Home Blog Page 14

INEC Presents Certificate Of Return To Gov. Oyebanji

0
Gov Oyebanji gets Cettificate of Return

By Ayodele Oni

 

Ekiti State Governor and candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in last Saturday’s governorship election, Biodun Oyebanji, on Tuesday received his Certificate of Return from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), pledging to deepen good governance and accelerate sustainable development across the State.

 

The National Commissioner in charge of Oyo, Ekiti and Lagos  States, Mr Sam Olumekun, presented the certificate to Governor Oyebanji at a brief ceremony held at the INEC State Office in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital.

 

His running mate and incumbent Deputy Governor, Chief (Mrs) Monisade Afuye, also received her certificate at the event.

 

Governor Oyebanji, won the June 20 governorship election with a total of 319,224 votes, becoming the first governor in Ekiti State’s history to secure two consecutive electoral mandates.

 

Speaking shortly after receiving the certificate, Governor Oyebanji, accompanied by his wife, Dr Olayemi Oyebanji, expressed appreciation to the people of Ekiti State for renewing his mandate.

 

He described the outcome of the election as a strong vote of confidence in his administration.

 

The Governor stated that his second term would focus on consolidating existing achievements, while implementing policies aimed at improving citizens’ welfare, stimulating economic growth, and strengthening infrastructure across the State.

 

He commended INEC, security agencies, and electoral officials for their professionalism and commitment to delivering a peaceful, free, and credible election, noting significant improvements following amendments to the Electoral Act.

 

Governor Oyebanji also lauded the people of Ekiti State for their peaceful conduct before, during, and after the election, emphasizing that the victory belongs to all residents of the State.

 

He renewed call on other contestants to join hands with his administration in advancing the development of Ekiti.

 

“Let me first appreciate God for His faithfulness; today would not have been possible without Him. After God, I must acknowledge the support of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, particularly for his courage in signing the new Electoral Act into law.

 

“This election is the first to be conducted under the amended Electoral Act, and the improvement in INEC’s performance is evident. The Commission deserves commendation for its professionalism, fairness, and transparency.

 

“I also commend the security agencies and the good people of Ekiti for ensuring a peaceful process.

 

“As a State just 29 years old, this stands as one of our most peaceful elections, reflecting the positive reforms shaping our political culture,” the Governor said.

 

Earlier in his remarks, the National Commissioner, Mr. Olumekun, praised the peaceful conduct of Ekiti residents, describing the election as a model of democratic practice.

 

He also appreciated security agencies and stakeholders for their roles in the successful conduct of the poll and reaffirmed INEC’s commitment to strengthening Nigeria’s democracy through credible and inclusive elections.

Kebbi Senator Resigns From APC, Join ADC

0
Senator Musa Garba Maidoki
Senator Musa Garba Maidoki

By Suleiman Anyalewechi

 

The gale of high profile defections rocking the ruling All Progressive Congress APC post-primaries has continued unabated even with the closure of  Independent National Electoral Commission INEC’s 2027  nomination window, with the the Senator representing Kebbi South Senatorial District Garba Musa Maidoki announcing his exit on Tuesday.

 

Citing unresolved primaries-induced internal tension and disagreements as a  major reason, Senator Maidoki, who is the Deputy Senate spokesperson, informed that he has switched allegiance to the  the African Democratic Congress.

 

Senator Maidoki’s realignment is coming on the heels of a  failed bid to secure a return ticket to the red  chamber of the National Assembly ahead of the 2027 general elections.

 

He emphasized that his decision to abandon the APC and join forces with the ADC followed what he described as “wide consultations with constituents, stakeholders and supporters over the lingering internal wranglings bedeviling APC after the primaries’.

 

“There is a lingering internal crisis in the APC, especially arising from the Kebbi state primary elections.

 

“After due  consultations with my constituents, I have decided to defect to the ADC which I believe aligns more with the interests of my district”, Maidoki stated .

 

The source reports that  Maidoki’s defection came amidst last minute spirited efforts by some APC chieftains including the Deputy Senate President, Barau Jibrin to dissuade him.

 

The ADC has particularly been the major beneficiary of the spate of defections that has hit APC in the North ,since the conclusion of its primaries late May, 2026.

Social Media Platforms No Go Area For Serving Police Officers – IGP Issues Directive

0
IGP Tunji Disu
IGP Tunji Disu

By Ayodele Oni 

 

With immediate effect, the Inspector-General of Police (IGP), Olatunji Disu, has banned serving officers and men of the Nigeria Police Force from engaging in unauthorised content creation on social media platforms such as TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and other related platforms.

 

The directive prohibits officers from creating, posting, or monetising videos, skits, live streams, or any other form of online content that identifies them as members of the Nigeria Police Force without official approval.

 

The directive was contained in an internal circular dated June 22, 2026, and marked “Restricted – For Official Use Only,” which has now been circulated to senior police formations nationwide.

 

According to the document, the ban follows concerns over what the Force described as a “growing and most disturbing trend” of officers using social media for entertainment, self-promotion, and commercial gain while in uniform or identifying as police personnel.

 

 The circular stated: “I am directed by the Inspector-General of Police to draw the attention of all Commands, Formations, Departments and Units to the growing and most disturbing trend of police officers and men creating and publishing videos, conducting live sessions, and participating in social media platforms particularly TikTok, Instagram Reels, Facebook Live, YouTube, and similar platforms while in police uniform or in circumstances that identify them as members of the Nigeria Police Force, without lawful authority.”

 

 It further warned that officers are prohibited from operating personal or anonymous accounts for content creation, entertainment, brand promotion, or monetisation where such activities are linked to their status as police personnel.

 

 The circular noted that officers had been “producing and posting videos of themselves in police uniform on TikTok, Instagram, Facebook and other platforms for entertainment, personal promotion and financial gain,” as well as engaging in other conduct deemed unbecoming.

 

The IGP also barred officers from publicly commenting on police operations, internal disciplinary matters, investigations, transfers, or other sensitive security issues without authorisation.

 

It stated that officers were “publicly commenting on official police operations, disciplinary matters, internal affairs and national security issues without authorisation,” a practice the Force said undermines discipline and institutional integrity.

 

 In one of the strongest provisions of the directive, the Force warned that violations would attract strict disciplinary actions, including immediate interdiction, salary forfeiture, demotion, dismissal from service, and possible prosecution under relevant laws.

 

 The circular also introduced supervisory accountability, stating that senior officers, including Commissioners of Police (CPs) and Divisional Police Officers, (DPOs)would be held responsible for failing to prevent or report violations by personnel under their command.

 

It added that supervisory officers who fail in their duties would be deemed to have breached their responsibilities, as the Force moves to enforce stricter compliance across all formations.

 

The Police Force said the move is aimed at restoring discipline, professionalism, and public trust, stressing that officers must prioritise operational duties over online entertainment or commercial content creation.

President Tinubu Transmits State Police Amendment Bill To Senate

0
President Bola Tinubu
President Bola Tinubu

By Ayodele Oni

 

A new chapter in Nigeria’s security revolution has taken further step as President Bola Tinubu transmitted a Constitution Alteration Bill seeking the establishment of state police to the Senate.

 

The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, disclosed this during Tuesday’s plenary, adding that the Senate will consider the constitutional amendment bill on Wednesday.

 

Akpabio also announced that states have promised to consider the state police bill on the same day once they receive it.

 

Tinubu had in February, urged the National Assembly to amend the Constitution to accommodate state police, describing the reform as necessary to tackle terrorism, banditry and other security threats.

 

During his Democracy Day address earlier this month, the President vowed that terrorists, bandits and their sponsors would face the full weight of the law, insisting that no mercy would be shown to enemies of the state.

 

Tinubu revealed that more than 13,000 terrorists had been neutralised within the last year and noted that terrorism-related deaths had fallen significantly compared to previous years.

 

The proposed legislation seeks to amend relevant provisions of the 1999 Constitution to create a legal framework for state police across the federation.

 

The move follows repeated calls by the President for constitutional reforms to enable states to play a greater role in securing their territories.

 

However, he acknowledged that the continued captivity of schoolchildren abducted in Oyo and Borno states remained a painful reminder of the country’s security challenges.

 

The state police proposal has gained momentum in recent months, with both chambers of the National Assembly advancing constitutional amendment processes aimed at decentralising policing powers to the states.

 

The Senate reconvened on Tuesday, for an emergency plenary session as lawmakers move to pass the bill and advance one of the most far-reaching security reforms in the country’s democratic history.

 

If approved, the reform would give states greater responsibility in protecting their communities, while creating a new structure for tackling rising security threats, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and other violent crimes.

 

The move follows years of national debate over whether Nigeria’s centralised policing system is strong enough to respond effectively to security challenges across its vast territories.

Revisiting the June 12 National Honours List

0
Bola Ahmed Tinubu

By Tony Onyima, Ph.D.

 

In 2018, former President Muhammadu Buhari took a historic step, moving Nigeria’s Democracy Day from May 29 to June 12. The decision, made 25 years after the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, remains one of the most significant acts of symbolic justice in Nigeria’s democratic journey. Buhari reinforced the gesture by signing the Public Holiday Amendment Act into law on June 10, 2019, formally institutionalising June 12 as the nation’s Democracy Day.

 

Since taking office three years ago, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has maintained the observance of the day. In his address marking this year’s Democracy Day, he aptly described June 12 as occupying “a sacred place in our national memory,” noting that it represents “more than an election; it is a defining chapter in our story.”

 

Indeed, June 12 was more than a political contest. It was a watershed moment that demonstrated the possibility of a united Nigerian nation rising above ethnic, religious, and regional divisions. Widely acclaimed as the freest and fairest election in the country’s history, it produced a clear mandate for Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (M.K.O.) Abiola of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), who secured 8,341,309 votes, representing 58.36 per cent of the votes cast, against Bashir Tofa of the National Republican Convention (NRC), who garnered 5,952,087 votes, or 41.64 per cent.

 

The annulment of that election by the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida on 23 June 1993 plunged the nation into a prolonged political crisis. It sparked widespread protests, civil resistance, and international condemnation, eventually forcing Babangida from office. The ill-fated Interim National Government, headed by Chief Ernest Shonekan, survived barely three months before it was overthrown by General Sani Abacha, ushering in one of the darkest periods in Nigeria’s political history.

 

Against this backdrop, President Tinubu’s decision to confer national honours on 55 individuals, in his words, “suffered persecution, endured indignities, exile, incarceration and, at times, solitary confinement so that we may have democracy today,” is both commendable and necessary. Nations preserve their history not only through monuments and archives but also by publicly recognising those who sacrificed for freedom and justice.

Yet, while the honours mark an important step towards preserving the memory of June 12, they also highlight an enduring challenge: the incomplete documentation of those who contributed to the struggle. As with the 2025 honours list, this year’s roll call has raised legitimate concerns about notable omissions.

Last year, the family of the late Chief Adekunle Ajasin, leader of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), publicly expressed disappointment at his exclusion from the list of pro-democracy heroes honoured by the President. Their reaction was understandable. Ajasin was a central figure in the resistance to military rule and played a pivotal role in sustaining the democratic movement. Although the Presidency promised to address the omission and subsequently made some corrections, fresh gaps have emerged.

Among those deserving recognition are distinguished journalists such as Lewis Obi, Nsikak Essien, Mike Awoyinfa, and Eziuche Ubani. Obi was the pioneer editor and managing director of African Concord. He suffered more in the hands of the military than some of the names on the list. Essien and Awoyinfa were leading editors at Concord Newspapers, one of the media organisations that stood firmly against military dictatorship at enormous institutional and personal cost. The newspaper’s relentless opposition to authoritarian rule ultimately led to its closure. It is difficult to justify honouring some of their subordinates while overlooking the editors who provided leadership, direction, and courage during those perilous years.

Similarly, Ubani, then Political Editor of THISDAY, distinguished himself through fearless reporting and incisive commentary against the Abacha regime. His writings drew sustained persecution, eventually forcing him into exile. He returned to Nigeria only on the eve of Abacha’s death. His story mirrors the sacrifices of numerous journalists whose pens became instruments of democratic resistance.

Beyond the media and political class, there are other figures whose contributions merit national recognition. Cardinal Anthony Olubunmi Okogie, then Archbishop of Lagos, emerged as one of the most respected moral voices during the crisis years. At a time when many institutions chose silence, he consistently challenged authoritarian excesses and defended democratic values. His interventions helped sustain public confidence and lent moral legitimacy to the pro-democracy struggle.

Equally significant was Walter Carrington, then the United States Ambassador to Nigeria. Carrington used the influence of his office to draw international attention to Nigeria’s democratic crisis and became an important advocate for human rights and democratic governance. His role demonstrated that the struggle for June 12 was not merely a domestic political contest but a cause that resonated with democratic forces worldwide.

The broader point is that the June 12 struggle was won not by politicians alone. It was sustained by journalists, labour leaders, students, religious figures, diplomats, civil society activists, lawyers, academics, and countless ordinary citizens whose names may never appear in history books. Many endured detention, exile, harassment, economic hardship, and threats to their lives. Some paid the ultimate price. Others continue to live quietly among us, their sacrifices largely forgotten.

This is why recognising June 12 heroes must move beyond periodic additions to an honours list. Piecemeal recognition risks reducing a monumental national struggle to a selective exercise in remembrance. History demands something more deliberate, comprehensive, and enduring.

 

President Tinubu is uniquely positioned to undertake this task. As a prominent figure in the June 12 resistance and a victim of military persecution, he understands better than most the breadth of sacrifices that sustained the democratic movement. He therefore bears both a moral responsibility and a historic obligation to ensure that no genuine June 12 hero is left behind.

The time has come for the Federal Government to establish an independent committee comprising historians, archivists, journalists, civil society leaders, and pro-democracy movement veterans to compile a definitive, authoritative register of June 12 heroes. In addition, Nigeria should establish a permanent June 12 Hall of Fame or Democracy Museum to preserve the stories, documents, photographs, and personal sacrifices of these patriots for future generations. Democracy did not arrive as a gift. It was earned through courage, sacrifice, and perseverance. The least a grateful nation can do is remember all who fought for it and honour them accordingly.


Onyima, an accomplished  Journalist, was the MD/EIC of The Sun Group of Newspapers, and later, a Commissioner in Anambra State

From “Jonathan Must Go” to “How Dare You”: Nigeria’s Politics of Hypocrisy

0
Bola Tinubu And Jonathan

By Fred Chukwuelobe

 

“Citizens who demanded accountability yesterday cannot become offended when others demand the same accountability today. The principle must remain constant. No leader should be above criticism, and no government should be exempt from the standards it once imposed on others”

 

When President Goodluck Jonathan was in office, opposition politicians, influential clerics, and many public commentators, including some who now occupy positions of power, took turns criticising his administration. At various times, they described him as clueless, demanded his resignation, and openly questioned his competence. Yet, the challenges facing Nigeria at that time were nowhere near the scale of the economic hardship, insecurity, and public discontent being experienced today.

 

Therefore, when Peter Obi recently called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to resign, citing developments in Britain where a Prime Minister stepped down, Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga dismissed the demand as “childish” and attempted to justify his position by arguing that Nigeria does not operate a parliamentary system of government.

 

That response misses the point entirely.

 

First, Peter Obi is fully within his democratic rights to call on the President to resign, just as many opposition figures, including those now in government, did during the Jonathan era. Such a call may be accepted or rejected by the President, but it is neither childish nor ignorant. What is childish is to suggest that citizens or opposition figures lose their right to demand accountability simply because the occupant of power has changed, or on account of the type of democracy that we practice.

 

Second, while it is true that Nigeria does not practise parliamentary democracy, that fact does not invalidate public demands for resignation. Democracies around the world, regardless of the system they operate, recognise the right of citizens and opposition leaders to express dissatisfaction with the performance of those in power.

 

The real issue is not whether Nigeria operates a parliamentary or presidential system. The real issue is political culture.

 

In many advanced democracies, political leaders view public office primarily as service to the nation. They understand that leadership is a trust, not a personal entitlement. When public confidence collapses or when they believe they have become a liability to governance, many choose to step aside. In such societies, public office holders are accountable not only at the ballot box but also to public opinion, party structures, and institutional checks.

 

Nigeria’s political reality is different. Here, resignation is often viewed as weakness rather than responsibility. Political office is fiercely protected, regardless of public sentiment. It is almost unthinkable for a ruling party to ask its leader to step aside, and even more unlikely for an incumbent president to resign in response to public pressure. That is not because our Constitution forbids resignation; it is because our political culture discourages it.

 

The same principle applies to some religious leaders who have suddenly discovered reasons why they should not criticise the current administration with the same intensity they deployed against the Jonathan government. Their explanations have not convinced many Nigerians.

 

Former President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, has broken ranks with those offering excuses and openly advised President Tinubu not to seek re-election. His intervention has reignited questions about consistency and sincerity among religious leaders who were once vocal critics of government but now appear reluctant to speak with the same courage.

 

The uncomfortable truth is that much of what passes for political and religious activism in Nigeria is often influenced by personal, ethnic, regional, or political loyalties. The standards applied to one leader are frequently abandoned when another leader from a preferred political or ethnic bloc assumes office.

 

That is why Nigerians should be wary of selective outrage.

 

Whether one agrees with Peter Obi or not is beside the point. The fundamental issue is that citizens in a democracy have the right to demand accountability from their leaders. They have the right to criticise government policies. They have the right to call for resignations when they believe leadership has failed.

 

Democracy does not end on election day. It requires continuous scrutiny of those entrusted with power.

 

Nigeria may not operate a parliamentary system, but accountability is not exclusive to parliamentary democracies. It is the lifeblood of every genuine democracy. Citizens who demanded accountability yesterday cannot become offended when others demand the same accountability today.

 

The principle must remain constant: no leader should be above criticism, and no government should be exempt from the standards it once imposed on others.


Chukwuelobe is an accomplished Journalist and Media Consultant

Pastor Oritsejafor On President Tinubu’s Govt: “Average Nigerian Today Has No Hope, Except Hope That Comes From God”

0
Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor and President Bola Tinubu

By Ayodele Oni

 

Former President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, has remarked that Nigeria’s economic hardship and security challenges have worsened under the current government.

 

“The government of Tinubu has done more harm to this nation than we have ever experienced,” he stated.

 

Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Oritsejafor pointed out that many of the politicians that relentlessly criticized former President Goodluck Jonathan are now in power but have failed to deliver meaningful improvements for Nigerians

 

Although he stopped short of demanding Tinubu’s resignation, Oritsejafor urged the president to be realistic about his capacity to tackle the nation’s growing problems.

 

“I will not sit here and tell him to resign. But I will say this: don’t pretend to know what to do when you don’t. Don’t pretend you can rescue Nigeria from its current state if you know you cannot,” he said.

 

Oritsejafor who is the founder and senior pastor of Word of Life Bible Church, Warri, also advised Tinubu against pursuing a second term in office.

 

“Don’t begin to dream of coming back to continue this same mess,” he said.

 

Oritsejafor defended former President  Jonathan’s record while in office and challenged the credibility of those who branded the former president “clueless,” insisting that the country’s challenges have persisted and in some cases worsened under the leaders who once positioned themselves as better alternatives.

 

According to Oritsejafor, those who led the charge against Jonathan have yet to justify the expectations they created, raising questions about whether their criticism was driven by genuine concern for Nigeria or political ambition.

 

“Where are those people now? Are they not the same people today who are in power?

 

“They called him clueless, yet they would not allow him to implement the policies he believed were necessary.

 

“They organized protests against him across the country, especially in Lagos.

 

“The people who sponsored those protests and drove those campaigns are largely the same people in power today. They claimed to have the solutions, but look at where Nigeria is now,” he said.

 

When asked whether he regretted supporting Jonathan during the 2015 presidential election, Oritsejafor was unequivocal.

 

“No, I don’t,” he replied.

 

Although he stopped short of demanding Tinubu’s resignation, Oritsejafor urged the president to be realistic about his capacity to tackle the nation’s growing problems.

 

He further criticized the administration’s “Renewed Hope” agenda, arguing that many Nigerians are yet to experience any meaningful improvement in their living conditions.

 

“The average Nigerian today has no hope, except the hope that comes from God,” he remarked.

El-Rufai Could Remain In Custody Till End Of Trial, As Judge Refuses Variation Tough Bail Conditions

0
Nasir El-Rufai
Nasir El-Rufai

By Suleiman Anyalewechi

 

Former Kaduna State Governor, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, will be filing a no-case-submission in his trial on alleged wire-tapping of the telephone lines of the National Security Adviser NSA.

 

The Department of State Service, DSS, is prosecuting El-Rufai  on a five-count charge bordering on alleged breach of national  security, and unlawful interception of communications system of the office of the NSA.

 

According to the originating summons, the DSS had alleged  that El-Rufai in February, 2026 while featuring in an interview session on Arise Television claimed to have Intercepted a telephone conversation involving the NSA, an offence the Service said is punishable under Section 12( 1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.

 

The prosecution at the resumed hearing on Tuesday June 23, 2026, informed that they will no longer be calling more witnesses, a development that led to the formal closure of their case.

 

Consequently, the defendant’s legal team led by Paul Erokoro  requested for a period of two weeks to enable them file a  no-case-submission.

 

According to Erokoro, the prosecution has failed to establish sufficient grounds to warrant El-Rufai filing a formal defence .

 

Similarly, the defence team filed an oral application demanding for a review of the bail conditions earlier granted the former Kaduna Governor, which they argued is too stringent, and difficult to meet.

 

Particularly, the defence team emphasized that the conditions requiring a Level 17 Civil Servant with properties in Maitama or Asokoro Districts of Abuja as one of the sureties, as well as an attestation letter from the Chairman of the Kaduna state Traditional Rulers Council are practically impossible in the present circumstances.

 

But while dismissing the bail application, presiding Judge Honourable Justice Joyce Abdul-Malik held that there are many instances of civil servants that own properties in the affected areas of Abuja.

 

Earlier, prosecution counsel Oluwole Aladedoye had opposed the bail variation application, contending that there are several property owners in Maitama,and Asokoro Districts who are civil  servants.

 

The former Kaduna state Governor is expected to file his no-case-submission on the next adjourned date of September 22,2026.

 

Not a few are of the conviction that El-Rufai going by the refusal of the presiding Judge to review the bail conditions,may be in custody till the conclusion of the case.

 

Observers strongly believe that it will be near impossible to secure an attestation letter from the Chairman of Kaduna state Traditional Rulers Council, His Highness, the Emir of Zazzau without attracting dire consequences from the Kaduna State Governor, Uba Sani.

 

Governor Sani and El-Rufai have been having frosty relationship of late a development which will not allow the Emir to play his role in perfecting the bail conditions.

Fallout Out Of Elections: APC Works On Low Turn Out Ahead 2027 Poll

0
APC

By Ayodele Oni 

 

Despite its victory in recent governorship election in Ekiti State and other bye elections to vacant national Assembly seats,the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is using templates from the exercises to determine level of preparedness for the next year’s general elections.

 

The elections saw APC leading, but number of votes scored compared with registered voters in those areas were apart.

 

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) conducted by-elections in six states. 

 

The APC won five of the contests, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) retained the Rivers South East Senatorial seat through its candidate, Olaka Nwogu.

 

In Ondo South, former President of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA), Prof. Dayo Faduyile, won the election with 68,474 votes, defeating the Allied People’s Movement (APM) candidate, Adeolu Akinwumi, who polled 1,411 votes.

 

Party sources revealed that the bye-elections, alongside the recent Ekiti governorship election and the forthcoming August 15 Osun governorship poll, are being treated by the APC as indicators of its readiness for the 2027 elections.

 

APC had boasted of scoring 500,000 votes in the June 20 poll but led others with a little well over 300,000 votes. The number of register voters in the state, according to INEC record stands at 988,923, while 720,724 collected their voters’ cards for the election.

 

A source at the party’s national secretariat in Abuja, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the leadership had begun a comprehensive review of the elections to identify strengths and areas requiring improvement.

 

According to the source, the Ondo South result attracted particular attention because of the low voter turnout, despite the district being the senatorial district of Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa and the APC facing no formidable opposition.

 

The source noted that fewer than 70,000 votes were cast by all parties, compared with the 2023 senatorial election in which the APC candidate, Jimoh Ibrahim, secured 110,665 votes while the PDP’s Agboola Ajayi polled 65,784 votes.

 

The source also compared the Ondo South figures with the Enugu North Senatorial by-election, where the APC scored 162,360 votes against the PDP’s 9,299

 

The source noted that fewer than 70,000 votes were cast by all parties, compared with the 2023 senatorial election in which the APC candidate, Jimoh Ibrahim, secured 110,665 votes while the PDP’s Agboola Ajayi polled 65,784 votes.

 

The source also compared the Ondo South figures with the Enugu North Senatorial by-election, where the APC scored 162,360 votes against the PDP’s 9,299.

 

He noted that although the APC lost the Enugu North seat in 2023, voter turnout in the recent by-election remained close to that of the previous general election.

 

“The party’s target is to surpass its 2023 presidential vote, particularly in the Southwest. 

 

Ondo gave President Bola Ahmed Tinubu the highest percentage of votes in the region in 2023. With the turnout recorded in the by-election, there are concerns about whether the party can improve on the 369,924 votes Tinubu secured in the state during the presidential election,” the source said.

 

Another APC chieftain in Ondo, who also requested anonymity, said the bye-election exposed cracks within the party. 

 

He accused Governor Aiyedatiwa of not doing enough to unite party stakeholders, alleging that comments by some of the governor’s loyalists about “retiring” some party leaders had alienated influential members.

 

He also cited the violence that marred the party’s congresses in Akure, saying some victims had yet to recover.

 

The source warned that the APC must close ranks ahead of 2027, especially now that the former Senator Nicholas Tofowomo is the Ondo South senatorial candidate for the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

 

But the APC Secretary in Ondo West Local Government, Comrade Omololu Abel, dismissed claims that the by-election signalled declining support for President Tinubu ahead of 2027.

 

In a statement posted on his Facebook page, Abel argued that comparing the by-election with the 2023 general election was misleading because the presidential and National Assembly elections held simultaneously in 2023 naturally produced higher voter turnout.

He added that fewer political parties contested the by-election, making direct comparisons statistically flawed, and stressed that off-cycle by-elections traditionally record lower participation and should not be used to gauge the APC’s electoral strength ahead of the next presidential election

Indigenes Accuse Fayose Of Denigrating Olubadan Throne, Setting Ibadan Sons, Daughters Against One Another

0
Ayodele Fayose
Ayodele Fayose

By Ayodele Oni

 

Ibadan Indigenes have risen in anger against former Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti state, accusing him of repaying the ancient city with evil, despite growing up and raising his businesses in the city.

 

Dragging the revered Monarch of the city into politics, the indigenes believe, is an affront and disrespect to the Olubadan throne and the people.

 

The mouth piece of the people, the Central Council of Ibadan Indigenes (CCII) has, therefore, again, warned the former Ekiti State Governor, to stop dragging the Olubadan of Ibadanland, Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja (Arusa I), into his political battles, and described his recent comments about the revered monarch as “highly provocative and unreasonable.”

 

In a statement issued by the CCII Publicity Secretary, Mr. Kola Olomide, the council urged Fayose to fight his political battles without involving the Olubadan in partisan disputes.

 

CCII recalled that it had earlier cautioned Fayose against dragging the Olubadan into his political fights, warning that repeated attempts to associate the monarch with partisan politics were unnecessary, disrespectful and capable of creating avoidable tension.

 

According to the statement, the CCII President-General, Chief Ajeniyi Ajewole, expressed disappointment over Fayose’s remarks during a recent appearance on ‘Politics Today’ on Channels Television.

 

During the interview with Seun Okinbaloye, Fayose accused Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, of dismantling his political structure in the South West chapter of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

 

“He took all my structures and did a lot that is not fair in party politics,” the former governor said.

Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja - Olubadan of Ibadanland
Oba Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja, Olubadan of Ibadanland

Fayose also claimed to enjoy the support of influential figures in Ibadan in his political battle with Makinde, saying:

 

 “The current Olubadan was a colleague. We are all working together, including the Olubadan, including all Makinde’s enemies.”

 

Reacting, Ajewole said Fayose had once again ignored the council’s earlier warning by attempting to drag the revered monarch into partisan politics.

 

“The comments credited to former Governor Ayodele Fayose are highly provocative and unreasonable.

 

“They are capable of creating a wrong impression about the revered Olubadan institution and unnecessarily heating up the political atmosphere.

 

“The Olubadan of Ibadanland is the father of all sons and daughters of Ibadan, irrespective of political affiliation.

 

“It is completely unacceptable for anyone to drag the revered monarch into political contests or create the impression that he belongs to any political camp.

 

“Former Governor Ayodele Fayose should fight his political battles alone and leave the Olubadan out of his politics.

 

“The Olubadan throne is sacred, highly revered and strictly non-partisan. No politician, no matter how highly placed, should use the throne to score political points or settle political scores,” he said.

 

Ajewole stressed that the Olubadan institution has earned widespread respect through its neutrality, fairness and unwavering commitment to peace, unity and stability in Ibadanland, warning that any attempt to politicise the throne could undermine its dignity and fuel unnecessary tension.

 

He also cautioned Fayose against making statements capable of disrupting the peace of the ancient city, insisting that the former governor can’t set Ibadan on fire through divisive comments and politically charged remarks.

 

“Ibadan is known for peace, wisdom and unity. No individual, regardless of political influence, can set Ibadan on fire through reckless political statements.

 

“We urge him to desist from inflammatory comments capable of creating unnecessary tension,” the President-General stated.

 

Ajewole further urged the former governor to uphold the cherished Omoluabi values for which the Yoruba people are renowned and to reflect the spirit of Ibadan’s hospitality, rather than denigrating the revered Olubadan throne.

 

“Fayose claimed that he was born, raised and started his business in Ibadan. Is this how he intends to repay the hospitality of the people of Ibadan—by denigrating the Olubadan throne, setting Ibadan sons and daughters against one another, and attempting to set the state on fire?” he queried.

 

Ajewole reaffirmed CCII’s commitment to defending the integrity, honour and non-partisan status of the Olubadan institution, insisting that the monarch must remain a symbol of unity for all sons and daughters of Ibadan, regardless of political differences.