Even as it is coming so late in the day, I must commend Babangida for revealing (or finally confirming) the following self-evident truths in his epic Book – ‘A Journey in Service’:
First: That the 1966 coup was not an “Igbo coup” but somewhat of a revolution aimed at regime-change and installing Awolowo as the provisional president of Nigeria. In other words, if it could be said that the coup was tactically or covertly geared to foisting ethnic domination, it was going to be a Yoruba domination, not an Igbo domination. Still, whether Igbo domination or Yoruba domination, the counter coup was overtly geared to northern (or far-northern) domination and worse – it midwifed a horrid bloodlust and a total loss of compatriot spirit against the Igbo.
Second: That those who purveyed the destructive lie that it was an Igbo coup were motivated by a satanic desire to trigger an anti-Igbo ethnic tension on a national scale. In other words, a deliberate plot was hatched ahead of time to deploy the coup as a subterfuge to levy a genocide against Ndigbo.
Third: That Nzeogwu, having been borne and raised in Kaduna, not only spoke Hausa very fluently but was more Hausa than Igbo in his mannerisms, values, worldview and attitude. In other words, Nzeogwu was a confirmed ‘Aboki’, not an ‘Inyamiri’. No pun or disrespect intended.
Fourth: That the ranks of the coup plotters and henchmen were vastly populated by officers who were not Igbo. This was the most obvious clue that belied the lies but it never mattered anyway because the die was cast for the Igbo to ‘pay’.
Fifth: That an Igbo officer (Anuforo) assassinated another Igbo officer (Unegbe) who rallied against the coup; and another Igbo officer (Obienu) played a key role in halting the coup. But when Obienu was later to be hounded and murdered by northern soldiers, it didn’t matter to them that he put his life on the line to foil the ‘Igbo coup’. The only thing that mattered was that he was Igbo and therefore must die.
Sixth: That the palpable tension between Ojukwu and Gowon stemmed from Ojukwu’s altruistic insistence that the most senior officer (a Yoruba top brass named Babafemi Ogundipe) should, in accordance with time-honored military traditions, be the next Head of State after Ironsi’s gruesome assassination in the counter coup. So, as a matter of backward logical correlation, if the first coup was an Igbo coup – driven by the ambition for Igbo domination – why would Ojukwu (an alpha male and the ultimate Igbo man) take the great risk of insisting that a Yoruba man should be the next Head of State, following the second coup?
Seventh: That Ojukwu declared Biafra because Gowon proved unwilling to protect the beleaguered and trapped Igbos. In other words, Biafra was not an unlawful rebellion but a bulwark against a horrendous genocide or a last and resort to self preservation.
To conclude, I decided to write this piece for two main reasons:
Ibrahim Babangida – IBB
First, I hope it will bring some closure or comfort to all Igbos of my generation who have borne the burden of this destructive and hellish lie for over half a century. It is a burden we bear every day and night in blood and lost opportunities in a nation that was supposed to be equally ours but is not.
Second, I hope the new revelations will help to protect our children and their children from the visceral hate that has vested against the Igbo since this deadly lie of ‘Igbo coup’ was propagandized to a national “truth” that has haunted Ndigbo from generation to generations, such that all Igbo children borne into this country came out wearing the unbreakable yoke of this Igbo coup around their necks. I have such children and I suspect that they often wonder where their parents and ancestors went so wrong that should bring such undeserved ‘generational curse’ of being borne into a country that has seemingly drawn an invincible redline against them.
And this: For what it is worth, Ndigbo deserves a national contrition and political recompense from official Nigeria. This should include ceasing and desisting from the ongoing persecutions (fronted as prosecutions) of any Igbo that has risen or rises against the myriad anti-Igbo injustices that have characterized ‘political’ Nigeria, such as the disparities we have seen in State creations, location of seaports, the national budget, power-sharing, basic infrastructures, such as roads, rails and so on.
In the same vein, and again – for what it is worth, Ndigbo also deserve a deep-felt personal atonement from the prime actors who concocted this lie of Igbo coup and then dubiously turned around to use it as an anchor to launch a genocide (not a civil war) that nearly succeeded in wiping out the Igbo race if Biafra had not been declared. If they are not sure how to atone, they should borrow a leaf from Babaginda.
Hopefully, the contrition, recompense and atonement, if sincere, may just be the magic tunic that could persuade Ndigbo to pedal back from the strong temptation of seeking an alternative to Nigeria.
Ejimakor is an American trained Lawyer, and lead Counsel to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu
Following mixed reactions that greeted the increment in the Automated Teller Machine, ATM, transaction fees, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, SERAP, has filed a lawsuit against the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, “over the alleged failure to reverse its implementation.
SERAP said that the move is patently unlawful, unfair, unreasonable and unjust on Nigerians.
It would be recalled that the Apex Bank recently announced that ATM withdrawals made at a machine owned by a bank but outside its branch premises will now attract a charge of N100 per N20,000 withdrawn. ATM withdrawals at shopping centres, airports or standalone cash points, will incur a N100 fee plus a surcharge of up to N500 per N20,000 withdrawal.
In the suit number FHC/L/CS/344/2025 filed at the Federal High Court, Lagos, SERAP is asking the court to determine “whether the decision by the CBN to increase ATM transaction fees is not arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable, and contrary to the provisions of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018.”
SERAP is asking the court for “a declaration that the decision by the CBN to increase ATM transaction fees is arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of sections 1(c) and (d), 104, 105 and 127(1) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, which is binding on the CBN.”
SERAP is seeking “an order of interim injunction restraining the CBN, its officers, agents, associates or any other persons acting on its directive or instructions from enforcing and giving effect to the decision, pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for an order of interlocutory injunction filed in this suit.”
In the suit, SERAP is arguing that: “The increase cannot be justified under the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended], the CBN Act, Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, and the country’s international human rights obligations.”
SERAP is, also, arguing that, “The increase creates a two-tiered financial system that discriminates against poor Nigerians who may not be able to afford or pay the increased ATM fees.”
According to SERAP, “The patently unlawful, unfair, unreasonable and unjust increase in ATM transaction fees also inherently contributes to violations of the human rights of socially and economically Nigerians.”
The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its lawyers Kolawole Oluwadare and Andrew Nwankwo, read in part: “The CBN is compromising its stated mission to advance the management of the country’s economy, and ultimately, sustainable development.”
“The CBN is also failing to comply with the Nigerian Constitution, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act and the country’s international human rights obligations in the exercise of its statutory powers and functions.”
“The increase in ATM transaction fees ought to have been shouldered by wealthy banks and their shareholders, not the general public.”
CBN policies should not be skewed against poor Nigerians and heavily in favour of banks that continue to declare trillions of naira in profits mostly at the expense of their customers. The increase in ATM transaction fees would inflict misery on poor Nigerians and contribute to human rights abuses.”
“Imposing exorbitant ATM transaction fees on socially and economically vulnerable Nigerians at a time several Nigerian banks are declaring trillions of naira in profits yearly is manifestly unfair, unreasonable and unjust.”
“The CBN through a Circular to all banks and other financial institutions dated February 10 2025 stated that it has reviewed and increased the ATM transaction fees prescribed in section 10(7) of the CBN Guide to Charges by Bank, Other Financial and Non-Bank Financial Institutions 2020.”
“Section 1(c)(d) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2018 provides that the objectives of the Act are to ‘protect and promote the interests and welfare of consumers’ and ‘prohibit restrictive or unfair business practices’ such as the exorbitant and unreasonable increase in ATM transaction fees by the CBN.”
“The provisions of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act are directly binding on the CBN, as the provisions constrain the exercise of the statutory powers and functions of the institution.
“Section 2(1) of the Act provides that its provisions ‘apply to all undertakings [such as the CBN] and scope of application to all commercial activities within Nigeria.
“Section 2(2) provides that: ‘This Act is binding upon- (a) a body corporate or agency of the Government; (b) a body corporate; (c) all commercial activities aimed at making profit and geared towards the satisfaction of demand from the public.
“According to section 70(1) of the Act, ‘For the purpose of this Act, an undertaking [such as the CBN] is considered to be in a dominant position if it is able to act without taking account of the reaction of its customers or consumers.
“The Act prohibits abuse of dominant position by the CBN including charging excessive ATM transaction fees to the detriment of consumers.”
Section 104 of the of the Act asserts the supremacy of the Act over ‘the provisions of any other law’, such as the CBN Act. The only exception to the provision is the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended].”
“Section 127(1) of the Act also prohibits the CBN from making any policy or providing “any services at a price that is manifestly unfair, unreasonable or unjust.”
SERAP is therefore asking the court for the following reliefs:
A DECLARATION that the decision by the Defendant in upwardly reviewing and increasing ATM Transaction Fees, as contained in the Defendant’s circular dated 10th February 2025 is arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable, unjust and a dis-service to the consumers of the services rendered by Banks, Other Financial and Non-Bank Financial Institutions in Nigeria, and ultimately in breach of sections 1(c) and (d), 104, 105 and 127(1) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018.
A DECLARATION that by the combined provisions of section 1 (c) and (d), 104, 105 and 127 (1) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018, section 42(1) (a) of the Central Bank of Nigeria Act 2007 and section 10.7 of the Central Bank of Nigeria Guide to Charges by Banks, Other Financial and Non-Bank Financial Institution 2020, the Defendant cannot unilaterally increase ATM Transaction Fees without the consent of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC).
AN ORDER setting aside the Defendant’s circular dated 10th February 2025 and published on 11th February 2025, with reference number FPR/DIR/GEN/CIR/001/002, directed to all Banks and Other Financial Institutions for being arbitrary, unfair, unreasonable, unjust and a breach of the provisions of sections 1 (c) and (d), 104 and 127 (1) of the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act 2018.
AN ORDER restraining the Defendant, including its agents, assigns, privies and or representatives or such other persons acting on its behalf, and all Banks, Other Financial and Non-Bank Financial Institutions in Nigeria from implementing and/or enforcing the decision of the Defendant.
AND FOR SUCH FURTHER ORDER(S) that the Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance of this suit.
No date has been fixed for the hearing of the interim application and the substantive suit.
The Federal Government has been indicted by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFUND, for failing to grant Nigerian Universities absolute autonomy.
TETFUND has, therefore, called on the Federal Government to abolish its existing policy on Nigerian Universities and grant them complete autonomy.
Sonny Echono, Executive Secretary, made this appeal during the 9th Convocation ceremony of the Federal University, Oye-Ekiti, FUOYE.
Expressing his concern over Government’s control of Universities, despite the provisions of the Universities Autonomy Act №1 of 2007, which allows Universities to govern themselves and manage their finances, among other responsibilities.
He emphasized that the primary goal of the Act is to free universities from the bureaucratic constraints of the civil service, enabling University Governing Councils to exercise their powers and perform their functions without undue external influence or interference.
He also pointed out that Government’s interference, particularly, through the constitution and the dissolution of Governing Councils, has impeded Universities’ ability to establish independent appeal processes.
In his Convocation lecture titled “University Autonomy and the Challenge of Quality Tertiary Education in Nigeria,” Echono explained that autonomy would empower Universities to manage their academic curricula, staff welfare, and finances effectively.
Echono clarified that granting autonomy does not absolve the federal government of its responsibility to fund universities or imply the privatization of these institutions.
His words, “The existing Government policy on autonomy for Universities in Nigeria allows them to govern themselves, appoint key officers, determine staff conditions of service, control student admissions and academic curricula, manage their finances and generally operate as independent legal entities without undue interference from the federal government and its agencies.
“This policy is derived from the Universities (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Amendment) Act 2003, also known as the Universities Autonomy Act №1 of 2007.
“The Act, enacted by the National Assembly and signed into law on July 10, 2003, was later gazetted by the Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette №10, Volume 94 on January 12, 2007, as Act №1 of 2000.
“The overall goal of the Act is to liberate our universities from the civil service bureaucracy and enable university governing councils to exercise their powers without undue external influence.
“However, the government retains ultimate control over universities through constitutional provisions and the dissolution of governing councils. The President is the final arbiter in all appeal processes regarding federal institutions, and the government holds legislative power.
“Thus, it can be argued that autonomy under the Act is not absolute. For instance, despite the provisions for autonomy, Section 2AAA (2) mandates that a university council must ensure that the disbursement of university funds complies with the budgetary ratios approved by the government.
“While the Act is silent on the issue of internally generated revenue, it may imply that universities can freely disburse revenue generated from various sources without government interference. However, the government’s Treasury Single Account (TSA) policy requires all government agencies and institutions to pay their revenues into the TSA.
Resolving these inherent conflicts is crucial for restoring autonomy to our universities.
“It is important to note that university autonomy should not be interpreted as absolving the government of its responsibility to fund universities, nor does it imply the abdication or privatization of these institutions. The desirability of university autonomy encompasses three aspects: academic, administrative, and financial autonomy.”
Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke has directed the newly elected local government chairmen to stay away from local government council secretariats in order to avoid a breakdown of law and order in the state.
The All Progressives Congress, (APC) had directed former council officials reinstated by the Court of Appeal to resume on Monday.
Adeleke also charged the officials to work within the manifesto of the Peoples Democratic Party, (PDP), noting that his administration is transforming the state for the better.
The governor issued the directives while administering the oath of allegiance and oath of office on the 30 local government chairmen and vice-chairmen at the Osun State Government House on Sunday.
Addressing the newly sworn-in local government officials, Adeleke said the occasion is the culmination of what the people of the state have laboured to achieve.
He recalled the journey so far, adding that it is the final phase of a process which began a year ago
“I call on you to be agents of change, community developers or providers of the dividends of democracy. We will not fail you. People’s welfare will continue to be our watchword.
He appreciated Osun electoral commission and commended security agencies and state officials who made the exercise a success.
Adeleke also expressed appreciation to President Bola Tinubu for not allowing Osun State to descend into chaos.
“I assure Mr President of my commitment to the rule of law.”
Also addressing the newly sworn-in local government officials, Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, congratulated them and urged them not to forget the promise they made during the campaigns.
“This is an opportunity for you to deliver to the grassroots. This will be your stepping stone to higher positions and the reward for hardwork is more opportunities.”
Expressing surprise at the violence which broke out in the state on Monday, February 17, 2025, Makinde said he felt the need to come around to sound a warning in order to prevent a repeat of history.
“We don’t want ‘wild wild West’ again. They should stay away from this zone. We want to peacefully provide the dividend of democracy to the people.
“They should not resort to self help even if there is a court judgment. They should not think because they have federal might, this is a federal arrangement. I will stop here.”
Ondo State, Lucky Aiyedatiwa, has expressed deep gratitude to God for divine guidance and favour, as he prepares to officially assume office as the seventh elected Governor of the State.
Speaking during the thanksgiving service at the Redeemed Christian Church of God, Jesus House, Akure, on Sunday, the Governor acknowledged God’s role in shaping his political journey.
Governor Aiyedatiwa emphasized that his emergence as governor was not by human effort but by divine providence.
The Governor quoted Psalm 124:1, saying, “If it had not been the Lord who was on our side, what would our Israel be saying this day?”
He also expressed appreciation for the overwhelming support received from the people of Ondo State, especially during the last gubernatorial and local government elections.
“As we prepare to take the oath of office tomorrow, we pledge to serve with integrity, transparency, and accountability.
“We shall work tirelessly to create opportunities, foster growth, and ensure our state remains a beacon of hope and prosperity.”
The Governor reiterated his administration’s commitment to the Seven-Point Developmental Agenda (OUR EASE), which focuses on socioeconomic advancement in education, healthcare, agriculture, infrastructure, commerce, and industry.
Aiyedatiwa also assured the people of his resolve to maintain Ondo State’s status as one of the safest and most peaceful states in Nigeria.
Calling for unity and reconciliation, the Governor urged citizens to join hands in building a better future.
He also recognized the vital role of the church in societal development, pledging to strengthen partnerships that promote education, healthcare, and economic empowerment.
Earlier in his sermon titled “Appreciating God for His Favour,” Pastor Elijah Olujimi Olubade, the Regional Pastor of Zone 22, emphasized Psalm 44:1-8, which highlights that victories come not by human effort but by God’s grace.
He stated that just as Israel acknowledged God’s hand in their success, Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa is appreciating God for His favour to lead Ondo State.
Citing Romans 13:1, Pastor Olubade reminded the congregation that all authority is ordained by God. He urged leaders to govern with humility and gratitude, recognizing that their position is a divine assignment.
The event featured a thanksgiving session led by the Governor, joined by his wife, Esther Oluwaseun Aiyedatiwa and the immediate family, the Deputy Governor and his family, as well as top government officials.
“People we thought of as brothers have really let the family down. Mummy and Daddy trusted them implicitly, but we’ve come to see that they were not to be believed”
By Adesina Soyooye
While Nigerians watch in shock as the family of Herbert Wigwe, until his tragic death, the Group Chief Executive Officer of Access Holdings Plc, inexplicably struggle over his huge assets, seemingly, with his biological children, headed by first child, Toochi Wigwe, 26 years, late Herbert’s sister, Joyce, has lamented the family’s alleged abandonment by their brother’s friends all of whom they had thought to be family.
Herbert, his wife, Doreen, their first son, Chizzy, and a friend of theirs, Abimbola Ogunbanjo, former Group Chairman, Nigerian Exchange Group Plc, perished in a fatal helicopter crash in Nevada, United States of America, barely a year ago.
Since that crash which shook Nigeria’s corporate world, drew rivers of tears, and broke hearts, nothing seem to be the same within the Wigwe family.
According to reports which not a few Nigerians have described as scandalous and shameful, a couple of Herbert’s siblings, and the patriarch of the family, Pastor Shingle Wigwe, are in a squabble with Herbert’s children and a couple of his trusted friends to whom he handed over his estate to administer, and guide his children.
They ended up in Court. Herbert’s siblings and his father sued his daughter, Toochi and among others, his very trusted friend, Agboje Aig Imoukhuede. They failed, but have now appealed against Toochi and co.
If anybody was in doubt of how scandalous and messy this family fight has become, the untidy incident which took place at the first memorial anniversary of Herbert, his wife and son banished all that. There was physical fracas, to the extent that one of the Wigwe’s, Emeka, was dragged out of the venue and arrested thereafter.
Speaking on the pains of the family and what she terms a betrayal by his late brother’s friends, his sister, Joyce Wigwe, lamented that their father and mother fell ill out of shock over the, alleged betrayal. She said the family has been let down.
She lamented, without mentioning specific names:
“People we thought of as brothers have really let the family down.
“Daddy and Mommy trusted them implicitly, but we’ve come to see that they were not what we believed them to be.
“Because of this, Daddy actually fell ill. We, almost, lost him. Mommy also broke down because of the trust they had placed in them.
“This has made the journey incredibly difficult and heart-wrenching for them.”
On the ugly incident which happened in the village and resulted in the arrest of her sibling, Emeka, Joyce recounted how his late brother’s friends came to the village without the courtesy of paying respects to the Wigwe’s family home to see their old parents.
“They didn’t even come to see us. Worse still, they wouldn’t let us through the gates.
“Ny brother, Emeka, was physically assaulted during the encounter.
“They muzzled my brother, treated him terribly, and even threw him to the ground. The car almost ran over him three times. They tried to hit him with their car”
” Emeka, out of frustration, eventually retaliated, and a photo capturing that moment was later used against him.
“When he managed to break free and defend himself, he threw a blow—and that was the moment they captured in a picture.”
According to her, Emeka was later arrested at night, accused of fighting with operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS).
“But nobody took pictures of when he was almost crushed by cars three times.”
Joyce was, also not comfortable with the heavy security presence at the memorial. What was the motive?, she wondered.
“Herbert’s daughter was accompanied by armed personnel in no less than ten cars. You begin to wonder—did they really come to pay respects, or was it something else?”
She revealed that their mother, devoted herself to Herbert’s well-being from childhood, and was now, very heartbroken.
“This was the child who had the most health problems growing up. She cared for him and devoted herself to him. And yet, this same child was the one who stood up, put them on the map, and gave them a life they could never have dreamed of.”
Joyce revealed the absence of support from those they once thought were close to them.
“If the friends and family we thought we had stood by us, my parents would have been comforted. But they haven’t been comforted at all.”
Herbert, wife and son perished on February 9, 2024.
The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) tackled former military leader Ibrahim Babangida (IBB) for heaping all the blames as regard the annulment of the 1993 June 12 Presidential Election on late Head of State, General Sani Abacha.
MURIC said in a statement that Babangida, on February 20, did not only insult Nigerians, but added salt to Injury by writing and presenting his autobiography which content it dismissed as provocative and its presentation a show of Impunity.
As Nigeria’s Military President at the time, Babangida presided over the Presidential Election adjudged to be free and fair, and presumed to have been won by Business Mogul, Chief Moshood Abiola, popular as MKO. However, just when the announcement of the winner was being expected, IBB’s regime annulled the election.
IBB never recovered from the crisis that followed it, as he was forced to cobble together an Interim National Government headed by late Chief Ernest Shonekan, while he stepped aside on August 15, 1993.
But the ING which he set up was thrown out by General Sani Abacha, then Chief of Defence Staff, who went ahead and installed himself as the Head of State.
Thereafter, Abiola was arrested by Abacha, thrown into detention, dragged to Court, accused of treasonable felony among others, for declaring himself President. He did not come out of the detention alive. He died in custody.
While speculations have been the fate of that election and the intrigues that surrounded it, on February 20, 2025, the man at the centre, IBB, told his story in his autobiography, “A Journey In Service”, which he presented that day.
Aside from confirming, after 32 years, that Abiola won the election, IBB, let it be known that it was General Abacha who cancelled the Election because of (1): Abacha was against a Civilian Government (2) Abacha had a deep rooted hatred for Abiola. He, also, revealed that the annulment was announced in his absence by the Media Aide to his Chief of General Staff, Admiral Augustus Aikhomu.
Even though he took responsibility, he, literally, washed his hands off and heaped the blame on Abacha. He literally said that he tagged along because because he feared for his life and that of Abiola as Abacha and Co were planning a violent coup against him, and would have killed Abiola as well.
But his story has not gone down well with not a few people. While some, including Abacha’s daughter, Gumsu, have dismissed him as a coward, others say he should tell his story to the marines.
Enraged over his claim that Abacha was the problem, MURIC in a statement signed by its Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, pinpointed him as the problem, not Abacha.
The statement reads:
“We of the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) hereby totally reject all attempts by the former military dictator to exonerate himself from the annulment of the June 12, 1993 election fiasco. The former dictator should stop blaming others for all that happened. We assert emphatically, unequivocally and categorically that the buck stops at IBB’s table. We reject his alibi.
“We hold IBB responsible for the failure of Nigeria to cultivate a sustainable, visionary and dignifying political culture having annulled the fairest, freest and most peaceful election in the history of Nigeria.
“Thursday, 20th February, 2025, the day IBB presented his memoir, was a sad day for genuinely patriotic Nigerians. It was the day leaders decided to disappoint the masses by hero-worshipping a former dictator, a tyrant and a numero uno enemy of democracy.
“Nigeria was at the edge of the cliff when the duo of Buhari and Idiagbon came to rescue the nation from general indiscipline, corruption and avaricious greed. We were getting it right when IBB came from nowhere to topple that corrective administration. That was the beginning of our descent back to the abyss of pitch darkness.
“IBB incarcerated Buhari and refused to allow him to attend his mother’s funeral. The lives of many innocent Nigerians were wasted during the IBB-Abacha totalitarian military misadventure. Clement Akpangbo, Bagauda Kaltho, Justice Ikpeme, Alfred Rewane, etc. were sent to the beyond. The streets of Lagos and Ibadan were filled with dead bodies.
“Yet the height of heartlessness and callousness was the assassination of the winner of that monumental election, Chief Moshood Kashimawo Abiola (MKO) and the killing of his wife, Alhaja Kudirat Abiola.”
MURIC said it was outraged by the “public show of spite, chagrin and insensitivity at the Transcorp Hilton, venue of IBB’s book presentation”.
It described it as “audacious, outrageous, nauseating and provocative.
“Salt was added to injury. IBB is not sober.
“Our leaders have failed to learn the art of healing. They do not understand the people they are leading. We are separated by a wide gulf. Arrogance and impunity are cancerous tumors which eat deep into the anatomy of love, unity, tolerance and forgiveness.
“This country has not been fully healed from the excruciating pains of June 12 and the criminal and cold-blooded killings of our first prime minister, Alhaji Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Alhaji Ahmadu Bello, the Sardauna of Sokoto and Chief S. L. Akintola former premier of the Western Region. Unfortunately, all those killings were done by the Nigerian military.
“For the temerity manifested by IBB in displaying the original results of the June 12 election 32 years later and for publicly admitting that MKO won the historic election, the author of ‘A Journey In Service’ has certified Nigeria as the land where conscienceless power subjugates powerless conscience.
“This book is the height of impunity and the author is judicable. IBB has not demonstrated remorse. His book is indubitable exercise in the territory of high-level treason.
“As an Islamic human rights organization, MURIC is greatly disturbed by the fact that the major dramatis personae in the annulment of the June 12 election are Muslims: MKO, IBB, Abacha, etc. We regret that the principle of justice which Islam holds in high esteem have been bastardised by those who should know better.
“We give posthumous salutes to true heroes of democracy like Chief MKO Abiola, Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, Dr. Beko Ransome Kuti and Chief Alfred Rewane. We doff our hats to living heroes of the struggle like Professor Wole Soyinka, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, current governor of Kaduna State, Uba Sani, Professor Sylvester Odion Akhaine, erstwhile secretary of the Campaign for Democracy (CD), the arrowhead of the struggle against military rule, Shehu Sani, Comrade Okechukwu Ndiribe and leaders of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO).”
The Jigawa State Police Command, on Sunday, February 23, 2025, urged commercial motorists and other road users to prioritize safety measures in their operations.
The Police cautionary note came on the heels of the death of four passengers in a ghastly road mishap on Saturday February 22.
About 10 others were also said to have sustained varying degrees of injuries when a commercial bus suddenly burst into flames at about 4:00 pm, close to the Gwaram Government Girls Unity College In Gwaram Local Government Area of Jigawa State.
The fully loaded bus was heading from Zaki Local Council of Bauchi State to Rabadi Community in Gwaram when the incident occurred.
A statement from Lawan Adam,SP, the Jigawa Police Command Spokesperson on Sunday informed that about 25 adults ,and 19 children were on board the ill-fated commercial bus.
He noted that the cause of the sudden fire outbreak was traced to the exhaust pipe of the bus with the flames spreading fast through a mattress tied close to the pipe.
“The victims were identified as Zuwairah Hassan 40, Fatima Hassan 5, Iyatale Hassan, 3, and Halima Muhammad 10- all from Saldiga village in Zaki LGA ,Bauchi State.
The four victims were completely burnt ,while 10 others were seriously affected.
According to the Police, while the rest of the passengers were evacuated, the injured were taken to Gwaram Cottage Hospital for medical attention.
Adam further stated that the remains of the dead ,were handed over to their relations .
The statement appealed to commercial vehicle operators to always pay attention to some safety measures and always examine the state of their vehicles to avert avoidable road accidents.
The unfolding events in Osun State offer a comprehensive case study in overcoming institutional inertia and political manipulation through visionary leadership. Governor Adeleke’s blend of American-influenced expertise and a deep commitment to democratic principles has not only secured a peaceful election but has also set a new standard for governance in Nigeria. His resolute stand against outdated practices, coupled with a pragmatic embrace of innovative security measures like Amotekun, has ensured that the democratic process remains intact.
Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke’s American education, bolstered by a degree in criminal justice and decades of experience living in the United States, has provided him with a profound understanding of democratic principles and modern law enforcement techniques. This global perspective has enabled him to challenge entrenched practices and reimagine governance in a system often mired in outdated legal and political maneuvers. His innovative approach stands as a testament to the benefits of international training in navigating the complexities of Nigeria’s legal and political landscape.
Challenging Security Paradigms and Embracing Alternative Law Enforcement
In the run-up to the local government elections, traditional security forces resorted to familiar scare tactics. The Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun not only advised against holding the elections but also threatened to withdraw security by predicting inevitable chaos—hoodlums and violent criminals being a familiar refrain in Nigeria’s political playbook. Despite credible intelligence warning of potential violence, as repeatedly highlighted by Force Public Relations Officer Olumuyiwa Adejobi and echoed by the Nigeria Police Force, Governor Adeleke’s resolve did not falter. Instead, he decisively insisted that the elections must proceed and pivoted towards modern solutions by embracing Amotekun, an alternative regional security outfit that the police and other political powers had long fought to suppress.
Resistance to Amotekun and the Politics of State Police
The emergence of Amotekun was not a spontaneous development but the result of deliberate efforts by security forces and political elites to prevent the existence of a state-controlled police force. For years, the established powers, including the Inspector General of Police and other influential political figures, resisted the formation of such a force because it threatened their traditional monopoly over law enforcement. Now, as Amotekun temporarily filled the role of state police—delivering innovative and effective security—it has become evident why these powers were so determined to block its existence. Their reluctance to accept a system where security is decentralized and more responsive to local needs underscores a broader resistance to reform in Nigeria’s security architecture.
Election Dynamics, Judicial Interference, and a Resounding Victory
Amid mounting tension and conflicting directives, the elections in Osun State unfolded with surprising calm. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) secured a historic victory by winning all the chairmanship and councillorship seats in all 30 local government areas—a sweeping result confirmed by Hashim Abioye, Chairman of the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission, who announced that the PDP had also cleared all 332 councillorship seats. Meanwhile, the judiciary—known for its shameful, conflicting orders emanating from state, federal, and appellate courts—played its customary part. Amidst the legal wrangling and multiple court directives, Governor Adeleke remained resolute, recognizing that federal courts have no jurisdiction over local elections. This judicial chaos, rather than disrupting the process, further underscored the resilience of a system determined to uphold democratic values.
Psychological Warfare and Political Rivalries:
Beyond the realm of physical security, senior figures—including the Inspector General of Police—deployed psychological tactics to instill fear and uncertainty among the electorate. This recurring strategy, often used by the police to deter protests and elections by warning of imminent threats from hoodlums and violent actors, is a familiar game to many Nigerians. Governor Adeleke, well-versed in navigating such dynamics, demonstrated that these manufactured security concerns would not derail the democratic process. Although these maneuvers were designed to exploit deep-seated insecurities and halt the progression of democracy, they ultimately failed to shake public confidence. The situation was further complicated by the involvement of Bola Tinubu—Nigeria’s President with deep-rooted connections to Osun State and clear aspirations to extend APC influence—standing in stark contrast to Governor Adeleke’s unwavering loyalty to the PDP. This difference has laid bare the extreme lengths to which established powers will go to maintain their grip on both security and political control.
Defying the AGF:
Osun’s Commitment to Democracy
Osun Governor Ademola Adeleke defied the directive of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Lateef Fagbemi, to halt local council elections, demonstrating that his commitment to democracy outweighed political maneuvering. Despite legal developments that reinstated removed local officials until October 2025 and warnings about potential constitutional issues, Governor Adeleke remained determined to advance local development and ensure genuine democratic participation in Osun State. In the end, the elections proceeded successfully and resulted in a comprehensive victory, bringing a welcome resolution to the longstanding debates over governance.
Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi
Defiant Messaging and the Role of Amotekun
In a powerful repudiation of outdated tactics, Governor Adeleke’s nephew, Davido—a renowned Nigerian musician trained in an American college—captured the public’s imagination with his defiant tweet, “We go use Amotekun.” This bold declaration not only challenged the Nigeria Police Force’s warnings but also signaled a clear intent to rely on innovative security solutions if traditional methods failed. Davido’s message, which drew mixed reactions online, epitomized a new era of political communication that leverages modern ideas to counteract the old legal, police, and political games. His statement, along with Governor Adeleke’s own insistence, resonated deeply as a rejection of practices that toy with the minds of American-educated leaders in today’s global age.
International Engagement and Critique of Illegality
During a period of intense political turbulence, while British diplomats led by Deputy High Commissioner Jonny Baxter were visiting Osogbo, Governor Adeleke seized the opportunity to expose the inherent illegality and moral bankruptcy of Nigeria’s traditional political machinations. In a pointed exchange, he criticized Inspector General Kayode Egbetokun for colluding with the APC to enforce a non-existent court order—a move he condemned as a “rape on democracy.” His remarks not only spotlighted the perverse tactics employed by security agents and political elites but also underscored the broader issue of outdated legal and security games that have no place in today’s global environment. As I paraphrase the governor, his message was clear: don’t play with American minds—those who engage in such manipulative tactics are meddling with principles shaped by modern democratic ideals, and their archaic methods are failing, as the resounding electoral victory decisively proves.
A Call for Modern Governance and Democratic Integrity
Governor Adeleke’s steadfast commitment to modernizing governance and ensuring the integrity of the democratic process stands as a beacon for future leadership in Nigeria. His approach rejects the manipulative tactics of old—practices that were designed to prevent the emergence of a state-controlled police force like Amotekun. Now, as Amotekun temporarily fills the crucial role of state police, it becomes clear that established powers have long resisted any move towards decentralized, responsive security. This refusal to embrace reform is a major reason why traditional political and security establishments are increasingly out of step with the demands of a modern democracy. The unequivocal electoral victory—where the PDP swept every local seat—demonstrates that when contemporary strategies are embraced, democracy not only endures but thrives.
A Blueprint for the Future
The unfolding events in Osun State offer a comprehensive case study in overcoming institutional inertia and political manipulation through visionary leadership. Governor Adeleke’s blend of American-influenced expertise and a deep commitment to democratic principles has not only secured a peaceful election but has also set a new standard for governance in Nigeria. His resolute stand against outdated practices, coupled with a pragmatic embrace of innovative security measures like Amotekun, has ensured that the democratic process remains intact. This historic win by the PDP—marked by a clean sweep across all 30 local government areas—serves as a resounding testament to the power of modern governance in an era where traditional games are rapidly losing their grip on the future.
Judicial and Security Neutrality:
In an era marked by intense political rivalry, courts and police must avoid becoming entangled in partisan disputes. When these institutions allow themselves to be drawn into interpolitical matters, they risk being exploited as mere tools in the power struggle—an involvement that can lead to both local and international disgrace. Maintaining strict neutrality is essential for safeguarding the integrity of justice and security, as well as for preserving public trust. By steering clear of political entanglements, these bodies can ensure that their core mission remains intact and free from the corrupting influence of external pressures and partisan manipulation. Let us paraphrase Governor Adeleke here, recently remarking with a touch of humor, “Be careful, or your actions might have you joining the ranks of those ‘who rape democracy’; we all know how it goes—just ask those not eligible for Canadian visas due to questionable behavior!” His pointed comment serves as a sharp warning against meddling in political games.
International Humor and Warnings:
During discussions with British diplomats, Governor Adeleke did not miss the chance to inject a wry observation into the discourse. He humorously cautioned that those who continue to employ outdated, manipulative tactics might soon find themselves as unwelcome as a Canadian denied a visa—a fate reminiscent of recent high-profile cases involving Nigerian security figures. In his own words, he warned that such practices could earn them a global reputation as the very ones who “rape democracy.” This ironic remark underscores the futility of interpolitical meddling by courts and police, reminding us that in today’s interconnected world, archaic power games can lead to international ridicule and lasting disgrace.
Ultimately, for Nigeria to truly embrace democracy, its institutions must evolve beyond mere rhetoric and symbolic gestures. Courts and security agencies need to remain neutral and free from partisan influence to preserve the integrity of the democratic process. As Governor Adeleke’s pointed remarks and the overwhelming electoral mandate suggest, the time has come for Nigeria to become democratic not just in name, but in every facet of governance. Only by shedding outdated legal, police, and political games can the nation earn genuine respect on the global stage and build a future where democracy is lived, not merely proclaimed.
This psychologist has no personal or other affiliations with Governor Adeleke or any political figures mentioned herein. The sole motivation is a sincere desire to see Nigeria fully embrace and live the principles of true democracy.
Oshodi Open Door, also known as Oshodi Open Door Public Training (OOPDT, pronounced opidt), is a public awareness initiative promoting transparency, accountability, and integrity in Africa through educational articles and resources at [email protected], and offers specialized Timely Response Solutions (TRS) training at minimal or no cost.
Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi is an American psychologist, educator, author specializing in forensic clinical psychology, cross-cultural psychology, police prison science, social justice. Born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, he is the son of a 37-year veteran of the Nigeria Police Force, a background that shaped his commitment to justice, security, psychological research.
A pioneer in forensic psychology, he introduced state-of-the-art forensic psychology to Nigeria in 2011 through the National Universities Commission (NUC) Nasarawa State University, where he served as an Associate Professor in the Department of Psychology. His contributions extend beyond academia into psychological health behavioral change initiatives through the Oshodi Foundation the Center for Psychological Forensic Services.
Professor Oshodi has held faculty positions at Florida Memorial University, Florida International University, Broward College, Nova Southeastern University, Lynn University. He is also a contributing faculty member in the doctoral undergraduate psychology programs at Walden University serves as a virtual professor with Weldios University and Iscom University.
Beyond academia, he is a government consultant for forensic-clinical psychological services in the USA previously served as Interim Associate Dean Assistant Professor at Broward College, Florida.
He has published extensively on mental health, justice, institutional reform is the founder of the Psychoafricalysis theory, which integrates African sociocultural perspectives into psychology.
Professor Oshodi remains an influential force in advancing psychology institutional reform globally, particularly in Africa
PDP wins in all Councils, winners may be sworn-in today
Even as the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, won all the seats in the February 22, Osun State Local Council Election, the All Progressives Congress, (APC) in the state has called on the Local Government Chairmen and Councilors returned to office to continue with their work.
Citing a still seeming controversial Court of Appeal ruling which reinstated them in office, the APC forcefully took over the Local Government Headquarters, and pushed out the interim officers of the PDP. Insisting that their tenure would end in October, 2025, the APC, also, opted out of the Saturday Election.
However, with the results declared, PDP Governor Ademola Adeleke has vowed o swear in the Chairmen and Councilors elected during the Saturday election on Sunday to enable them resume on Monday.
But a statement by the APC Publicity Secretary in the state, Kola Olabisi, stated that the reinstated Chairmen and Councilors remain the elected officials to run the Local Government affairs in the State.
This, not a few people fear, has set tye tone for a possible clash between members of both parties which could degenerate into a full blown crisis.
Said the APC Publicity Secretary in a statement: “We want to make it abundantly clear that it is imperative for the elected APC Local Government Chairmen and Councilors not to cease from resumption at their various Local Government Council Areas in order to continue to serve the deprived people at the grassroots level of Government.
“The APC is a party founded on the rule of law which is the reason the Court of Appeal judgement given at the Akure Division, Akure, Ondo State, on the 10th of February, 2025, is the basic instrument of your reinstatement.
“We are not unaware of the fact that some disgruntled elements who are emboldened by the lawless government of the day in Osun State are planning to invade the Local Government Council Areas across the State.
“We would like to enjoin the state Commissioner of Police, the State Director of the DSS and the State Comptroller of the Civil Defence to be on watch out with a view to keeping peace in all the Local Government Council Areas in the State.
“It is also important to appeal to parents and guardians across the State to warn their children and wards to desist from being recruited as political thugs by disgruntled and failed politicians who are hell-bent in disturbing the peace of the State.
“We are reinstating our statement again that there are no vacancies for elected offices at the Local Government Council level in all the Local Government Council Areas in Osun State.”
Earlier, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister for Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, had asked Governor Adeleke not to go ahead with the election, citing the Court of Appeal judgement. Also, the Inspector General of Police, Dr. Kayode Egbetokun, expressed same sentiment. But the very determined Governor called their bluff.
In the Saturday election, the Police abstained from their duty. Instead, they sealed the Headquarters of the Osun State Independent Electoral Commission, and allegedly, brutalized and arrested a number of Staff.
However, the election which Governor Adeleke said over 60 percent of registered voters participated in, went on peacefully. After he voted, Adeleke hailed President Bola Tinubu as a true democrat who would always respect the rule of law.
