Home Blog Page 2628

OPINION: Sheikh Gumi And His Bandits | The Source

0

By Lasisi Olagunju

Respected Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Abubakar Gumi, has lately been mounting campaigns for amnesty for murderous bandits. He has also been meeting with them in their forested hideouts. This past weekend, the Sheikh went beyond the bandits; he looked south and labeled Yoruba and Igbo youths demanding security, equity, restructuring and true federalism as secessionists who are no better than Boko Haram. The cleric grouped those southern activists with the Boko Haram while bandits, to him, were “insurgents” with “genuine concerns and grievances.” Gumi told BBC pidgin that southern people protesting marginalization are miscreants who “are all the same group of people with Boko Haram.” He submitted that “Yoruba leaders and Igbo leaders should take care of their miscreants as we are handling herdsmen and Boko Haram which are miscreants in the north.”

The credentials of the man who said the above interests me. This Sheikh Gumi is not your run-of-the-mill Northern Nigeria preacher. He is a well-prepared man built on solid education. He was at the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, to read medicine. He was at the Nigeria Defence Academy (NDA), Kaduna; he left the army as a Captain. He was at the Umm al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia where he studied Islamic Jurisprudence. His records say he is an ethnic Hausa. I have followed his latest interventions in the insecurity wracking the north west. The offerings he is giving the nation worries me – considering the stature of his credentials.

He is tasking Nigerians – the victims – to “embrace peace” and allow the bandits “to have a share of the national cake.” Murderous bandits are the focus of the Sheikh. I have not heard his word for the victims.

In the closing months of 2018, my primary school teacher lost his police-officer son in a Zamfara forest. The officer from Osun State was drafted to the north-western state as part of a police squadron battling banditry there. I was with my teacher in January 2019. It was supposed to be a happy reunion of teacher and pupil but it was a condolence visit. “The bandits of Zamfara shot him in the head,” he told me, pointing at the right side of the head. “We buried him in his new house over there. He didn’t sleep a day in that house.” Police authorities gave the parents a hundred thousand naira, the old couple said they added a hundred thousand more to bring the corpse of their son home for burial. My teacher spoke as if he wanted to say more but the sorrow of a father choked the words from coming out. I changed the topic. The old man did not survive the trauma; we lost him a few months later. As I looked at the bandits turning out in full regalia, meeting Sheikh Gumi last week, my mind’s eyes scanned the faces in search of the murderers of my teacher’s son. My teacher sweated and struggled to educate and train his son to a responsible, useful adult but that son was shot by children of those who did not see any need to educate their own.

The Chinese are very wise people. Their ancestors taught them how to dominate the world using the values of corn, trees and knowledge in proverbial terms. When planning for a year, they were told to plant corn; when planning for a decade, they were taught to plant trees; when planning for life, educate the people was the counsel. There is no society that followed the above advice that has failed to conquer the world around it. Again, every people in history who chose ‘corn’ and scorned education has ended up as a curse to its era. Northern Nigeria is a super spreader of sorrow and tears across the country. I have just told you of my old teacher’s share of what the north does daily. There are millions of others grieving silently in their homes in the north, in the south. I remembered my teacher and his slain son when I saw the bandits of Zamfara in their full regalia of death as they met Sheikh Gumi. If you didn’t notice what I saw, go look at the photographs again; look at their dress, their blood-stained palms and teeth, their guns and their RPG bullets. Whoever chose the venue of that meeting was poetic in rebellious sarcasm. The Sheikh met with them in a decapitated classroom – it has no roof – the sky is the roof; there is a doorway with the frames savagely torn off; the walls have equally suffered violence from either the elements or from the bandits themselves. But for the inscription “ZSUBEB/UBEC 2nd quarter project, 2006,” on the wall, the structure would have passed for any of the savage buildings in war-destroyed Syria.

Gumi was heard asking us to start calling them ‘insurgents’ and not ‘bandits.’ I found that quite funny and insulting. These are common felons without any mission outside money, and no vision beyond their cows. Why should we stop calling them bandits? A bandit is an outlaw operating with his likes in a lawless area. An insurgent is a person fighting against a government, a member of an invading force. That is what the dictionary says. So, which of those words aptly captures the murderers and kidnappers of the north west? When did they claim to be fighting the government? At least, we know the poor people they kill or kidnap for ransom have no relationship with government. Gumi must not be allowed to clothe them with the patriotic, nationalist fervor of the Mau Mau of Kenya. Gumi said they had “legitimate concerns and grievances.” What concern or grievance drives people who kidnap for ransom? Our respected cleric also compared them with Niger Delta agitators, people who protested against the exploitation of their oil-bearing communities by the Nigerian state. Hear him: “Since the Niger Delta militants were integrated by the Federal Government and are even in the business of pipelines protection, the Federal Government should immediately look into how something like that will be done to the Fulani to provide them with reasonable means of livelihood including jobs, working capitals, entrepreneurship training, building clinic and schooling.” Sad submission. Why is justice afraid of going for the Fulani bandits? Did Niger Delta militants turn their guns against their own people? The Okahs of MEND, accused of bombing Abuja on October 1, 2010, were they not promptly arrested and taken to justice? Why would a well-schooled somebody like Sheikh Gumi choose that dubious line, singing joy in front of death?

What do armed robbers do that the bandits of the north west don’t do? The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) did an insightful report on these bandits in July last year. I recommend it to Sheikh Gumi and all like him who see the bandits of Katsina, Zamfara, Sokoto and Kaduna as freedom fighters. The report was on what the BBC described as “Motorcycle-riding armed bandits operating out of abandoned forest reserves” who  “are ransacking communities in Nigeria’s north-west.” While saying that the groups were the latest to join “Nigeria’s lucrative kidnap-for-ransom industry,” the BBC noted that the bandits “are quite brazen in their operations,” citing two separate occasions when they targeted villagers who had received food handouts from the government during the coronavirus lockdown. “They were about 200 on motorbikes, each bike rider carried a passenger and they all carried AK-47 guns,” Bashir Kadisau, an eyewitness, told the BBC. He said he climbed to the top of a tree when he saw the large number of motorcycle riders coming into Kadisau village, and saw the attackers loot shops, steal cattle and grain, and shoot people who were fleeing. The herders are mostly nomadic and can be found on major highways and streets across the country herding their cattle…The report identified the bandits as armed groups within Fulani communities. Significantly the BBC quoted a security analyst as saying that “the herders now see kidnapping and pillaging as more lucrative than the herding. The biggest cow would go for 200,000 naira but one kidnapping would fetch millions. This report should be enough light on the mission of the felons. Now, let me ask the Sheikh if he is still saying the bandits he met with in that forest have “genuine concerns and grievances”?

It is a misfortune to share same space with strange people whose entire lives are built on strange ideas. I also heard Sheikh Gumi declaring that what the bandits needed was education. But is it not too late for these wild men already? How do you train people who grew up sipping blood to be well and responsible again? The time to mould people who chose to be bandits and who profit from banditry is past. Those ones we saw with Gumi wrapped up in taliban turbans with unimaginable weapons of death are too far gone. They cannot be saved. What we need to work on is how to be safe from them and from the violence that will come tomorrow from their descendants.

The solution for today is a firm, responsible government that is willing to give them what they deserve which is justice. The solution for tomorrow is education in the right measure for the kids of the north. We were taught very early in life that work is the antidote to poverty (Ise l’ogun ise). We were also told that education is the only stairway to greatness (eko nii so nii d’oga). J.F. Odunjo, in the old Alawiye series, warns the children of Yorubaland to run away from those mocking education. He tells us that education makes one the boss. He adds strongly that we must acquire it very well. He goes on: Bi o si ri opo eniyan (And if you see a multitude of people); Ti won nfi eko s’erin rin (who are mocking education with laughter); dakun ma f’ara we won (please do not keep their company); Iya n’bo f’omo ti ko gbon (suffering will soon come for the unwise child); Ekun n’be f’omo to nsa kiiri (wailings and tears are for the truant child); Ma f’owuro sere ore mi (do not play with your early years, my friend); Mura si ise, ojo nlo (work hard, time waits for no one).” That was the philosophical foundation that framed every Yoruba child of my generation. We went to school but our neighbours far north mocked (and still mock) education. Now, because of them, our schooling and all we acquired are almost useless. Worse is, we can no longer sleep. And their leaders say we are not allowed to call them criminals.


Olagunju writes for the Nigeria Tribune

2023: Governor Makinde May Dump PDP For ADC |The Source

0
Governor Seyi Makinde

By Akinwale Kasali

There are speculations that Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State may soon dump the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, for African Democratic Congress, ADC, due to some executive issues.

For months now, Governor Makinde have been having issues within the Oyo State PDP and the South-West PDP, especially, former Ekiti State Governor, Ayo Fayose.

The rift between both PDP Political gladiators  over the leadership of the party in the zone,  has further polarised the Party in the South-West with the loyalty of members in the Party divided.

Also, Governor Makinde is having issues with his Deputy Governor, Rauf Olaniyan, which is affecting Governance in the State.

The Oyo State Governor has, however, been dilly-dallying with the ADC in recent times, prompting speculations that the Governor may soon quit the PDP that brought him into power.

Over the weekend, this magazine confirmed from a PDP Chieftain in the State claims, making  the rounds that the Governor wants to go to ADC ahead of 2023 due to some disagreements.

The PDP Chieftain who pleaded  anonymity said that Governor Makinde will join ADC immediately after the forthcoming Local Government election in the State.

He added that the governor was not satisfied with the current leadership of the PDP in the State, hence his decision to dump the party for ADC.

Governor Makinde has been engaging ADC Chieftains among whom are Monsurat Sunmonu, a former Speaker in the State, to have a smooth defection to ADC.

It was gathered that Sunmonu is one of  ADC chieftains that have been holding forth for Makinde in ADC.

The PDP Chieftain said; “Yes, you will see, he will soon leave the party. He is going to ADC. I am telling you, he will leave the PDP soon.

“He has been talking to those in ADC. I am telling you that he will soon leave PDP. After the Local Government Election, he will leave PDP”, he claimed.

But a reliable source, close to the Governor dismissed the speculation as nonsence. Laughing heartily, he asked: ” How in the world  would you believe that Governor Makinde will leave a National party like the PDP, and join an unknown ADC?

“Do you think the PDP at the National level will allow their only foothold in the South-west, to slip through its hands over Fayose and an ungrateful Deputy Governor? The PDP would rather sacrifice both men than lose Governor Makinde.

“Fayose wants to be the PDP leader in the South-west when he is no longer a Governor. He is a rabble rouse who talks without thinking. He wants to destabilise the party. We will not allow him. Even in his own State, Ekiti, he had destabilised the party, because he does not want work with Senator Olujimi.

“Forget it, Makinde is going nowhere. That speculation is  a lie planted by the party’s enemies. It will not work.”

2023: Break-up Fears Hit APC as Tinubu’s Loyalists Mull New Party |The Source

0
Bola Tinubu
Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu

By Chidi Levi

Will the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, still remain intact before the next election year, 2023? That is the question members ask behind closed doors.

But not everyone in the party will readily give a yes answer to the question, at least, not some die- hard loyalists of Asiwaju Ahmed  BolaTinubu across the country who are insistent that the party as presently constituted, is heavily skewed against their Principal’s alleged 2023 presidential ambition.

The loyalists, this magazine understands, are currently mulling exiting the APC and forming a new party that will be built around Tinubu, a former Lagos state governor and National Leader of the ruling party.

The idea, according to credible sources, is for Tinubu to take a shot at the Presidency on the platform of the new party.

Adams Oshiomhole
Oshiohmole: Was he axed to spite Tinubu?

Though this magazine cannnt  confirm whether the former Lagos state governor is in league with those canvassing a divorce from the APC, and formation of a new party, he appears not happy with certain happenings in the APC.

Few days after one of his staunchest loyalists and former Osun governor, Chief Bisi Akande, descended heavily on the party over its ongoing membership revaluation exercise, Tinubu himself was to also fault the exercise.

Formidable Forces Are Against Asiwaju in the APC

One of the former Governor’s supporters told this magazine: “I can authoritatively tell you that forces arrayed against Asiwaju in the APC are formidable. They are scared of him. They know he is a formidable politician with countrywide grassroots appeal, they know that in a free contest, the APC presidential ticket will be his for the asking.That’s why they have distorted the party and skewed its structures heavily against him.

“But they will be shocked soon. We are working towards taking the soul of APC from them.We will leave the impotent carcass for them to do whatever they wish”

The Oshiohmole/ Edo Guber Election and Buni Connection

This magazine learnt that the ouster of Adams Oshiohmole as the National Chairman of the APC, his replacement with Yobe state governor,Mai Mala Buni as National Caretaker Committee Chairman, and the party’s defeat in the September 19, 2020 Edo gubernatorial election were seen by Tinubu supporters in the party as clear indicators of orchestrated plots to weaken him politically.

And these, according to them are how:

Oshiohmole: He is Tinubu’s man. Those who plotted his sack knew that with his exit, the Asiwaju would have lost a strong ally and insider in his drive to corner the 2023 APC Presidential ticket.

Edo election: Forces against Tinubu prevailed on the Presidency and the APC, as a party, to allow a free and fair election, knowing that with that, Governor Godwin Obaseki, who had just defected to the People’s Democratic Party, PDP, could easily win.

The calculations were that Obaseki’s win would  amount to a crushing defeat for Oshiohmole and Tinubu while the reverse would mean handing Edo on a platter of gold as a political outpost to the APC national leader.

Mala Buni’s National Caretaker Committee: Alien to the APC constitution, a National Caretaker Committee was primarily constituted to undo most of Oshiohmole policies and introduce new ones targeted at certain blocs within the party. Example, the ongoing revalidation exercise.

It was gathered that shortly after the Edo election, several chieftains of the party sympathetic to Tinubu met, reviewed the situation, and thereafter took the decision to pull out and form a new party if the forces in the APC undermining their principal do not draw back.

A Northern Agenda?

Multiple party sources told this magazine that the APC is definitely ceding its 2023 ticket to the South, and most probably to the South west but not to Tinubu. A dark horse is reportedly in the offing as APC’s Presidential candidate. “He is someone who is unstained by the baggage and corrupt tendencies of those angling for the position”, one of the sources confided.

However, a party chieftain from the South west who pleaded not to be named has accused a Northern cabal within the APC of plotting to field a weak candidate of Southern extraction ” so as to hand the presidency back to another Northerner after Buhari via the PDP which will be fielding a Northern candidate”

“This is pure self succession agenda of the North. For them, party does not matter as long as another Northerner succeeds Buhari”, he further stated.

Cards on the Table

Meanwhile, the Tinubu camp is weighing so many options including:

*Outright formation of a new party or merger of like minded parties to form a new party

*Revival of the defunct Action Congress of Nigeria, ACN ( a Southwest dominated party with Tinubu as its arrowhead and leader which in 2014, along with other fringe parties, collapsed its structures to form the APC)

*Adoption and rebranding of the Alliance for Democracy, AD (which held sway in the South-west at the dawn of democracy in 1999).

Whichever way, whatever happens, the 2023 Presidential race will be interesting.

Why FG Banned Cryptocurrency |The Source

0
Cryptocurrency

By Uche Mbah

Facts are, gradually, emerging on the thinking behind the Central Bank’s  ban on Cryptocurrency trading in Nigeria, a decision that has generated uproar and heated debate since it was found out to be the easiest way the younger generation is making lots of cash under the present economic conditions in the country.

Sources talked to  over the weekend told this magazine it has much to do with capital flight, money laundering, and more.

Indications are that due to the fear over the collapse of the economy, poor economic policies, and excessive borrowing, many foreigners-and foreign firms are poised to repatriate their money out of the country. Besides, many government officials allegedly are moving their money out of the country. This runs into billions of dollars which will further weaken the economy and send inflation into overdrive.

“Most of the ransom allegedly paid by the Government  are being repatriated out to some other African countries who are complicit in the spread of ethnic dominance of the country by certain groups.

The CBN has resisted the level of an unprecedented capital flight being witnessed in Nigeria”, a source told this magazine. With the hardline stance of the CBN, they are resorting to Cryptocurrency conversion to move such monies. This has mostly increased the volatility of Deposit money banking.

Recall that during the #endsars protest, the CBN attempted to freeze the accounts of the sponsors, but they moved fundings to cryptocurrencies. this was difficult or near impossible- to monitor. this is because Cryptocurrencies are operated outside the Central

ng system because it is a people-based virtual currency that is not bank regulated as such.

But the current issue allegedly  comes from attempts to block the diaspora donations to the activities of Sunday Igboho, who has been fighting the cause of the Yoruba race against herdsmen occupying h ancestral lands.

Attempts to block such donations into his accounts and alleged threats to him on this issue resulted in reports that he declared that he does not need diaspora funds to fight the case. but the donations were moved to cryptocurrencies when the Government  crackdown increased.

But a far more global worry is the issue of money laundering of global proportions. Scammers have been having a field day with bitcoin, the most popular and arguably oldest of the cryptocurrencies, to divert stimulus packages from the united states to Nigeria.

This is made possible because the regulation on cryptocurrency is weak currently, and centralized banking is having sleepless nights over it.

The President of the European Union Central Bank , Christine Lagarde, recently lamented the issue of weak regulation of the currency.

“It’s a highly speculative asset that has led to some reprehensible activity, including money laundering and any loopholes need to be closed.

“There has to be regulated. This has to be applied and agreed upon at a global level because if there is an escape that escape will be used”, she was quoted to have said recently.

The cryptos are commodity-backed, and the commodity of most choice is gold. It is said that over $300 million is being remitted to Nigeria on weekly basis through a bitcoin wallet, making Nigeria the second biggest user of cryptocurrency in the world.

Recall that the Central Bank had instructed deposit money banks and others to stop bitcoin transactions. In a circular to banks, the CBN said:

“Further to earlier regulatory directives on the subject, the Bank hereby wishes to remind regulated institutions that dealing in cryptocurrencies or facilitating payments for cryptocurrency exchanges is prohibited.

“Accordingly, all DMBs, NBFIs and OFIs are directed to identify persons and/or entities transacting in or operating cryptocurrency exchanges within their systems and ensure that such accounts are closed immediately.

“Please note that breaches of this directive will attract severe regulatory sanctions. This letter is with immediate effect,”

Unfortunately, the directive may have little impact on the transactions using bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. It is only when a transaction is labeled as a crypto transaction that it will be tracked. This is because the transactions are encrypted end to end in a complex movement of virtual cash and commodity.

CBN: Hash Reactions Trail Apex Bank’s Ban on Cryptocurrency

0

By Fola James

The Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN has disclosed that no going back on the ban on commercial banks and other financial institutions from trading in cryptocurrency, in line with its argument that the digital currency promotes terrorism and fraud. Last week the Godwin Emefiele-led apex bank issued a statement warning Deposit Money Banks, DMBs and others to expect sanctions if they violate the directive.

The CBN said in a circular that “Further to earlier regulatory directives on the subject, the Bank hereby wishes to remind regulated institutions that dealing in cryptocurrencies or facilitating payments for cryptocurrency exchanges is prohibited.

“Accordingly, all DMBs, NBFIs and OFIs are directed to identify persons and/or entities transacting in or operating cryptocurrency exchanges within their systems and ensure that such accounts are closed immediately.

“Please note that breaches of this directive will attract severe regulatory sanctions. This letter is with immediate effect.”

The directive has, however, attracted divergent views from Nigerians such as a former Vice President Atiku Abubakar who urged the CBN to take a second look at the ban, after reports filtered in that the apex bank has started beaming searchlight on account owners, trading in digital currency with the aim of closing such accounts.

Atikun said “The number one challenge facing Nigeria is youth unemployment. In fact, it is not a challenge, it is an emergency. It affects our economy, and is exacerbating insecurity in the nation. What Nigeria needs now, perhaps more than ever, are jobs and an opening up of our economy, especially after today’s report by the National Bureau of Statistics indicated that foreign capital inflow into Nigeria is at a four year low, having plummeted from $23.9 billion in 2019, to just $9.68 billion in 2020. Already, the nation suffered severe economic losses from the border closure, and the effects of the #COVID19 pandemic.

Godwin Emefiele CBN Governor
Emefiele: Bans Cryptocurrency to Protect National Security

This is definitely the wrong time to introduce policies that will restrict the inflow of capital into Nigeria, and I urge that the policy to prohibit the dealing and transaction of cryptocurrencies be revisited.It is possible to regulate the sub sector and prevent any abuse that may be inimical to national security. That may be a better option, than an outright shutdown. There is already immense economic pressure on our youths. It must be the job of the government, therefore, to reduce that pressure, rather than adding to it. We must create jobs in Nigeria. We must expand the economy. We must remove every impediment towards investments. We owe the Nigerian people that much

A newspaper, at the weekend claimed that the clamp down on suspicious accounts came on the heels of intelligence report from the Federal Bureau of Intelligence, FBI that cryptocurrency accounts are being used by terrorists and fraudsters to funnel illegal funds to promote their activities.

In the report by THISDAY, the federal government and CBN were said to have received intelligence report from FBI on the activities of fraudsters using cryptocurrencies to bring into the country hundreds of millions of US Dollars illegally obtained from the USA and other western economies. The CBN insist that the restriction regime is to protect Nigerians and the financial system.

Kingsley Moghalu former CBN Deputy Governor
Moghalu: Describes Ban As a Knee-Jack Approach

Nigerians are not taking the CBN action lightly, particularly traders who insist that the ban was a knee jack approach on the part of the regulator. For instance, a former CBN Deputy Governor and Presidential candidate, Kingsley Moghalu, said the apex bank has destroyed the livelihood of many Nigerians. According to him, digital currency trading is what many Nigerians are using to eke a living, and that such people have now been thrown under the bus as a result of the reckless regulation. He said the CBN should introduce Central Bank Digital Currency, CBDC as has been done by other countries such as China and others.

He further explained that Nigeria is among the top 10 countries with digital currency usage, a point he said should make the apex bank to retrace it tracks over the ban. He said the argument by CBN, that it took the action to protect National security is untenable, adding that all medium of exchange have their attending risks.

He described the ban as a “declaration of war by third world countries” when developed economies are trying to find a way around it. “Many central banks are not comfortable with the cryptocurrency, but they are trying to find a way around it so that it will not bring down the financial system. We are in depressed economy many Nigerians are making a living from trading in digital currency. CBN should take a risk management approach” rather than an outright ban. He noted that the CBN should not embark on a popularity contest with other countries that have taken similar action.

Meanwhile, analysts insist that terrorism and fraud cannot be used as the basis for destroying the potentials of digital currency trading. What the CBN should do, according to digital currency experts, is to ensure that cryptocurrency does not replace the naira as the nation’s legal tender.

On his part, Senator Iheyen, President Blockchain Technology Association of Nigeria, SiBAN said the CBN took a right decision on the issue.

Others insist that the clamp down constitute a minus for the country at a time that a former Finance Minister, Ngozi-Okonjo Iweala is set to become the Director General of the World Trade Organisation, following her endorsement at the week end by the United State President Joe Biden.

Appointments: What Pushes Mr President? |The Source

0
Comfort Obi
Comfort Obi

By Comfort Obi

On Thursday, 4th, February, 2021, President Muhammadu Buhari stunned most Nigerians. He nominated his immediate past Service Chiefs as non- career Ambassadors. Mr President had removed them a few days earlier, appointed their replacements, on the grounds that he needed fresh hands with fresh ideas, to fight the worsening insecurity in the country.

Ordinarily, what the President did was his simple constitutional duty. But these appointments are neither simple nor ordinary. Most Nigerians are agreed that as far as controversial appointments go, the President has broken his own record in the instant case.. Uproar and Outrage, at once, reign.

You already know the beneficiaries from this stunning appointments. But for the purpose of this write-up,  a short brief is  necessary.

So, stand up for the President’s ambassadorial handshake, General Abayomi Olonisakin, the immediate past Chief of Defence Staff, Lt. General Tukur Buratai, the immediate past Chief of Army Staff; Vice Admiral Ibok -Ete Ibas, the immediate past Chief of Naval Staff, Air Vice Marshal  Sadique Abubakar, the immediate past Chief of the Air Staff and, Air Vice Marshal Mohammed Usman, of the Military Intelligence. All, now, retired Military officers.

The guys are lucky. In the history of Nigeria, they take the cake as the longest serving Service Chiefs. Appointed by President Buhari soon after he was sworn into office in 2015, he allowed them to serve, and serve and serve.

Years after they ought to have retired from service, Mr President kept extending their tenures in office.  He turned a deaf ear to all entreaties to let them go. Almost every stakeholder asked  the President to remove them from office.

The reason was glaring.

The state of insecurity was worsening everyday. But the President thought otherwise.  He did not only ignore entreaties from “ordinary people”, and some retired military officers, but  he also ignored the National Assembly.

On about three occasions, the National Assembly – both the Senate and the House of Representatives, had asked Mr President to remove them from office. He played deaf.They passed a resolution to that effect. Mr President did not as much as acknowledged the resolution.

Presidential aides defended what one angry Cleric, I forget his name now, described as “the President’s abnormal stubbornness.” But Aides said nobody could stampede the President into changing his Service Chiefs. They said they were serving at the pleasure of the President. But of course.

Public officers in Nigeria serve at their own pleasure, or that of their bosses.  They never serve at the pleasure of the public, or  the good of the country.

Mr President’s Aides reminded us that nobody changes a winning team. Nigerians disagreed on the use of the word, “winning.” Their assessment was depressingly different. They said insecurity is worse than ever. It spread from the North to the South,  no longer restricted to a particular zone. Nigeria became one of the world’s most dangerous countries to live in, or visit.

The activities of Boko Haram increased. The number of Internally Displaced People, IDP, tripled. Boko Haram got younger brothers to help in the blood letting. Bandits. Rogue Fulani herdsmen. Kidnappers. Cultists. All baying for our blood. All slaughtering innocent Nigerians.

Our gallant military officers and men, and other security personnel, were being killed and, atimes, over-ran and overwhelmed. Nigeria  became one huge slaughter field under the watch of the Ex- Service Chiefs.

Buhari and Service Chiefs
President Buhari and Ex-Service Chiefs

But the Presidency said we had a winning team.

We are better off than when the Buhari Government arrived, they sang everyday. They cite two examples.

“There was a time bombs were going off in Abuja”. No longer, they told us. “When we came in, Boko Haram was in control of 18 Local Government Areas in Borno State.”  True?

Of all the claims of successes, that of Borno is the most confounding.

Here is why.

Elections were held in the State during the 2015 General elections. From  records, the All Progressives Congress, APC, won in all the LGAs. Meaning that elections were held in all the LGAs.

Questions then: If Boko Haram was in charge of  18 LGAs, how did APC win in all the LGAs in Borno State? Who conducted the Elections? How did the then Prof Attahiru Jega’s INEC, do it? Did Boko Haram conduct the elections on INEC’s behalf, and submitted the results, thereafter? Or did some people sit down somewhere, as we see now and then,  to fabricate the results  and submitted to INEC?

Truth, however, till date, is: Borno state has never been free of Boko Haram since the Buhari Government. The claim, everytime, by the immediate past Army Chief, Buratai, and some elements in Government that Boko Haram has been cleared, or to use their word, decimated, in the state, and all that area,  is false. The claim that no LGA in the state is occupied by the insurgents is false. A number of LGAs in the State are  under the sect.

Recently, the Speaker of the Borno Stare House of Assembly, Abdulkarim Lawan, put a lie to that claim. He said his LGA is fully occupied by Boko Haram. He has not been able to go home in the past two years, he revealed.

He is not the only one.

Many Borno indigenes have not been able to go home in years. And it is not only Bornu. Yobe, Adamawa, Sokoto, Zamfara, and even President Buhari’s Katsina State,  have not fared any  better either. There are, also, Benue and Taraba states. And, this insecurity is spreading from State to State. From region to region.

From North to South. Nowhere is safe.

Insecurity, especially terrorism,  is not a thing to celebrate. Or to throw  blames around. It is just that before the Buhari administration,  the then opposition party, APC, made it  look as if it will be as easy as ABC to wipe terrorism off Nigeria once they came in. It was made to look like “Once we come in, it is over.” But like they say, talk is cheap. They have been in power since 2015, and the story is worse.

It is because the security situation was worse than ever  that most Nigerians kept asking the President to change his Service Chiefs. It got so bad it became the subject of sermons in Mosques and Churches. But the President ignored the calls, and resisted every pressure to do that.

Obviously, the President was seeing something most Nigerians were not seeing. He was seeing something, not even the Leadership of the National Assembly and other members were not seeing. Which is not impossible. As the President and Commander-in-Chief, he is in a position to get privileged security briefings not available to others.

Which must be why he ignored the negative perception the public had of his immediate past Service Chiefs.

Where the people saw incompetence, Buhari saw competence. Where they saw inefficiency, he saw efficiency. Where they saw tiredness, he saw the strength of an angry lion. Where Nigerians scored their performances an “F”, the Commander-in-Chief scored them an “A.”

No doubt, the immediate past Service Chiefs did their best. But their best was not enough, given the scary insecurity situation in the country which has,  gradually, but steadily, produced warlords in the country. It has forced different ethnic regions in the country to form their own security outfits. They go by all kinds of names, and have different designations.

In the South-west, there is the red-attired Amotekun. And of course, there is the newest rave, quickly dubbed freedom fighter, Sunday Igboho.

In most parts of the North, there is the  CJTF. In Kano state, there is the  Government-backed Shariah Police, Hisbah, an outfit, which has garnered such powers, that a couple of days ago, its members  arrested a police officer, for daring to drink alcohol. See!

Aside from this illegal arrest, both the Federal and Kano state Governments turn a blind eye to the destruction of people’s businesses worth hundreds of millions of Naira, because “they are selling alcohol.” Yet, the Kano State Government, shamelessly, partakes in the sharing of VAT derivable from alcoholic products.

In the South-South, individual states have set up different Security outfits. Delta state launched its own recently, and so has Cross River State.

And, in the South-east, after waiting, on end, for the Governors to do something about the worsening insecurity in the region, particularly, the atrocities by rogue herdsmen, Nnamdi Kanu’s IPOB  took the initiative to set-up its own Security outfit, the black-uniformed Eastern Security Network, ESN.

For good measure, Kanu warned the Governors that IPOB would not allow any other security outfit set up by them to operate anywhere in the region.

This is total madness. There is total confusion in the land. If anybody was in doubt of how explosive these outfits and individuals have become, what went on in Oyo  and Ogun States where Sunday Igboho held sway for days,  or where Amotekun had killed a couple of people, including a  policeman, or the mayhem in Orlu, Imo State, where the ESN squared-off with Soldiers and Policemen, should give an inkling to what the future holds.

In deed, the President, himself had, at least, on one occasion told the ex- Military Chiefs that their best was not enough.

The question, not a few people are asking, is:

On which basis  then did  the President nominate the Ex-Service Chiefs as Nigeria’s Ambassadors?

That is what the uproar is about.

For the records, the President has the right to appoint anybody he pleases to any office of his choice. His aides have so emphasised. But what is that saying about the voice of the people being the voice of God?

In the opinion of the people, these appointments do not gell. They see them as inappropriate. They see them as hasty. They see them as insensitive. They see them, according to the Senate Minority Leader, Enyinnaya Abaribe, as  rewards for poor performance.

The most provocative, many point out, are the nominations of Olonisakin and Buratai, the Chiefs of Defence Staff and Army, respectively.

The Army, under them, has been accused of many human rights abuses. Many petitions have been written to the effect, especially, since the sad, and yet to be resolved, incident at the Lekki Toll Gate during the #EndSARS protest by angry youths. The role, allegedly played by soldiers under Buratai is still being looked into by a Panel set up by the Government.

There are documented petitions against Buratai lodged with the International  Criminal Court, ICC. Fatou Bensouda, ICC Prosecutor, has since acknowledged it, and said “Buratai is under investigation.”

So, the question: what was the hurry in nominating them Ambassadors? They have just retired, Having worked so hard, they have not even had the time to rest and bond again with their wives and children,  land they are being saddled with another responsibility, as if Nigeria is barren of qualified men and women.

It is the haste associated with their nominations that Nigerians find uncomfortable and obscene.  It is why Dr Junaid Mohammed has described the nominations as an insult on Nigerians.

Others rightly say it is an affront on the National Assembly, especially, the Senate, which had noted they were incapable of securing Nigeria and, on more than one occasion asked for their sack.

It is why not a few people think something is fishy, and meant to cover-up something. It is why a few Nigerians think that appointing them Ambassadors is meant to confer on them diplomatic immunity from any arrest and prosecution by the ICC, if any merit is found in the petitions before the body.

However, all hope is not lost.

Having sent their names to the Senate for “urgent confirmation”, all eyes are now focused on the Senate.

Will the Senate confirm men they had dismissed as tired and incapable of securing the country as Ambassadors.? Will they confirm, as Ambassadors, men they had asked the President to sack as Service Chiefs? If they were not able here, how able will they be outside the country? Will the Senate go back to its vomit. Will the Senators shun partisanship, and focus on Nigeria’s pride and integrity?  Or, will Mr President have a rethink, and withdraw their names from the Senate as has been suggested in some quarters?

The chorus out there is: That will be the day. As you know, the Nigerian big man and woman hardly accept mistakes. They carry on without a second thought!


*Obi is the Editor-in-Chief/CEO of The Source (Magazine), https://thesourceng.com.  Email: [email protected], [email protected]

Yoruba Group Faults Gumi On Separatists, Terrorists, Says Cleric Is Dishonest |The Source

0

By Akinwale Kasali

Islamic spiritual leader, Sheik Abubakar Gumi, has been faulted on his claims that “Freedom Fighters” in the South -east and South-west are the same as terrorists and rogue herdsmen operating across the country.

In a statement on Sunday, February 5th, 2021, signed by Col (rtd) Abimbola Sowumi and Ahmed Akorede,  the Pan Yoruba coalition, Apapo O’odua Koya, (AOKOYA) said the Sheik deliberately distorted facts in other to suit his primordial ethnic interests.

The group said it now understands why Gumi did not, at any time, codemn the wanton killings, assassinations, rape and murder unleashed by his people on indigenous communities.

After meeting with some over 600 armed bandits, kidnappers and terrorists in Zamfara, Gumi said the Oodua, Igbo groups agitating for self determination are the same as armed herdsmen, terrorists and kidnappers.

AOKOYA said “It’s a shame that Sheik Gumi is comparing self determination with terrorists and violent hersmen. This is a dirty game he has adopted. He should know that terrorists kill in their bid to violently subvert the land and faith of others while self determination groups are only responding to threats of extinction brought by the terrorist groups.

AOKOYA said the demands of IPOB and Yoruba self determination groups have been submitted  and acknowledged by the United Nations, ECOWAS and Africa Union wondering what international bodies support violent herdsmen and terrorists.

“To link terrorism with self determination is mischief and a veiled  plot to distract local and international community from the plot by the terrorists and herdsmen  to rule Nigeria through violence and terror.”

AOKOYA said the fact that Gumi enjoys the goodwill and measure of respect from murderers and spineless criminals who rape and kill indiscriminately showed the whole world deep concern about Gumi’s taste for  extremism. His statement suggests that Gumi as, also, spiritual head of terrorism in Nigeria is faslely parading himself as a Clergyman.

The group said Sheik Gumi is unhappy that  Igbo and Yoruba are  resisting the violence  imposed on them by the terrorists.

“The difference is clear. Terrorists and herdsmen adopt violence, murder, rape and savage killings which includes dismemberment of bodies of their victims. Herdsmen and terrorists adopt suicide bombing. They want to introduce a theocratic state in a plural country like Nigeria. They are also imposing their brand of faith on indigenous peoples. They profess to conquer and subdue lands that do not support them. They operate outside their own traditional homeland. They are heavily armed. It is the height of dishonesty for anyone to draw any parallel lesson between heavily armed criminal herdsmen and those agitating for self determination.

“Gumi is very dishonest  He is hiding under illusion to defend his own people who are globally acknowledged  perpetrators of violence. He went to meet armed terrorists and bandists.He dined and wined with them. This means he was their respected leader. He and the Federal Government know them. They are not interested in dislodging them. Infact they are protecting them.”

AOKOYA said “Sheik Gumi is comparing Sunday Adeyemo, Nnamdi Kanu with Shekarau, whose Boko Haram has murdered more than 10,000 people. It shows how unGodly Sheik Gumi is. He is a fraud, a supporter of criminals, an ethnic chauvinist who receives inglorious trophy from blood sucking rogues and murderers”

AOKOYA said “the simple logic is this, why can’t Shekarau visit the United Nations as Kanu does? Why can’t Shekarau visit UK and Europe the way Sunday Adeyemo does? Shekarau has no fixed address and his trademark is indiscriminate violence. Igboho and Kanu have never been associated with any violence except to mobilise their people against armed invaders who are thirsty for human blood and whose mission is to conquer Nigerians by force.

“IPOB and O’odua groups are only armed with ideas while Gumi’s adopted children are armed with, sub machine guns and rocket propelled grenades.”

The group said the failure of the Nigerian state to protect indigenous peoples is pushing many indigenous peoples to arm themselves so that they will not perish.

It said Gumi is desperate to cover up the atrocities of the terrorists who have painted the Nigerian landscape red with human blood.

“With the statement credited to Sheik Gumi, he is an accomplice to murder and genocide. He wants to change the narrative of the nature and form of the conflict in Nigeria. The Yoruba  and the world are not deceived by his dirty antics”, the statement ended.

Supreme Court Justices Forge Their Age- Salami

0

By Tosin Olatokunbo

Justice Ayodele Salami, a former President of the Court of Appeal has kicked against the extension of the retirement age of Supreme Court justices from 70 to 75 years, adding that most justices forge their age to remain in office.

The National Assembly is planning to amend the Constitution to allow Court of Appeal and Supreme court justices to stay in office beyond 70 years. The lawmakers are proposing 75 years in the new amendment to the 1999 Constitution.

But Justice Salami who was retired from office in controversial circumstances by former President Goodluck Jonathan, told the Nation that many judges are already too old to work, as they constantly go for treatment abroad to keep in shape.   .

The retired justice said the present crop of justices in the higher court is too old and that they should leave to pave the way for young and vibrant set of Nigerians to be employed into the Bench.

Salami said “It’s understood that it’s being contemplated to raise the tenure of the Supreme Court justices and possibly those of the Court of Appeal to 75 years within the next couple of weeks. To be precise, before the end of March.The profession is ominously silent over it.

“I could remember that the same issue was brought up by the Senate during my screening for the President of the Court of Appeal which was persuaded by my reasoning.

“I contended that very few of us had birth certificates. Invariably we rely on declaration of age, which is generally inflated because they are inferred from incidences or occurrences the happening of which we were not sure of.”

He said many justices are unproductive, that increasing their age of retirement would be bad for the country.

He said: “So to be increasing age which is predicated on unsure parameters could be dangerous merely because their counterparts elsewhere retire at about that age without taking into account the faulty starting point.

“The living conditions in those countries as well as their health facilities are in no manner comparable with ours. Many of them are not healthy. They regularly travel abroad for treatment, and some of them forget easily in addition to memory challenges.

“In the circumstances, some of the justices would only be there as passengers to fulfill statutory conditions without ability to make meaningful contribution. This is a condition that could easily be exploited by dishonest members of the court.

“It’s my humble opinion that the present retirement age is adequate for any sincere hardworking member of the court. It’s not only consuming but also tasking emotionally, physically and mentally. There is a pool of qualified, experienced and healthier professionals from which vacancies created by their respective retirements can be filled.”

“We should have in mind their output at old age. The interest of the nation and not preference of the justices should be paramount on the minds of the senators. The employer and not the labourer determines the duration of the contract. It’s the people who make a constitution for themselves and not an institution thereof.”

Justice Salami was the Chairman of the Judicial Commission, set up by President Muhammadu Buhari to investigate Ibrahim Magu, sacked chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC,

Horror In Imo: How A Lawyer Was Murdered In His Owerri Office |The Source

0
N.H.Nwankwo

By Gideon Njoku

Outrage has greeted the horrendous murder of an Owerri-based lawyer in his office located in the state capital. Shock  has gripped his heartbroken colleagues. And so has fear gripped the state capital.

The lawyer, N.H.Nwankwo had left for work on Saturday. His office is located on No 43 School road, Owerri.

He went to work with his driver. When he did not return on Friday, frantic calls were made to him by his family. But there were no connections. The family then called the Chairman of the NBA, Imo State, J.I. Ogamba to relate their experience.

Ogamba acted urgently, and sent Chinedu Agu, the Secretary of the NBA , Owerri, to go and check out what was wrong.

Before then, Nwankwo’s office neighbour, Ishmael Nkwocha, had already, in response, to calls, rushed to the office.  The door was locked, but he noticed a ” splashes of blood” by the door, and called in the Police.

Along with other lawyers, the Police forced open the office, and there was his gruesomely, butchered body.

He was machetted while still working on his computer.

A machete was found in his rest room. And so was a bucket of water with which the Police suspect the assailants used to wash their hands. Blood, some already congealed, spluttered everywhere, including the roof and fan.

It is not yet known when he was murdered. Perhaps, on Saturday, since he did not go back home on Saturday.

The surprise: His driver, with whom he went to work had disappeared. And so were his car and phones. He is at large.

Following is the full text of the first statement on Nwankwo’s murder as issued by the NBA, Owerri

FROM THE SECRETARIAT OF NBA OWERRI.

N.H NWANKWO, ESQ. MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD!

At about 8.15am today on my way to Church for 8.30am Mass, I received a call from the Chairman of the Bar, J.I Ogamba, Esq. detailing me to liaise with the former Secretary of the Bar, Ishmael Nkwocha Esq., to take Police to N.H Nwankwo & Co. at 43 School Road Owerri, to ascertain the safety of N.H Nwankwo, Esq. who left home for work yesterday Saturday the 6th day of February, 2021 and was yet to return from work.

However, earlier to the call, Ishmael Nkwocha, who shares same office space with him had, in response to frantic calls from his family members over the uncertainty of his whereabouts, gone to his office to meet same locked.

On opening the Entrance door, he met Nwankwo’s main office locked and with traces of blood on the door to his (Nwankwo’s) office.

Not very sure of the situation, he went to the Homicide Section of the State CID, going with him Forensic Experts from the Police Headquarters to the office to have it properly opened by themselves in order not to contaminate evidential materials.

When the forensic experts arrived at 9:56hrs with their gadgets, they opened the door only for us to find his bulky frame lying lifeless inside his office in a pool of his congealed blood.

On a closer inspection, Nwankwo appeared to have been savagely matchetted by his Assailant, as a very  gaping cut was seen on his neck, a monstrous cut of not less than of about 30cm with only about less than 50percent of the flesh in his neck region holding the head.

Blood splashes were seen on the roof, fans, Printer, Computers, table, files, seats, books, bookshelves inside his office suggestive of a ferocious matchetting of his neck.

Nwankwo was suspected to have been busy working as his Printer, Computer, Standing Fan were on while a writing pad containing jottings unrelated to this incident and a Pen were found on his Desk.

A bucket of water was seen in his office, with which the Assailant must have washed his hands and Matchet used in this act.

A search of the office revealed a Matchet abandoned inside the Toilet of his office with which the Assialant was suspected to have used to cut his neck.

When his body which lay half prostrate was turned matchet cuts were seen on his Wrist also and the footprints captured by forensic experts suggested the act was done by two persons as the two footprints were unidentical.

As at the time of this Provisional report, Forensic Experts are still gathering evidential materials for their use accompanied by myself, L.C Ugorji, Uche Osuji,  Ishmael Nkwocha, J.I Ogamba, D.O Nosike and a host of other Lawyers.

Meanwhile, his Driver, who reportedly was the only person with him in the office on Saturday, is at the time of this report at large, with Nwankwo’s phones, and Car no where to be found.

Arrangement has just been concluded to take the lifeless body to the Morgue.

This is one death too many; one murder too savage!

Chinedu Agu

Secretary,

NBA Owerri

(The Heartland Bar)

07.02.2021

11:43hrs.

Ambassadors: Why Senate Should Disapprove Of Ex-Service Chiefs – Timi Frank |The Source

0

By Akinwale Kasali

Reactions have continued to trail the decision of President Muhammadu Buhari’s to appoint Ex-Service Chiefs as non-carrer Ambassadors.

Former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Timi Frank, on Sunday, gave reasons why the Senate should not confirm ex-Service Chiefs recently nominated as ambassadors.

The nominees, by President Buhari, are: Gen Abayomi Olonisakin (rtd), Lt Gen Tukur Y. Buratai (rtd), Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd), Air Marshal Sadique Abubakar (rtd), and Air Vice Marshal Mohammed S. Usman (rtd).

Frank said the Senate would be going against its many resolutions when it passed votes of no confidence on the former Military Chiefs based on incompetence.

According to him, their confirmation would amount to both chambers of the National Assembly returning to their vomit.

He listed occasions when the Senate and the House of Representatives had expressly urged President Muhammadu Buhari to sack the ex-military  Service Chiefs over lack of capacity, incompetence and failure to stem the tide of insecurity in the country to include:

*The attack by army personnel on residents of Naka in Gwer-West Local Government Area of Benue State and the beheading of 67 rice farmers by Boko Haram insurgents in Zabarmari community in Jere Local Government Area of Borno State.

*Senate’s resolution on a motion sponsored by the Senate Majority Leader, Senator Yahaya Abudullahi, titled: “Nigerian Security Challenges: Urgent Need To Restructure, Review And Reorganize The Current Security Architecture.”

*The minority caucus in the House of Representatives again called for the sack of the service chiefs in its reaction to the attack on the convoy of the Governor of Borno State, Baba Gana Zulum, by suspected Boko Haram terrorists, on July 31, 2020.

He noted that prominent groups in the country including the Pan-Yoruba Socio-Political Group, Afenifere, Coalition of Northern Elders for Peace and Development, apex Igbo socio-cultural organisation, Ohanaeze Ndi’Igbo and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) had, at various times, called or supported calls for the sack of the Service Chiefs over their failure to secure the country – humongous annual defence budgets notwithstanding.

To crown it all, he recalled that President Buhari had passed a vote of no confidence on the ex-military  Chiefs when he told them that their “best was not good enough.”

The Bayelsa-born political activist wondered whose interest the Senate would be serving by confirming the ‘failed Generals’ as Ambassadors in the face of widespread doubt over their competence, capacity and capabilities when they were in service.

He said that Nigerians are watching to see how the Senate, especially its opposition lawmakers, will betray the confidence reposed in them by allowing this potentially egregious confirmation of the ex-military Chiefs to sail through.

“We have it on good authority that they have earmarked funds to the tune of $100,000.00  per Senator to have their way but the Senators need to show patriotism by rejecting the money and the nominees in the national interest and as true representatives of the people,” he declared

Investigations by this magazine shows that the bribe allegation, by Frank is not supported by any proof, and is one of such wild bribe allegations that remain unproven and false.