relevant to the object of discourse.

“He was readily on hand to vehemently denounce the Amotekun South West regional security initiative as being targeted against Fulani herdsmen and so declared it unconstitutional.

“When challenged to approach the Court, he had since developed cold feet.

“Contrary to his latest vituperations, the ban on open grazing and movement of animals by foot is not a denial of  “freedom and liberty of movement” and does not require the slightest touch of the constitution for the governor to pronounce.

“For the attention of Malami, most of the states already have laws banning open grazing and the pronouncement of the Governors was merely to give effect to an existing law.

“It is the animal that is being prohibited from grazing openly and being moved by foot, except Malami intends to extend the inalienable human rights in the constitution to animals in the defence  of a culture, which values cattle than human beings.

“It is the same primitive mindset of which the Buhari administration has threatened the Governor of Benue State that he would have no place except he allowed a free reign of animals.

“Malami was mischievously playing the role of an  agent provocateur when he was inciting Northern Governors to place a ban on spare parts trading in which southerners are involved.

“In deference to their religious and cultural sensibilities, some of the northern states made laws banning trading in alcoholic substances and have been seen destroying such wares in their millions notwithstanding that they share in the VAT collected on those goods and no one is crying over it.

“We in the Afenifere supports the resolutions of the Southern Governors banning open grazing and movement of cattle by foot in our territory.

“Those who can cope with the destruction of farm lands and produce by animals and are also permissive of criminality by terrorist herdsmen, are free to open their vast lands for such purposes.

“Nigeria will only exist and thrive on the terms agreeable by all its constituent nationalities.

“Officials of the Federal Government should be advised that their jaundiced sectarian views are eloquent testimony that the Buhari administration has lost the confidence of the generality of Nigerians.”

Malami has come under attack from several quarters  for saying that the ban on open grazing by Southern Governors is illegal.

Ekiti Gov Fayemi Overrules LG Chairman Over Imposition Of Curfew |The Source

0

By Ayodele Oni

Ekiti State Government has overruled the Chairman of Ikere Local Government’s order imposing curfew on the entire Council Area.

The Chairman, Mr Ayodele Oluwafemi, had announced on Wednesday evening that a curfew has been imposed following the escalating cult clashes in the area in the last three weeks.

His announcement generated mixed reactions as Heads of Security Agencies in the area claimed ignorance of the Chairman’s order.

The Management of the State University, in the town however directed staff and students of the institution to comply with the order.

The Chairman claimed that the 6p.m to 6a.m curfew was due to the recent clashes of rival group of cultists which resulted to killings in the town.

Two more persons were feared killed on Wednesday as a result of the unending clashes among warring cult members that have turned the town to a war zone.

Mr Oluwafemi, who had earlier, on Thursday morning lifted the curfew order, apparently sensing that he has no such power to impose curfew,  lauded the people of lkere-Ekiti for their compliance with the curfew declaration, saying if the curfew continues, it will lead to suffering of innocent people and will affect the economy of the town.

He said the joint security task force recently inaugurated in the Council will work together to fish out the suspected cultists.

However, the State Government, through the Commissioner for Information, Mr Amin Omole, announced on the state radio that the curfew has been lifted, urging the people to go about their normal duties.

OPINION: The Travails of Malam Nasir El-Rufai |The Source

0
Azu Ishiekwene

By Azu Ishiekwene

The list was long and the contents harsh and threatening. The notices may have been issued separately, but they landed like a packaged digital bomb in my WhatsApp inbox.

Eight unions, apart from the central body, had collectively declared war on Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir el-Rufai. The die was cast.

The unions were the Nigeria Union of Railway Workers; the National Union of Banks, Insurance and Financial Institutions Employees; the Amalgamated Union of Public Corporations, Civil Service Technical and Recreational Services Employees; the Non-Academic Staff Union of Educational and Associated Institutions; the National Union of Electricity Employees; the National Union of Teachers; the National Union of Food Beverage and Tobacco Employees; the Radio, Television, Theatre and Arts Workers Union of Nigeria; and of course, the national and state chapters of the Nigeria Labour Congress.

When I saw copies of the notices by these unions between May 10 and 14, threatening to start a five-day warning strike in Kaduna by midnight on Sunday, I knew that the haven of Nigeria’s northern elite, which has been at the centre of much grief in recent times, was heading for more trouble.

Perhaps because they already have swathes of the state in the grips, the only groups that did not threaten el-Rufai with ultimatum last week were kidnappers and bandits, although el-Rufai being el-Rufai, he still described the striking workers as “bandits”.

How did the state dig itself into this hole?

In April, el-Rufai said he was fed up with using resources meant for the state’s nine million people to look after about 100,000 civil servants who consume 90 per cent of the resources.

He did not say what the exact figures were, but records show that Kaduna receives a monthly average allocation of N4.2billion from Abuja, which, in fact, is the monthly average for the 36 states.

If civil servants alone received 90 per cent of that figure, minus what is generated internally by the government, it means that for every one naira that comes from Abuja, civil servants – who are roughly one per cent of the population – get 90k. At that rate, even if civil servants consumed everything, including what is borrowed, the state will still have to enter their pockets to fill it.

Labour insists that el-Rufai is telling one side of the story. NLC President, Ayuba Wabba, said the problem with Kaduna is not the number of civil servants on payroll, but the appetite of the governor whose political appointees are feeding fat on the state.

Again, he did not provide the figures the same way he also accused the governor of redistributing property grabbed from ordinary people to his “capitalist confederates” without naming them.

Labour’s main grouse is that thousands of teachers sacked since 2017 have not been paid. They also accused the governor of violating labour laws by retiring workers before 35 years of service or 60 years of age and for failing to consult with labour as provided under the law, preferring instead, to take the law into his own hands.

Kaduna may be in the eye of the storm but the states, almost without exception, are in a bad place. If they were companies, the management would have filed for bankruptcy. Apart from Lagos, which generates the equivalent of the internal revenues of at least 24 other states put together, virtually all the states are struggling.

Only last month, Edo State Governor, Godwin Obaseki, said the Central Bank printed between N50billion and N60billion in March to keep government afloat. In the last six years President Muhammadu Buhari’s government has bailed out the states twice mainly to pay salaries.

The first bailout was less than three months after his election in 2015, when he signed off $2.1billion for salary arrears in states, and then again two years later when another N614billion was shelled out to states where salaries were being owed for upwards of seven months.

With the steady fall in the price of oil and the COVID-19 pandemic, government revenue has fallen by nearly 60 percent and Abuja which has been bailing out the states is in need of a bailout.

In the crossfire between el-Rufai and labour, it’s easy to miss the point. The governor has been criticised – and rightly – for declaring Wabba wanted and putting a bounty on his head. He has no power to do so under the law nor does his exaggerated opinion of himself do him any favours.

But labour is not exactly smelling of roses. It is wrong for federal workers that are not direct parties in the dispute to be involved in a local strike and to behave as if they had been looking for an opportunity to ground the state.

What business, for example, did railway workers, electricity workers or airport staff, have joining the strike when these services are wholly owned and funded federal agencies? It is hypocritical to condemn or criticise el-Rufai for behaving like a tyrant without calling out the lawlessness of federal workers who maliciously weaponised the strike.

El-Rufai’s tongue, twice his body size and often more deadly than poisoned arrow, would always get him in trouble. Yet often, his competence redeems his bad politics and other congenital flaws.

At a time when many states are on their knees and internal revenue has fallen catastrophically, Kaduna increased its internal revenue over four times between 2015 and 2019, raising it to 40 percent of the state’s budget, when others like Bayelsa and Adamawa are at a miserable 10 per cent.

Even though Kaduna is far less endowed than many northern states, it beats them hands down in its investment per capita in education and other social infrastructure.

Other states may be having a good laugh at el-Rufai’s expense now, but their own chicken is coming home to roost. Even though the national minimum wage law was signed two years ago, at least 11 states are not paying, a dozen or so are paying only a category of workers, while a few, which actually started paying, have reverted to the old wage.

Of course, there are still quite a few governors who created useless positions, as “jobs for the boys”. But the harsh economic reality has forced a number of them to reduce the salaries paid to these appointees by half.

A nationwide survey by the public sector finance watchdog, BudgIT in 2017, showed that 20 states owed workers salaries and pensions ranging from one to 36 months, while Imo, Taraba and Niger States were owing two to three years’ pension arrears.

Not to provoke a labour backlash, many of them have invented ways of managing public sector pay misery, mostly by simply kicking the can down the road, which is what el-Rufai has refused to do.

Yet, to talk about public service pay misery, is to put the cart before the horse. The real virus that first infected the place from the federal, and later on to the state levels, was the indiscriminate and vindictive purge during the military era. The service has since been a shadow of itself – bloated, corrupt and largely bereft of capacity.

Politicians have not made things any better. They have made the public service a dumping ground for incompetents; it’s the first place they think of when they want to settle political IOUs, and the last when they need quality support or advice.

Today, the monster they created is coming back to haunt them and the beast already used to years of freeloading, won’t go away quietly.

There’s no easy way out. El-Rufai must suspend his bluster and seize the opportunity provided by the federal government’s intervention to engage labour in a clear and transparent manner. He must also stand firm and resist the temptation for a quick fix.

Labour should avoid the temptation to extract commitments that may please its members now, but which may, in fact, be empty promises in the long run. How this matter is settled would determine how quickly other states begin to tackle similar problems – or whether, once again, they’ll kick the can down the road.


 

Ishiekwene is the Editor-In-Chief of LEADERSHIP

Open Grazing: Nigerians Attack Malami

0

By James Orji

Governor Rotimi Akeredolu of Ondo state has fired back at Abubakar Malami, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, just hours after the nation’s chief law officer said Northern Governors could also ban spare parts sellers, the same way Southern Governors proscribed open grazing in their area.

Apart from the Ondo Governor, those that have lashed out at Malami include Atedo Peterside, the founder of Stambic  IBTC Bank and Olu Adegboruwa, a rights activist and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN

For instance, Peterside on Thursday in a tweet said it was hypocritical of Malami to link a ban on open grazing to the constitutional right to the free movement of persons.

“It is disingenuous to link a ban on open grazing to the constitutional right to the free movement of persons. The latter does not extend to the free movement of cattle, goats, sheep etc through farms with the attendant destruction of somebody’s harvest,” Peterside said.

Atedo Peterside
Peterside Faults Malami

Adegboruwa said “You cannot deploy the right to movement of person and cattle to violate the right of another citizen to own property, such as land or farmland, or else you become a trespasser.

“It is in this regard that I disagree with the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation, when he said that the ban on open grazing is unconstitutional. That cannot represent a proper interpretation of the Constitution, with all due respect.”

17 governors from the south, last week met in Asaba, Delta state where they banned open grazing of livestock and the movement of cattle by foot from the Northern part of the country down south.

But speaking on a television programme on Wednesday, Malami described the action of the 17 governors unconstitutional, warning that northern governors could ban spare parts sales in the region, in retaliation.

Most spare parts sellers in the northern part of the country are from the south while pastoralists are predominantly Fulani from the North.

Malami said “It is a dangerous provision for any governor in Nigeria to think he can bring any compromise on the freedom and liberty of individuals to move around,” Malami said during an interview on Channels Television‘s Politics Today programme on Wednesday.

“It is about constitutionality within the context of the freedoms expressed in our constitution. Can you deny the rights of a Nigerian? For example, it is as good as saying, perhaps, maybe, the northern governors coming together to say they prohibit spare parts trading in the north.”

In his response to the AGF, Governor Akeredolu who is the chairman of the Southern Governors’ Forum, said Malami is emotional over the issue, urging him to go to court to challenge the governors’ decision not to allow cows to be moved on foot across the south.

According to a statement personally signed by the governor on Thursday titled ‘Our Decision Irreversible and Will Be Enforced” Governor Akeredolu, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN like Malami said the AGF does not take the issue of life serious by comparing ban on open grazing with spare parts.

Akeredolu said “I have just read the press statement credited to the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Shehu Malami SAN on the resolution of the Southern Governors Forum to ban open grazing in their respective States. The AGF is quoted to have said that this reasoned decision, among others, is akin to banning all spare parts dealers in the Northern parts of the country and is unconstitutional.

‘It is most unfortunate that the AGF is unable to distill issues as expected of a Senior Advocate. Nothing can be more disconcerting. This outburst should, ordinarily, not elicit response from reasonable people who know the distinction between a legitimate business that is not in anyway injurious and a certain predilection for anarchy.

“Clinging to an anachronistic model of animal husbandry, which is evidently injurious to harmonious relationship between the herders and the farmers as well as the local populace, is wicked and arrogant.”

The Ondo Governor said the AGF has betrayed the trust of many Nigerians who depend on him as the chief law officer of the nation for the maintenance of law and order.

He said “comparing this anachronism, which has led to loss of lives, farmlands and property, and engendered untold hardship on the host communities, with buying and selling of auto parts is not only strange. It, annoyingly, betrays a terrible mindset.

“Mr Malami is advised to approach the court to challenge the legality of the Laws of the respective States baning open grazing and decision of the Southern Governor Forum taken in the interest of their people. We shall be most willing to meet him in Court.

The decision to ban open grazing stays. It will be enforced with vigour,” the governor said.