Less than 48 hours after President Muhammadu Buhari announced that the Ban on Twitter, a Social Media Networking Platform, will be lifted if the demands and conditions put forward by the Federal Government are met, Human Rights Group, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP regards those conditions as impermissible.
SERAP demanded that President Buhari should, as a matter of urgency, withdraw the conditions imposed on Twitter pending the final determination of the suit at the Economic Council of West African States, ECOWAS, Court of Justice in Abuja.
The Group had sued the FG, challenging the legality of the suspension of Twitter, however, calling on the FG to allow the court to render a decision on the central issues in the case, and protect the plaintiffs’ rights and interests.”
President Buhari had during his national address on October 1st, Nigeria’s 61st Independence anniversary, given conditions for the ban on Twitter to be lifted. They include that concerns around national security are met, and that even when the suspension is lifted, Nigerians will only be allowed to use Twitter “for business and positive engagements.”
In this vein, in a statement and an open letter dated 2nd October 2021 and signed by SERAP Deputy Director Kolawole Oluwadare, the organization said: “The conditions imposed on Twitter while the ECOWAS case is pending constitute an interference with the right of SERAP and other plaintiffs to fairly and effectively pursue a judicial challenge to the decision by your government to suspend Twitter in Nigeria.
“The conditions make a mockery of the case pending before the ECOWAS court, and create a risk that the course of justice will be seriously impeded or prejudiced in this case. Protecting the right to a judicial recourse and due administration of justice is of utmost importance, being the cornerstone of an ordered society.”
According to SERAP: “Imposing impermissible conditions on Twitter would undermine the rights and interests of the Plaintiffs in the ECOWAS Court case filed against your government, as the conditions directly touch on the central issues of freedom of expression and access to information, which the court is set to determine and rule upon.”
The letter, read in part: “Pushing conditions on Twitter while the ECOWAS case is pending would prejudice the interests of the Plaintiffs, undermine the ability of ECOWAS court to do justice in the case, damage public confidence in the court, and prejudice the outcome of the case.
“It is in the public interest to keep the streams of justice clear and pure, and to maintain the authority of the ECOWAS court in the case. If not immediately withdrawn, the conditions would seriously undermine Nigeria’s international human rights obligations including under ECOWAS treaties and protocols, and have serious consequences for the public interest.”
“Given that the only way in which SERAP and other plaintiffs can have a fair and effective access to justice is to allow the court to decide on the merits of the case before it, fairness and justice must, on the facts of the ECOWAS case, outweigh any stated national security conditions.”
“Your government should allow the ECOWAS Court to decide these issues, especially as the Federal Government has made the arguments on national security before the court.”
“The core of the principle of judicial independence is the complete liberty of the judge to hear and decide the cases before them on the basis of facts and in accordance with the law, without any improper interference, direct or indirect.”
“The principle of the independence of the judiciary has also been enshrined in the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, endorsed by the General Assembly in 1985.”
“The principles provide, inter alia, that it is the duty of all governmental and other institutions to respect and observe the independence of the judiciary (principle 1); that judges shall decide matters before them impartially without any restrictions or interferences, direct or indirect, from any quarter or for any reason (principle 2); and that there shall not be any inappropriate or unwarranted interference with the judicial process (principle 4).”
“SERAP, therefore, urges you to urgently withdraw the conditions imposed on Twitter, and to allow the ECOWAS court to decide on the suit brought by SERAP and other plaintiffs challenging the legality of the suspension of Twitter in Nigeria. Judgment in the suit is fixed for 20 January, 2022.”
Discover more from The Source
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
